PEEK Versus PFM Implant Supported Superstructure
NCT03578913 · Status: UNKNOWN · Phase: NA · Type: INTERVENTIONAL · Enrollment: 24
Last updated 2018-07-09
Summary
The purpose of this study is to evaluate the influence of two superstructure materials Porcelain Fused to Metal (PFM) and PEEK on peri- implant soft and hard tissue reaction clinically.
Conditions
- PEEK Implant Supported Restoration
Interventions
- OTHER
-
PEEK crown
The main concern of dental implants is their lack of elasticity, therefore with the use of PFM, all ceramic or zirconia crowns; the load is directly transferred to bone. That is why up till now researchers are in quest of different materials to enhance soft and hard tissue reaction around implant supported restorations. Recently the use of PEEK as a final restoration on dental implants has wide acceptance, due to its excellent biocompatibility and exceptional physical and chemical properties regarding toughness, hardness and elasticity. In term of load cushioning capacity of the prosthetic elements, PEEK has a comparable modulus of elasticity (4GPa) to that of bone (4.2GPa). Thus, the bone could allow bone stimulation favoring its remodeling without overloading.
- OTHER
-
PFM Crown
Although metal free restorations are gained popularity recently, PFM restorations, whether they are tooth-supported or implant-supported are still considered as the gold standard due to their excellent biocompatibility, consistent esthetics, superior strength, and marginal adaptation.2 PFM restorations are also considered durable and long-lasting
Sponsors & Collaborators
-
Cairo University
lead OTHER
Study Design
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Masking
- DOUBLE
- Model
- PARALLEL
Eligibility
- Min Age
- 18 Years
- Max Age
- 70 Years
- Sex
- ALL
- Healthy Volunteers
- Yes
Timeline & Regulatory
- Start
- 2018-11-01
- Primary Completion
- 2019-12-01
- Completion
- 2020-02-01
More Related Trials
-
Comparison Between Injection Molded Polyetheretherketone (PEEK) Framework and Cobalt Chromium Framework Removable Partial Dentures Regarding Periodontal Health of Abutment Teeth
NCT03777345 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Polyetheretherketone vs Cobalt-chromium Telescopic Removable Partial Denture in Kennedy Class I Patients Regarding Oral Health Related Quality of Life
NCT03771248 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Lithium Disilicate Glass-ceramic Versus Hybrid Ceramic Superstructure Materials on Implant Stability
NCT02931903 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Comparative Study of Biting Force of Injection Molded PEEK and Bre.Flex for Removable Partial Dentures.
NCT03038737 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Evaluation of Peri-Implant Tissues of Different Implant Assisted Overdentures
NCT06647199 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Retention of Metal Reinforced Polyamide Denture Base and Heat Cured Acrylic Resin Denture Base in Complete Mandibular Denture
NCT03385746 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Patient Satisfaction and Peri-Implant Tissue Success of Hybrid Ceramic Versus E-Max Superstructures
NCT02941575 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Patient Satisfaction and Dimensional Accuracy of Bre Flex and Peek for Removable Partial Dentures
NCT03025555 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Retention of Peek and Bre.Flex Materials Maxillary Bilateral Bounded Removable Partial Dentures
NCT03025568 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Conventional Impressions Versus Digital Impression Techniques for Implant Supported Screw Retained Prosthesis
NCT05912725 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Two-unit Cantilever Implant Prostheses Made of Monolithic Zirconia or PFM
NCT04713800 ·Status: RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Retention of CAD Metallic and Poly Ether Ether Ketone (PEEK) Frameworks
NCT05670899 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Soft and Hard Tissues Evaluation Around Immediately Placed New Implant Design
NCT04905758 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Prosthetic Complications in Fixed All-On-Four Prosthesis Reinforced with Poly Ether Ether Ketone (PEEK) Versus Cobalt Chromium (Co-Cr) Framework
NCT06631573 ·Status: ACTIVE_NOT_RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Influence of Superstructure Material on Crestal Bone Resorption and Esthetic Outcome of Dental Implants
NCT02937220 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Evaluation of Chewing Efficiency of Conventional Complete Denture in Comparison to Reinforced Poly Amide Denture
NCT03391063 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Abutment Macro Design and Peri-implant Tissues
NCT02546713 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Measuring Quality of Life of Poly-amide Complete Dentures
NCT03234803 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Immediate Implant Placement With Different Materials of Customized Healing Abutment for Guiding Peri-implant Soft Tissue Healing in Posterior Teeth
NCT06645444 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Retention, Chewing Efficiency and Masticatory Performance of Partial Dentures Opposing Implant Retained Prosthesis.
NCT05999760 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Comparing the Secondary Stability of Dental Implants: Immediate Gradual Loading Versus Early Loading Protocol in Posterior Maxilla
NCT02309125 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Patient Satisfaction , Marginal Adaptation And Biocompatibility of Milled Biohpp Polyetheretherketone (PEEK) Single Anterior Crowns Veneered With Two Different Techniques.
NCT04914325 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: PHASE4
-
Patient Satisfaction and Oral Healthy Related Quality of Life of Polyetherketoneketone and Metal Framework.
NCT05904756 ·Status: RECRUITING
-
PEEK Versus Metallic Framework for Extra Coronal Attachment
NCT04990453 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Immediate Implant With Different Filling Materials
NCT05878392 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA