3D-Printed Implant Overdentures: Comparing Impression Techniques
NCT07208812 · Status: RECRUITING · Phase: NA · Type: INTERVENTIONAL · Enrollment: 16
Last updated 2026-01-29
Summary
This randomized crossover clinical trial aims to compare three different impression techniques for the construction of 3d-printed mandibular implant overdentures in completely edentulous patients. Sixteen patients will receive two mandibular implants and three overdentures fabricated using:(1) conventional open-tray implant level impression (2) functionally generated reline impression, and (3)mucostatic base with functional borders impression. Each overdenture will be worn for three months with a washout period between interventions.
The primary outcome is masticatory efficiency, assessed using a color -mixing ability test at 3,6, and9 months.
Secondary outcome is patient satisfaction, assessed using a Visual Analog Scale (VAS) at the same intervals. the study hypothesis is that the impression technique influences both chewing efficiency and patient satisfaction
Conditions
- Edentulism
Interventions
- PROCEDURE
-
Conventional open -tray impression
Primary impression with irreversible hydrocolloid, custom tray with open window, and final impression with silicone material around impression copings to fabricate a 3D-printed implant overdenture
- PROCEDURE
-
Functionally generated reline impression
Interim prosthesis relieved and reline impression taken during centric closure with border molding, scanned to construct a 3D-printed implant overdenture
- PROCEDURE
-
Mucostatic base with functional borders impression
Intraoral scan of edentulous arch, 3D-printed baseplates for occlusion rim, functional border molding, and digital workflow to fabricate 3D-printed implant overdenture
Sponsors & Collaborators
-
Mansoura University
lead OTHER
Principal Investigators
-
Shimaa E Aboelenin · Faculty of Dentistry, Mansoura University
Study Design
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Masking
- NONE
- Model
- CROSSOVER
Eligibility
- Min Age
- 45 Years
- Sex
- ALL
- Healthy Volunteers
- Yes
Timeline & Regulatory
- Start
- 2026-01-06
- Primary Completion
- 2027-04-30
- Completion
- 2027-05-31
Countries
- Egypt
Study Locations
More Related Trials
-
3D Printing for the Fabrication of Mandibular Implant Overdentures
NCT06155630 ·Status: NOT_YET_RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Digital Intraoral Scanning With and Without Prefabricated Landmarks Versus Conventional Impression Technique
NCT06592066 ·Status: NOT_YET_RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Comparison of Conventional Versus 3-D Printed Complete Denture Regarding Retention, Accuracy, Elctromyographic Activity and Patient Satisfaction.
NCT05834530 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Accuracy of 3-dimensional Printed Implant Cast Versus Conventional Stone Cast for Edentulous Mandibular Arch
NCT06050187 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Conventional Versus Digital 3D Printed Complete Removable Dentures
NCT05845099 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Comparative Evaluation of Masticatory Efficiency of Implant Supported Overdenture
NCT05877092 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
3D-printed Implant Overdentures
NCT04569929 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Evaluation of Digital 3D Printed Temporary Removable Partial Denture.
NCT06106243 ·Status: RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Accuracy of 3D Printed Maxillary Complete Dentures
NCT03613896 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Comparison of Patient Satisfaction and Chewing Efficiency Between Conventional and 3D Printed Complete Dentures.
NCT06103019 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Denture Retention of Intra-orally Scanned Versus Extra-orally Scanned Digitally Printed Maxillary Denture in Completely Edentulous Patients
NCT07290322 ·Status: ACTIVE_NOT_RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Biting Force and Chewing Efficiency of Complete Dentures.
NCT04793503 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Patient Satisfaction for Digital Versus Conventional Maxillary Obturator
NCT05920811 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Evaluation of CAD/CAM Onlays Fabricated by Subtractive Versus Additive Digital Manufacturing Techniques.
NCT05943782 ·Status: ENROLLING_BY_INVITATION ·Phase: NA
-
Digital Workflow Versus Functional Pick-up Techniques of Two- Implant Retained Mandibular Overdentures
NCT06995547 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
To Evaluate the Complete Mandibular Dentures Produced Via 3D Printing in Comparison to Those Constructed From Metal-reinforced Acrylic Resin Regarding Their Retention
NCT07061860 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Compare the Difference in Occlusal Force Distribution and Denture Retention Using 2 Different Denture Base Materials in Implant Retained Overdenture
NCT07250503 ·Status: ACTIVE_NOT_RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Evaluation of 3D-printed Space Maintainers Versus Conventional Space Maintainer : a Randomized Clinical Trial
NCT06750068 ·Status: NOT_YET_RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Mandibular Implant Overdenture With OT Cap Bar vs Bar Attachment
NCT07067190 ·Status: NOT_YET_RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Prosthetic Maintenance of Two Implant-Retained Overdentures Reinforced With PEKK Versus Co-Cr Frameworks
NCT06219811 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Functional Relining Versus Digital Altered Cast Using Digitally Fabricated Distal Extension Frameworks
NCT06082609 ·Status: ENROLLING_BY_INVITATION ·Phase: NA
-
Abutment Analysis of Metallic Denture Frameworks in Mandibular Kenedy Class III Cases
NCT07215208 ·Status: NOT_YET_RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Evaluation of the Effect of Osseodensefication Technique Versus Conventional Implant Drilling Technique in Implant Supported Mandibular Overdenture
NCT06590753 ·Status: RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Impact of Mandibular Overdenture Base Construction Techniques on Assessment of Occlusion
NCT06080815 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
A Study Comparing Two Different Denture Base Materials in Implant Retained Overdentures
NCT07271641 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA