Comparative Study of Biting Force of Injection Molded PEEK and Bre.Flex for Removable Partial Dentures.
NCT03038737 · Status: UNKNOWN · Phase: NA · Type: INTERVENTIONAL · Enrollment: 20
Last updated 2017-02-01
Summary
The aim of the present study is to evaluate the biting force of upper removable partial denture constructed from two different flexible thermoplastic materials.
Conditions
- Biting
Interventions
- OTHER
-
bre.flex
In the recent time thermoplastic materials become quite popular in clinical practice such as nylon and acetal resins. since the 1950, polyamide resin (nylons) provide improved esthetics and reduction of rotational forces on the abutment teeth due to their low elastic modulus(3). The major disadvantage of a nylon RDP is the inability for a reline procedure and the lack of occlusal rests as well as rigid frameworks, that could lead to occlusal instability and sinking, especially in Kennedy class I and II cases. On the other hand, acetal resins present adequate mechanical strength to form a frame-work more rigid than nylon with retentive clasps, connectors, and supportive elements; however, the acetal resin material lacks natural translucency and vitality.
- OTHER
-
PEEK
PEEK has been successfully used over the last years in the medical field, and orthopedics, specifically. which presents high biocompatibility, good mechanical properties, high temperature resistance, and chemical stability due to a 4 GPa modulus of elasticity, it is as elastic as bone and can reduce stresses transferred to the abutment teeth.Additional advantages of this polymer material are elimination of allergic reactions and metallic taste, high polishing qualities, low plaque affinity, and good wear resistance, it has only recently been used in dentistry.
Sponsors & Collaborators
-
Cairo University
lead OTHER
Study Design
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Purpose
- OTHER
- Masking
- TRIPLE
- Model
- PARALLEL
Eligibility
- Min Age
- 45 Years
- Max Age
- 55 Years
- Sex
- ALL
- Healthy Volunteers
- Yes
Timeline & Regulatory
- Start
- 2017-03-31
- Primary Completion
- 2017-08-31
- Completion
- 2017-10-31
More Related Trials
-
Evaluation of Microbial Growth on Bre-Flex Versus PEEK Denture Base in Bilateral Maxillary Bounded Partial Denture
NCT03491306 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Measuring Quality of Life of Poly-amide Complete Dentures
NCT03234803 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
The Effect of Clip Material on the Retention of Implant Supported Mandibular Overdenture
NCT06866067 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Evaluation of Chewing Efficiency of Conventional Complete Denture in Comparison to Reinforced Poly Amide Denture
NCT03391063 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Biting Force and Chewing Efficiency of Complete Dentures.
NCT04793503 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Comparison Between Injection Molded Polyetheretherketone (PEEK) Framework and Cobalt Chromium Framework Removable Partial Dentures Regarding Periodontal Health of Abutment Teeth
NCT03777345 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Retention of Metal Reinforced Polyamide Denture Base and Heat Cured Acrylic Resin Denture Base in Complete Mandibular Denture
NCT03385746 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Compare the Difference in Occlusal Force Distribution and Denture Retention Using 2 Different Denture Base Materials in Implant Retained Overdenture
NCT07250503 ·Status: ACTIVE_NOT_RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Retention, Chewing Efficiency and Masticatory Performance of Partial Dentures Opposing Implant Retained Prosthesis.
NCT05999760 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Oral Health Related Quality of Life in Cad Metallic and Poly Ether Ether Ketone (Peek) Partial Denture Frameworks in Mandibular Kennedy Class I Cases
NCT06789627 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Comparative Study Between Acrylic and Flexible Dentures
NCT03184883 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Comparison Between Injection Molded PEEK Framework and Cobalt Chromium Framework in Removable Partial Denture Regarding Retention
NCT03777280 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Evaluation of PEEK Versus Titanium Bar Attachments With Implant Assisted Mandibular Complete Overdenture Fabricated by CAD/CAM Technology
NCT07262307 ·Status: ACTIVE_NOT_RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Evaluation of Digital 3D Printed Temporary Removable Partial Denture.
NCT06106243 ·Status: RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Measuring Quality of Life of Versacryl Relined Dentures
NCT03321500 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Evaluation of Candida Albicans Growth on BreFlex Versus PEEK Denture Base in Maxillary Bounded Partial Denture
NCT03462862 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Patient Satisfaction, Peri-implant Parameters and Crestal Bone Evaluation of PEEK (Polyetheretherketone) Abutments Versus Zirconium Abutments Restored With PEEK Based Superstructure
NCT03714074 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
PEEK Versus PFM Implant Supported Superstructure
NCT03578913 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
A Clinical Bite Force Study of Two Marketed Adhesives Against no Adhesive
NCT03037307 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
(PEEK) Housing Verses Metallic Housing of Ball and Socket Attachment on Retention of Mandibular Overdenture
NCT02950662 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
A Study Comparing Two Different Denture Base Materials in Implant Retained Overdentures
NCT07271641 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Microbial Adhesion to Metallic Versus Non Metallic Surfaces of Bounded Removable Partial Denture
NCT03008317 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
3D-Printed Implant Overdentures: Comparing Impression Techniques
NCT07208812 ·Status: RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
To Evaluate the Complete Mandibular Dentures Produced Via 3D Printing in Comparison to Those Constructed From Metal-reinforced Acrylic Resin Regarding Their Retention
NCT07061860 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Patient Specific Plates Versus Conventional Miniplates for Treatment of Mandibular Body Fractures
NCT03608891 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA