PEEK Vs Titanium for All-on-4 Prosthesis

NCT06700733 · Status: COMPLETED · Phase: NA · Type: INTERVENTIONAL · Enrollment: 18

Last updated 2025-01-07

No results posted yet for this study

Summary

This crossover clinical study will examine the impact of the framework material of implant-supported prostheses on patient satisfaction and Oral Health-Related Quality of Life (OHRQoL) with mandibular All-on-4 implant distribution. The trial will investigate subject satisfaction, OHRQoL as the primary outcome, and chewing efficiency and maximum bite force as secondary outcomes for different framework materials used in implant-supported screw-retained restorations. The first null hypothesis states no significant difference in patient satisfaction and OHRQoL between the tested prostheses. Additionally, the second null hypothesis states no significant difference in chewing efficiency and maximum bite force between the tested prostheses.

Conditions

  • Satisfaction, Patient
  • Bite Force

Interventions

DEVICE

PEEK prosthesis

For the PP, The PEEK framework will be constructed, the fit of the PEEK framework will be verified intraorally, and the final screw-retained prosthesis will be constructed of PMMA teeth and a visiolign pink composite estimating the gingival tissue.

DEVICE

Titanium prosthesis

For the TP, the framework will be milled from Ti blocks according to the virtual design of the final prosthesis framework. PMMA teeth then will be cemented, and the final prosthesis will be screwed.

Sponsors & Collaborators

  • Mansoura University

    lead OTHER

Principal Investigators

  • Khloud Ezzat, PhD · Lecturer

Study Design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
DOUBLE
Model
CROSSOVER

Eligibility

Min Age
40 Years
Max Age
70 Years
Sex
MALE
Healthy Volunteers
Yes

Timeline & Regulatory

Start
2022-02-23
Primary Completion
2023-03-01
Completion
2023-03-12

Countries

  • Egypt

Study Locations

More Related Trials

Read the full study record

This page highlights key information. For complete eligibility criteria, study locations, investigator contacts, and the full protocol, visit the original record on ClinicalTrials.gov.

View NCT06700733 on ClinicalTrials.gov