Comparison Between Injection Molded PEEK Framework and Cobalt Chromium Framework Removable Partial Dentures Regarding Biting Force
NCT03777423 · Status: UNKNOWN · Phase: NA · Type: INTERVENTIONAL · Enrollment: 30
Last updated 2018-12-17
Summary
This study is aiming to evaluate the biting force of polyetheretherketone (PEEK) framework partial dentures compared to that of cobalt-chromium ones in mandibular Kennedy class I edentulous cases hoping that polyetheretherketone (PEEK) framework removable partial dentures can improve the patient masticatory efficiency .
Conditions
- Mandibular Prosthesis User
Interventions
- DEVICE
-
PEEK framework partial dentures
Polymer-based framework recently introduced made of polyetheretherketone polymer frame combined with acrylic resin denture teeth and a conventional acrylic resin denture base.
- DEVICE
-
Cobalt- chromium framework partial dentures
It's a bio-compatible metal used in thin sections so less bulky, provide high strength and stiffness ,conduct heat and cold for a more natural experience, enable designs that minimize the covering of the gingival margins, allow for a stable denture base, and resistance to corrosion.Drawbacks of metal frameworks can include hypersensitivity, aesthetics because of metal metal display, oral galvanism, adverse tissue reactions, osteolysis of abutment teeth, and biofilm production
Sponsors & Collaborators
-
Cairo University
lead OTHER
Study Design
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Masking
- SINGLE
- Model
- PARALLEL
Eligibility
- Sex
- ALL
- Healthy Volunteers
- No
Timeline & Regulatory
- Start
- 2019-01-01
- Primary Completion
- 2019-04-01
- Completion
- 2019-07-01
Countries
- Egypt
Study Locations
More Related Trials
-
Abutment Analysis of Metallic Denture Frameworks in Mandibular Kenedy Class III Cases
NCT07215208 ·Status: NOT_YET_RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Prosthetic Complications in Fixed All-On-Four Prosthesis Reinforced with Poly Ether Ether Ketone (PEEK) Versus Cobalt Chromium (Co-Cr) Framework
NCT06631573 ·Status: ACTIVE_NOT_RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Porcelain-fused-to-metal Versus Zirconia Implant- Supported in Mandibular Kennedy Class II
NCT06150768 ·Status: RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Evaluation of PEEK Versus Titanium Bar Attachments With Implant Assisted Mandibular Complete Overdenture Fabricated by CAD/CAM Technology
NCT07262307 ·Status: ACTIVE_NOT_RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Retention of CAD Metallic and Poly Ether Ether Ketone (PEEK) Frameworks
NCT05670899 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Mandibular Overdentures vs All-on-4 With PEEK
NCT07137533 ·Status: RECRUITING
-
Clinical Performance of All-on-4 PEEK and Conventional Prostheses
NCT06388395 ·Status: ENROLLING_BY_INVITATION ·Phase: NA
-
PEEK Versus Metallic Framework for Extra Coronal Attachment
NCT04990453 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Prosthetic Maintenance of Two Implant-Retained Overdentures Reinforced With PEKK Versus Co-Cr Frameworks
NCT06219811 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Clinical and Radiographic Evaluation of The Effect of Acetal Resin Versus PEEK on Supporting Structure of Abutment Teeth
NCT06882161 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: PHASE3
-
Retention, Chewing Efficiency and Masticatory Performance of Partial Dentures Opposing Implant Retained Prosthesis.
NCT05999760 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Biting Force and Chewing Efficiency of Complete Dentures.
NCT04793503 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Measuring Biting Force of Poly-amide Complete Dentures
NCT03253510 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Manually Versus Digitally Fabricated Removable Partial Dentures
NCT01191073 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
PEEK Vs Titanium for All-on-4 Prosthesis
NCT06700733 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Compare CAD/CAM Metallic RPD to Conventional Metallic RPD in Terms of Oral Health Related Quality of Life
NCT06567262 ·Status: NOT_YET_RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Patient Satisfaction, Peri-implant Parameters and Crestal Bone Evaluation of PEEK (Polyetheretherketone) Abutments Versus Zirconium Abutments Restored With PEEK Based Superstructure
NCT03714074 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Retention of Computer Aided Design and Computer Aided Manufacturing Titanium Versus Co/Cr Single Dentures.
NCT03675594 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
CAD-CAM PEEK Framework for All-on-4 Implants
NCT06017596 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Microbial Adhesion to Metallic Versus Non Metallic Surfaces of Bounded Removable Partial Denture
NCT03008317 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
3D-Printed Implant Overdentures: Comparing Impression Techniques
NCT07208812 ·Status: RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Effect of Zirconia Implant Supported PEKK Crowns Versus Lithium Disilicate Crowns on Esthetics
NCT03521024 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Comparison Between Single Implant Retained Partial Over-denture and Conventional Partial Denture
NCT03324789 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Cost-effectiveness of the Single-implant Mandibular Overdenture Versus Mandibular Conventional Denture
NCT03463174 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Periodontal Health and Patient Satisfaction of CAD/CAM Fiber-Reinforced vs. PFM Attachments in Distal Extension RPDs
NCT06871020 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA