MedTrace Logo

Patient Satisfaction, Peri-implant Parameters and Crestal Bone Evaluation of PEEK (Polyetheretherketone) Abutments Versus Zirconium Abutments Restored With PEEK Based Superstructure

NCT03714074 · Status: UNKNOWN · Phase: NA · Type: INTERVENTIONAL · Enrollment: 30

Last updated 2018-10-22

No results posted yet for this study

Summary

The aim of the study is to evaluate the patients' satisfaction, peri-implant parameters (bleeding on probing, probing depth and plaque index) and crestal bone resorption of implants restored with PEEK abutments restored with PEEK superstructure compared to implants restored with zirconia abutments with PEEK superstructure.the NULL HYPOTHESIS;There is no difference between the two groups

Conditions

  • Patients Satisfaction

Interventions

DEVICE

PEEK implant abutment

Implants will be restored with abutments made from polyetheretherketone (PEEK) abutments and a PEEK superstructure

DEVICE

Zirconia abutment

Imolants will be restored with zirconia abutments and a PEEK superstructure

Sponsors & Collaborators

  • Cairo University

    lead OTHER

Principal Investigators

  • Amina Zaki, Professor · Cairo University

Study Design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
TRIPLE
Model
PARALLEL

Eligibility

Min Age
18 Years
Sex
ALL
Healthy Volunteers
Yes

Timeline & Regulatory

Start
2019-01-31
Primary Completion
2021-01-31
Completion
2021-07-31

More Related Trials

Read the full study record

This page highlights key information. For complete eligibility criteria, study locations, investigator contacts, and the full protocol, visit the original record on ClinicalTrials.gov.

View NCT03714074 on ClinicalTrials.gov