MedTrace Logo

Patient Satisfaction and Crestal Bone Loss of Polymer Infiltrated Ceramic Network Versus Lithium Disilicate Implant Hybrid Abutment Crowns in Esthetic Zone

NCT03333889 · Status: UNKNOWN · Phase: NA · Type: INTERVENTIONAL · Enrollment: 36

Last updated 2017-11-07

No results posted yet for this study

Summary

P: Population: Patients requiring single unit implant restoration in esthetic zone I: Intervention: Polymer-infiltrated-ceramic-network abutment crown (VITA Enamic-VITA Zahnfabrik) C: Comparison: Lithium disilicate ceramic abutment crown (IPS e. max-Ivoclar Vivadent) O: Outcome: patient satisfaction , crestal bone loss and periodontal parameters T: Time: 12 months S :Randomized controlled trial research question:For patients receiving implants in esthetic zone, Does the use of polymer-infiltrated-ceramic-network hybrid abutment crown offer better patient satisfaction , less bone loss and better peri-implant clinical parameters when compared to lithium disilicate hybrid abutment crowns?

Conditions

  • Hybrid Crowns on Single Implants in Esthetic Zone

Interventions

OTHER

Vita Enamic hybrid crown

hybrid ceramic material in the form of mesoblocks where the ceramic block is attached to a ti base .The whole assembly is screw retained superstructure.

OTHER

emax hybrid crown

high srength glass ceramic that can be milled in sections up to 1mm .

Sponsors & Collaborators

  • Cairo University

    lead OTHER

Study Design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
DOUBLE
Model
PARALLEL

Eligibility

Min Age
18 Years
Max Age
60 Years
Sex
ALL
Healthy Volunteers
Yes

Timeline & Regulatory

Start
2018-01-31
Primary Completion
2019-01-31
Completion
2019-04-30

Countries

  • Egypt

Study Locations

More Related Trials

Read the full study record

This page highlights key information. For complete eligibility criteria, study locations, investigator contacts, and the full protocol, visit the original record on ClinicalTrials.gov.

View NCT03333889 on ClinicalTrials.gov