PEEK Versus Metallic Framework for Extra Coronal Attachment
NCT04990453 · Status: COMPLETED · Phase: NA · Type: INTERVENTIONAL · Enrollment: 28
Last updated 2021-09-05
Summary
Purpose: The present study was aimed to evaluate the bone height changes around abutments with two different framework materials for extracoronal attachment mandibular bilateral distally extension removable partial denture (RPD) and compare patient satisfaction associated with its use.
Materials and methods:
Ten partially edentulous patients (long span kennedy class I) were selected, for all patients splinting of remaining abutment were done by porcelain fused to metal bridges, after cementation the RPD frameworks were digitally designed by CAD software and printed into 3-D resin pattern after intra-oral try in of these patterns, the patients were divided into two equalized groups, the patients in first group received extracoronal attachment (RPD)with from milled PEEK (Juvora) framework. While patients in second group received extracoronal attachment (RPD) with conventional metal framework by lost wax technique. Digital radiography was used for bone height assessment of distal abutment at time of prosthesis insertion, 6 and 12 months later. Patient satisfaction was measured using VAS scale.
Conditions
- Removable Partial Denture
Interventions
- OTHER
-
RPD frameworks fabricated from PEEK material
extracoronal precision attachment RPD frameworks fabricated from PEEK material using milling machine (CAD/CAM technology)
Sponsors & Collaborators
-
Kafrelsheikh University
lead OTHER
Study Design
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Masking
- SINGLE
- Model
- PARALLEL
Eligibility
- Min Age
- 55 Years
- Max Age
- 60 Years
- Sex
- ALL
- Healthy Volunteers
- Yes
Timeline & Regulatory
- Start
- 2020-02-02
- Primary Completion
- 2021-04-15
- Completion
- 2021-05-15
Countries
- Egypt
More Related Trials
-
Abutment Analysis of Metallic Denture Frameworks in Mandibular Kenedy Class III Cases
NCT07215208 ·Status: NOT_YET_RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Evaluation of the Abutment Type Following Oral Implants in Terms of the Surrounding Bone Height
NCT05350293 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Polyetheretherketone vs Cobalt-chromium Telescopic Removable Partial Denture in Kennedy Class I Patients Regarding Oral Health Related Quality of Life
NCT03771248 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Periodontal Health and Patient Satisfaction of CAD/CAM Fiber-Reinforced vs. PFM Attachments in Distal Extension RPDs
NCT06871020 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Patient Satisfaction, Peri-implant Parameters and Crestal Bone Evaluation of PEEK (Polyetheretherketone) Abutments Versus Zirconium Abutments Restored With PEEK Based Superstructure
NCT03714074 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Mandibular Overdentures vs All-on-4 With PEEK
NCT07137533 ·Status: RECRUITING
-
Retention of CAD Metallic and Poly Ether Ether Ketone (PEEK) Frameworks
NCT05670899 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Digital Evaluation of Accuracy for Removable Partial Denture Frameworks
NCT06412159 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Clinical Performance of All-on-4 PEEK and Conventional Prostheses
NCT06388395 ·Status: ENROLLING_BY_INVITATION ·Phase: NA
-
Effect of PEEK and Co-Cr Framework Reinforcement on Marginal Bone Loss Around Implants Supporting a Fixed All-on-four Prosthesis in Completely Edentulous Mandibles. A Randomized Controlled Clinial Trial
NCT06591611 ·Status: ACTIVE_NOT_RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Patient Satisfaction and Bone Changes for OT Cap and OT Vertical Attachment
NCT03221803 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
One-piece and Two-piece Zirconia Abutments in Single Implant Crowns in Esthetic Region
NCT05583123 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Oral Health Related Quality of Life in Cad Metallic and Poly Ether Ether Ketone (Peek) Partial Denture Frameworks in Mandibular Kennedy Class I Cases
NCT06789627 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Influence of Superstructure Material on Crestal Bone Resorption and Esthetic Outcome of Dental Implants
NCT02937220 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Comparison of Patient Satisfaction Between Conventional and Digital Removable Partial Dentures
NCT07228988 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Compare the Difference in Occlusal Force Distribution and Denture Retention Using 2 Different Denture Base Materials in Implant Retained Overdenture
NCT07250503 ·Status: ACTIVE_NOT_RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Prosthetic Maintenance of Two Implant-Retained Overdentures Reinforced With PEKK Versus Co-Cr Frameworks
NCT06219811 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Comparison Between Single Implant Retained Partial Over-denture and Conventional Partial Denture
NCT03324789 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
PEEK Versus PFM Implant Supported Superstructure
NCT03578913 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Functional Relining Versus Digital Altered Cast Using Digitally Fabricated Distal Extension Frameworks
NCT06082609 ·Status: ENROLLING_BY_INVITATION ·Phase: NA
-
Four-unit Implant Supported Fixed Partial Dentures Fabricated From Different Materials
NCT06422260 ·Status: RECRUITING
-
Patient Satisfaction , Marginal Adaptation And Biocompatibility of Milled Biohpp Polyetheretherketone (PEEK) Single Anterior Crowns Veneered With Two Different Techniques.
NCT04914325 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: PHASE4
-
Evaluation of Patient Satisfaction Using Autogenous Inlay (Sandwich) Eminoplasty Versus Patient Specific Poly Ether-ether Ketone (PEEK) Onlay Implant
NCT03994692 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
PEEK Versus Metallic Attachment-retained Obturators
NCT04778254 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Patient Satisfaction and Oral Healthy Related Quality of Life of Polyetherketoneketone and Metal Framework.
NCT05904756 ·Status: RECRUITING