Two Years Follow up of Polyetheretherketone (PEEK) Sub-periosteal Implant Retaining Maxillary Fixed Prosthesis
NCT05193110 · Status: COMPLETED · Phase: NA · Type: INTERVENTIONAL · Enrollment: 5
Last updated 2022-01-14
Summary
This clinical trial demonstrates prosthetic management of patients complained from lack of satisfaction and function of maxillary conventional complete denture as a result of severe maxillary ridge resorption seeking for fixed restoration. They were attended to the Department of Prosthodontics, Faculty of Dentistry, Mansoura University (Mansoura, Egypt). They demonstrated sever bone loss especially in the posterior region which complicate conventional implant placement for full arch prosthesis. Eight PEEK sub-periosteal implants were surgically placed. Probing depth was measured after three \& six months from sub-periosteal implant placement. Tumor necrosis factor-alpha (TNF-α) \& Interleukin-8(IL-8) Peri-abutment cervicular fluid were measured one month, three months , six months \& one year from sub-periosteal implant placement. Clinical \& Radiographic examination (CBCT) was done two years after sub-periosteal implant placement.
Conditions
- Mastication Disorder
Interventions
- OTHER
-
Polyetheretherketone (PEEK) Sub-periosteal Implant Retaining Maxillary Fixed Prosthesis
Sub-periosteal Implant Retaining Maxillary Fixed Prosthesis fabricated by digital \& milling technology
Sponsors & Collaborators
-
Mansoura University
lead OTHER
Principal Investigators
-
Salah A. Hegazy, PhD · [email protected]
Study Design
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Purpose
- OTHER
- Masking
- SINGLE
- Model
- PARALLEL
Eligibility
- Min Age
- 50 Years
- Max Age
- 65 Years
- Sex
- ALL
- Healthy Volunteers
- Yes
Timeline & Regulatory
- Start
- 2019-12-23
- Primary Completion
- 2021-12-02
- Completion
- 2021-12-28
Countries
- Egypt
Study Locations
More Related Trials
-
Patient Satisfaction, Peri-implant Parameters and Crestal Bone Evaluation of PEEK (Polyetheretherketone) Abutments Versus Zirconium Abutments Restored With PEEK Based Superstructure
NCT03714074 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Effect of PEEK and Co-Cr Framework Reinforcement on Marginal Bone Loss Around Implants Supporting a Fixed All-on-four Prosthesis in Completely Edentulous Mandibles. A Randomized Controlled Clinial Trial
NCT06591611 ·Status: ACTIVE_NOT_RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Evaluation of Peri-Implant Tissues of Different Implant Assisted Overdentures
NCT06647199 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Retention, Chewing Efficiency and Masticatory Performance of Partial Dentures Opposing Implant Retained Prosthesis.
NCT05999760 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Retention of CAD Metallic and Poly Ether Ether Ketone (PEEK) Frameworks
NCT05670899 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
(PEEK) Housing Verses Metallic Housing of Ball and Socket Attachment on Retention of Mandibular Overdenture
NCT02950662 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Patient Satisfaction , Marginal Adaptation And Biocompatibility of Milled Biohpp Polyetheretherketone (PEEK) Single Anterior Crowns Veneered With Two Different Techniques.
NCT04914325 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: PHASE4
-
Patient Satisfaction and Oral Healthy Related Quality of Life of Polyetherketoneketone and Metal Framework.
NCT05904756 ·Status: RECRUITING
-
Clinical Performance of All-on-4 PEEK and Conventional Prostheses
NCT06388395 ·Status: ENROLLING_BY_INVITATION ·Phase: NA
-
Oral Health Related Quality of Life in Cad Metallic and Poly Ether Ether Ketone (Peek) Partial Denture Frameworks in Mandibular Kennedy Class I Cases
NCT06789627 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Prosthetic Complications in Fixed All-On-Four Prosthesis Reinforced with Poly Ether Ether Ketone (PEEK) Versus Cobalt Chromium (Co-Cr) Framework
NCT06631573 ·Status: ACTIVE_NOT_RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Comparison Between Injection Molded Polyetheretherketone (PEEK) Framework and Cobalt Chromium Framework Removable Partial Dentures Regarding Periodontal Health of Abutment Teeth
NCT03777345 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Polyetheretherketone vs Cobalt-chromium Telescopic Removable Partial Denture in Kennedy Class I Patients Regarding Oral Health Related Quality of Life
NCT03771248 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Comparison Between Injection Molded PEEK Framework and Cobalt Chromium Framework Removable Partial Dentures Regarding Biting Force
NCT03777423 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Effect of Zirconia Implant Supported PEKK Crowns Versus Lithium Disilicate Crowns on Esthetics
NCT03521024 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Clinical and Radiographic Evaluation of The Effect of Acetal Resin Versus PEEK on Supporting Structure of Abutment Teeth
NCT06882161 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: PHASE3
-
Compressive Single-piece Implants for Immediate Rehabilitation of Edentulous Maxillectomy Patients
NCT06572891 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Modified Periosteal Inhibition with Simultaneous Implant Placement in Aesthetic Zone
NCT06519773 ·Status: RECRUITING ·Phase: PHASE1/PHASE2
-
Evaluation of Using 3D Printed PEEK Facial Implants in Repairing Maxillofacial Deformities
NCT05348434 ·Status: COMPLETED
-
Biomechanical Effects of Digitally Constructed Subperiosteal Implants
NCT06362057 ·Status: RECRUITING
-
Denture Retention of Intra-orally Scanned Versus Extra-orally Scanned Digitally Printed Maxillary Denture in Completely Edentulous Patients
NCT07290322 ·Status: ACTIVE_NOT_RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Implant Stability Using Densah Bur Versus Expander
NCT03613415 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Functional Relining Versus Digital Altered Cast Using Digitally Fabricated Distal Extension Frameworks
NCT06082609 ·Status: ENROLLING_BY_INVITATION ·Phase: NA
-
Digital Versus Conventional Altered Cast Techniques For Constructing Mandibular Distal Extension Removable Partial Dentures Using Digitally Fabricated Frameworks: Alveolar Bone Height Changes
NCT05899712 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Patient Satisfaction and Dimensional Accuracy of Bre Flex and Peek for Removable Partial Dentures
NCT03025555 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA