PEEK Vs Titanium for All-on-4 Prosthesis
NCT06700733 · Status: COMPLETED · Phase: NA · Type: INTERVENTIONAL · Enrollment: 18
Last updated 2025-01-07
Summary
This crossover clinical study will examine the impact of the framework material of implant-supported prostheses on patient satisfaction and Oral Health-Related Quality of Life (OHRQoL) with mandibular All-on-4 implant distribution. The trial will investigate subject satisfaction, OHRQoL as the primary outcome, and chewing efficiency and maximum bite force as secondary outcomes for different framework materials used in implant-supported screw-retained restorations. The first null hypothesis states no significant difference in patient satisfaction and OHRQoL between the tested prostheses. Additionally, the second null hypothesis states no significant difference in chewing efficiency and maximum bite force between the tested prostheses.
Conditions
- Satisfaction, Patient
- Bite Force
Interventions
- DEVICE
-
PEEK prosthesis
For the PP, The PEEK framework will be constructed, the fit of the PEEK framework will be verified intraorally, and the final screw-retained prosthesis will be constructed of PMMA teeth and a visiolign pink composite estimating the gingival tissue.
- DEVICE
-
Titanium prosthesis
For the TP, the framework will be milled from Ti blocks according to the virtual design of the final prosthesis framework. PMMA teeth then will be cemented, and the final prosthesis will be screwed.
Sponsors & Collaborators
-
Mansoura University
lead OTHER
Principal Investigators
-
Khloud Ezzat, PhD · Lecturer
Study Design
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Masking
- DOUBLE
- Model
- CROSSOVER
Eligibility
- Min Age
- 40 Years
- Max Age
- 70 Years
- Sex
- MALE
- Healthy Volunteers
- Yes
Timeline & Regulatory
- Start
- 2022-02-23
- Primary Completion
- 2023-03-01
- Completion
- 2023-03-12
Countries
- Egypt
Study Locations
More Related Trials
-
Clinical Performance of All-on-4 PEEK and Conventional Prostheses
NCT06388395 ·Status: ENROLLING_BY_INVITATION ·Phase: NA
-
Effect of PEEK and Co-Cr Framework Reinforcement on Marginal Bone Loss Around Implants Supporting a Fixed All-on-four Prosthesis in Completely Edentulous Mandibles. A Randomized Controlled Clinial Trial
NCT06591611 ·Status: ACTIVE_NOT_RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Two Versus Four Implant-supported Fixed Full-arch Prosthesis
NCT05290766 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Assessment of Osseointegration Properties of Nano-Hydroxy Apatite Coated Titanium Implant
NCT05936775 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Titanium Versus Soft Metal CAD/CAM Frameworks for All-on-4 Implant Supported Prosthesis
NCT06114966 ·Status: RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Comparison Between Injection Molded PEEK Framework and Cobalt Chromium Framework Removable Partial Dentures Regarding Biting Force
NCT03777423 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Patient Satisfaction , Prosthetic Complications and Clinical Outcomes of PEEK Composite Versus Titanium Zirconium
NCT06111391 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Four Implant Retained Mandibular Overdenture VERSUS Fixed-detachable Prosthesis.
NCT07144787 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Radiographic Evaluation of All-on-4 Implant Prosthesis With Different Materials and Bar Construction Techniques
NCT06071689 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Comparison Between Injection Molded Polyetheretherketone (PEEK) Framework and Cobalt Chromium Framework Removable Partial Dentures Regarding Periodontal Health of Abutment Teeth
NCT03777345 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Comparing Marginal Bone Loss for Immediately Loaded Implants in Maxillary Full Arch Interim Prosthesis Using Welded Titanium Bar Versus Polyetheretherketone Bar
NCT06127017 ·Status: NOT_YET_RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Patient Satisfaction and Oral Health-Related Quality of Life of Quadrilateral Versus Bilateral Linear Bar Designs for Four Implant Implant-Assisted Complete Mandibular Overdenture Regarding Peri-Implant Crestal Bone Loss
NCT06673173 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Accuracy and Scannability of Implant-Supported Framework Materials
NCT06423482 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Comparative Evaluation Between One-piece and Two-piece Implants Supporting Mandibular Screw-retained All-On-Four Full-arch Prosthesis on Peri-implant Bone Changes.
NCT06790524 ·Status: NOT_YET_RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Evaluation of Peri-Implant Tissues of Different Implant Assisted Overdentures
NCT06647199 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Trueness of Full Arch Scans and Generated Digital Implant Models
NCT06281002 ·Status: NOT_YET_RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Hybrid Polyetheretherketone (PEEK)-Acrylic Resin Prostheses and the All-on-4 Concept for Full Arch Rehabilitation
NCT04446078 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Patient Satisfaction, Peri-implant Parameters and Crestal Bone Evaluation of PEEK (Polyetheretherketone) Abutments Versus Zirconium Abutments Restored With PEEK Based Superstructure
NCT03714074 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Complete Digital Workflow
NCT07091786 ·Status: ENROLLING_BY_INVITATION ·Phase: PHASE2/PHASE3
-
Evaluation of PEEK Versus Titanium Bar Attachments With Implant Assisted Mandibular Complete Overdenture Fabricated by CAD/CAM Technology
NCT07262307 ·Status: ACTIVE_NOT_RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
3D-Printed Implant Overdentures: Comparing Impression Techniques
NCT07208812 ·Status: RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
PEEK Prostheses in the All-on-4 Concept Using Zygomatic Implants for Full-arch Rehabilitation.
NCT05589545 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
PEEK Bar Versus Titanium Bar Fabricated by CAD-CAM in Mandibular Hybrid Prostheses: A Comparative Study
NCT06201169 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Patient Satisfaction and Crestal Bone Changes Around One-piece Zirconia(Zr) and Titanium(Ti) in Implant-Retained Mandibular Overdenture
NCT06643975 ·Status: RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
The Effect of Clip Material on the Retention of Implant Supported Mandibular Overdenture
NCT06866067 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA