Comparison Between Injection Molded Polyetheretherketone (PEEK) Framework and Cobalt Chromium Framework Removable Partial Dentures Regarding Periodontal Health of Abutment Teeth
NCT03777345 · Status: UNKNOWN · Phase: NA · Type: INTERVENTIONAL · Enrollment: 30
Last updated 2018-12-17
Summary
This study is aiming to evaluate the periodontal status of the abutment teeth in Polyetheretherketone ( PEEK ) framework partial dentures compared with cobalt-chromium ones in mandibular kennedy class I edentulous cases aiming to preserve the optimum periodontal health of the abutment teeth .
Conditions
- Mandibular Prosthesis User
Interventions
- DEVICE
-
cobalt-chromium framework partial dentures
It's a biocompatible metal alloy used in thin sections and are less bulky, provide high strength and stiffness ,conduct heat and cold for a more natural experience, enable designs that minimize the covering of the gingival margins, allow for a stable denture base, and is resistant to corrosion. Disadvantages include hypersensitivity, esthetic issues with metal display, oral galvanism, adverse tissue reactions, osteolysis of abutment teeth, and biofilm production .
- DEVICE
-
PEEK framework partial dentures
It's a promising polymer-based framework material has recently been introduced which is made of polyetheretherketone polymer frame combined with acrylic resin denture teeth and a conventional acrylic resin denture base.
Sponsors & Collaborators
-
Cairo University
lead OTHER
Study Design
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Masking
- SINGLE
- Model
- PARALLEL
Eligibility
- Sex
- ALL
- Healthy Volunteers
- No
Timeline & Regulatory
- Start
- 2019-01-01
- Primary Completion
- 2019-04-01
- Completion
- 2019-07-01
Countries
- Egypt
Study Locations
More Related Trials
-
Oral Health Related Quality of Life in Cad Metallic and Poly Ether Ether Ketone (Peek) Partial Denture Frameworks in Mandibular Kennedy Class I Cases
NCT06789627 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Patient Satisfaction, Peri-implant Parameters and Crestal Bone Evaluation of PEEK (Polyetheretherketone) Abutments Versus Zirconium Abutments Restored With PEEK Based Superstructure
NCT03714074 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Abutment Analysis of Metallic Denture Frameworks in Mandibular Kenedy Class III Cases
NCT07215208 ·Status: NOT_YET_RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Mandibular Overdentures vs All-on-4 With PEEK
NCT07137533 ·Status: RECRUITING
-
Clinical Performance of All-on-4 PEEK and Conventional Prostheses
NCT06388395 ·Status: ENROLLING_BY_INVITATION ·Phase: NA
-
Clinical and Radiographic Evaluation of The Effect of Acetal Resin Versus PEEK on Supporting Structure of Abutment Teeth
NCT06882161 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: PHASE3
-
CAD-CAM PEEK Framework for All-on-4 Implants
NCT06017596 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Retention of CAD Metallic and Poly Ether Ether Ketone (PEEK) Frameworks
NCT05670899 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Prosthetic Maintenance of Two Implant-Retained Overdentures Reinforced With PEKK Versus Co-Cr Frameworks
NCT06219811 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Comparative Study of Biting Force of Injection Molded PEEK and Bre.Flex for Removable Partial Dentures.
NCT03038737 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Patient Satisfaction and Oral Healthy Related Quality of Life of Polyetherketoneketone and Metal Framework.
NCT05904756 ·Status: RECRUITING
-
Effect of Zirconia Implant Supported PEKK Crowns Versus Lithium Disilicate Crowns on Esthetics
NCT03521024 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
PEEK Vs Titanium for All-on-4 Prosthesis
NCT06700733 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Periodontal Health and Patient Satisfaction of CAD/CAM Fiber-Reinforced vs. PFM Attachments in Distal Extension RPDs
NCT06871020 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Porcelain-fused-to-metal Versus Zirconia Implant- Supported in Mandibular Kennedy Class II
NCT06150768 ·Status: RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Effect of PEEK and Co-Cr Framework Reinforcement on Marginal Bone Loss Around Implants Supporting a Fixed All-on-four Prosthesis in Completely Edentulous Mandibles. A Randomized Controlled Clinial Trial
NCT06591611 ·Status: ACTIVE_NOT_RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Evaluation of PEEK Versus Titanium Bar Attachments With Implant Assisted Mandibular Complete Overdenture Fabricated by CAD/CAM Technology
NCT07262307 ·Status: ACTIVE_NOT_RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Retention, Chewing Efficiency and Masticatory Performance of Partial Dentures Opposing Implant Retained Prosthesis.
NCT05999760 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
PEEK Versus PFM Implant Supported Superstructure
NCT03578913 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Comparing Cobalt-Chromium Versus PEEK Secondary Telescopic Crowns on Implant Retained Mandibular Overdenture.
NCT06637930 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Evaluation of Peri-Implant Tissues of Different Implant Assisted Overdentures
NCT06647199 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Digital Evaluation of Accuracy for Removable Partial Denture Frameworks
NCT06412159 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Manually Versus Digitally Fabricated Removable Partial Dentures
NCT01191073 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Digital Versus Conventional Altered Cast Techniques For Constructing Mandibular Distal Extension Removable Partial Dentures Using Digitally Fabricated Frameworks: Alveolar Bone Height Changes
NCT05899712 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Comparison of Patient Satisfaction Between Conventional and Digital Removable Partial Dentures
NCT07228988 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA