MedTrace Logo

Effect of Zirconia Implant Supported PEKK Crowns Versus Lithium Disilicate Crowns on Esthetics

NCT03521024 · Status: UNKNOWN · Phase: NA · Type: INTERVENTIONAL · Enrollment: 10

Last updated 2018-05-11

No results posted yet for this study

Summary

aim of study is to evaluate esthetic and biomechanical outcome of maxillary anterior single-tooth zirconia implant supported PEKK crowns compared to lithium disilicate crowns on PEKK abutments .

Conditions

  • Tooth Loss

Interventions

OTHER

poly ether ketone ketone

Polyetherketoneketone (PEKK) forms a group of high-performance thermoplastic polymers. PEKK shows excellent biocompatibility and exhibits outstanding properties such as high wear resistance and high compressive (246 MPa), flexural (5.0GPa), and tensile strengths (115 MPa). The material is lightweight, allows shock absorption, and can be veneered with various commercially available dental materials

OTHER

lithium disilicate

well documented in the literatures as successful restoration modality.

Sponsors & Collaborators

  • Cairo University

    lead OTHER

Principal Investigators

  • Lamiaa Abdelsalam, MSc · Cairo University

Study Design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
DOUBLE
Model
PARALLEL

Eligibility

Min Age
18 Years
Max Age
45 Years
Sex
ALL
Healthy Volunteers
Yes

Timeline & Regulatory

Start
2018-09-15
Primary Completion
2019-06-15
Completion
2019-09-15

More Related Trials

Read the full study record

This page highlights key information. For complete eligibility criteria, study locations, investigator contacts, and the full protocol, visit the original record on ClinicalTrials.gov.

View NCT03521024 on ClinicalTrials.gov