Clinical Performance of All-on-4 PEEK and Conventional Prostheses
NCT06388395 · Status: ENROLLING_BY_INVITATION · Phase: NA · Type: INTERVENTIONAL · Enrollment: 30
Last updated 2024-07-25
Summary
The all-on-4 treatment approach for completely edentulous mandible is a proven concept. However, there are still issues regarding the use of metal substructure to support the prostheses such as allergy, metallic taste, and aesthetic. Therefore, other materials such as polyetheretherketone (PEEK) are being tested for its suitability and is showing good potential. However, available evidence is limited regarding its clinical performance. Thus, the aim of this study is to compare clinical performance of all-on-4 treatment concept utilizing PEEK versus conventional metal framework as substructure in fully edentulous mandible. Thirty suitable patients will receive either PEEK or conventional all-on-4 prostheses for fully edentulous mandible. The prostheses will be retained by four implants utilizing the all-on-4 principle. Clinical performance will be assessed during the follow up period of up 3 years concerning screw loosening, material chipping or fracture, wear or staining, prosthesis survival and success, implant survival and success.
Conditions
- Failure, Prosthesis
- Dental Prosthesis, Implant-Supported
- Survival, Prosthesis
- Complete Edentulism
- Complication;Prostheses
Interventions
- PROCEDURE
-
Accuracy of full-arch surgical guides
The accuracy of the surgical guides will be assessed by superimposing the pre and post-treatment CBCT scans.
- PROCEDURE
-
Survival and complications of the prostheses
Two different prostheses will be assessed (conventional and PEEK). All complications will be recorded for a period of 3 years
- PROCEDURE
-
Survival and complications of the implants
The effect of the two different prostheses on implants will be assessed in terms of survival and success rates.
- PROCEDURE
-
Conventional (metal-resin) implant-supported prosthesis
Full-mouth implant-supported conventional prosthesis will be constructed and evaluated for up to 3 years.
- PROCEDURE
-
PEEK implant-supported prosthesis
Full-mouth implant-supported PEEK prosthesis will be constructed and evaluated for up to 3 years.
Sponsors & Collaborators
-
University of Sharjah
lead OTHER
Principal Investigators
-
Ahmed Aziz, PhD · University of Sharjah
Study Design
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Masking
- DOUBLE
- Model
- PARALLEL
Eligibility
- Min Age
- 18 Years
- Sex
- ALL
- Healthy Volunteers
- Yes
Timeline & Regulatory
- Start
- 2024-08-01
- Primary Completion
- 2027-06-30
- Completion
- 2027-08-30
Countries
- United Arab Emirates
Study Locations
More Related Trials
-
Comparison Between Injection Molded PEEK Framework and Cobalt Chromium Framework Removable Partial Dentures Regarding Biting Force
NCT03777423 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Polyetheretherketone vs Cobalt-chromium Telescopic Removable Partial Denture in Kennedy Class I Patients Regarding Oral Health Related Quality of Life
NCT03771248 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Prosthetic Maintenance of Two Implant-Retained Overdentures Reinforced With PEKK Versus Co-Cr Frameworks
NCT06219811 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Effect Of Occlusal Materials Used For All On Four Mandibular Implant Prosthesis With PEEK Framework
NCT06159530 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
PEEK Prostheses in the All-on-4 Concept Using Zygomatic Implants for Full-arch Rehabilitation.
NCT05589545 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Crestal Bone Loss in Mandibular Telescopic Overdentures. Overdenture with Milled Titanium, Milled Poly-ether Ketone Ketones and 3D Printed Chrome Cobalt Secondary Copings.
NCT06639893 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: EARLY_PHASE1
-
The Treatment of Implant-retained Mandibular Overdentures for Edentulous Patients
NCT02846805 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Effect of Zirconia Implant Supported PEKK Crowns Versus Lithium Disilicate Crowns on Esthetics
NCT03521024 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
PEEK Versus Metallic Framework for Extra Coronal Attachment
NCT04990453 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Patient Satisfaction and Oral Healthy Related Quality of Life of Polyetherketoneketone and Metal Framework.
NCT05904756 ·Status: RECRUITING
-
Effect of PEEK and Co-Cr Framework Reinforcement on Marginal Bone Loss Around Implants Supporting a Fixed All-on-four Prosthesis in Completely Edentulous Mandibles. A Randomized Controlled Clinial Trial
NCT06591611 ·Status: ACTIVE_NOT_RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
3D-Printed Implant Overdentures: Comparing Impression Techniques
NCT07208812 ·Status: RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Comparing Cobalt-Chromium Versus PEEK Secondary Telescopic Crowns on Implant Retained Mandibular Overdenture.
NCT06637930 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Retention of CAD Metallic and Poly Ether Ether Ketone (PEEK) Frameworks
NCT05670899 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Evaluation of Patient Satisfaction Using Autogenous Inlay (Sandwich) Eminoplasty Versus Patient Specific Poly Ether-ether Ketone (PEEK) Onlay Implant
NCT03994692 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
"Comparative Study of Supra-Structure Materials in Full-Arch Implant Prosthetics: a Randomized Clinical Trial"
NCT06673355 ·Status: ACTIVE_NOT_RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Evaluation of Peri-Implant Tissues of Different Implant Assisted Overdentures
NCT06647199 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Abutment Analysis of Metallic Denture Frameworks in Mandibular Kenedy Class III Cases
NCT07215208 ·Status: NOT_YET_RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Cost-effectiveness of the Single-implant Mandibular Overdenture Versus Mandibular Conventional Denture
NCT03463174 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Attachment Types for Single-implant Mandibular Overdentures: a Crossover Clinical Trial
NCT03048812 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Patient Satisfaction and Crestal Bone Changes Around One-piece Zirconia(Zr) and Titanium(Ti) in Implant-Retained Mandibular Overdenture
NCT06643975 ·Status: RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Functional Relining Versus Digital Altered Cast Using Digitally Fabricated Distal Extension Frameworks
NCT06082609 ·Status: ENROLLING_BY_INVITATION ·Phase: NA
-
Patient Satisfaction, Peri-implant Parameters and Crestal Bone Evaluation of PEEK (Polyetheretherketone) Abutments Versus Zirconium Abutments Restored With PEEK Based Superstructure
NCT03714074 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Two Years Follow up of Polyetheretherketone (PEEK) Sub-periosteal Implant Retaining Maxillary Fixed Prosthesis
NCT05193110 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Hybrid PEEK-Acrylic Resin Prostheses and the All-on-4 Concept for Full-Arch Rehabilitation - Routine Group
NCT05589493 ·Status: ACTIVE_NOT_RECRUITING ·Phase: NA