MedTrace Logo

Patient Satisfaction and Peri-Implant Tissue Success of Hybrid Ceramic Versus E-Max Superstructures

NCT02941575 · Status: UNKNOWN · Phase: NA · Type: INTERVENTIONAL · Enrollment: 22

Last updated 2016-10-21

No results posted yet for this study

Summary

In patients receiving implants in the esthetic zone, would the use of new Nano hybrid ceramic crown material (Crystal Ultra) improve esthetic patient satisfaction and peri-implant tissue success when compared with Lithium Disilicate crown (E-max)?

Conditions

  • Prosthesis Survival

Interventions

OTHER

Crystal Ultra

Crystal Ultra: is a resin nano-ceramic material, that combines both advantages of ceramics and composites.

OTHER

All ceramic

IPS Emax: is an all ceramic crown that has proven superior aesthetics and strength properties.

Sponsors & Collaborators

  • Cairo University

    lead OTHER

Principal Investigators

  • Jylian El Guindy, Professor · Cairo University

Study Design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
DOUBLE
Model
PARALLEL

Eligibility

Min Age
18 Years
Max Age
70 Years
Sex
ALL
Healthy Volunteers
Yes

Timeline & Regulatory

Start
2016-12-31
Primary Completion
2018-03-31
Completion
2018-05-31

More Related Trials

Read the full study record

This page highlights key information. For complete eligibility criteria, study locations, investigator contacts, and the full protocol, visit the original record on ClinicalTrials.gov.

View NCT02941575 on ClinicalTrials.gov