Effect Of Occlusal Materials Used For All On Four Mandibular Implant Prosthesis With PEEK Framework
NCT06159530 · Status: COMPLETED · Phase: NA · Type: INTERVENTIONAL · Enrollment: 30
Last updated 2023-12-06
Summary
This study was performed to compare between the effects of different occlusal materials used for all on four implant supported mandibular fixed prosthesis with PEEK framework.
Methods of Evaluation
1- Occlusal force analysis using digital occlusal device (occluscan).
The evaluation periods will be done at time of insertion (T0),6 month (T1),12 month(T2) and 18 month(T3) after framework insertion.
Conditions
- Occlusal Trauma
Interventions
- PROCEDURE
-
dental implants
4 dental implants placed in the mandible according to all-on 4 concept
- PROCEDURE
-
peek framework
peek framework screwed to multi-unit abutments of 4-implants
- PROCEDURE
-
visio-lign nano composite
peek framework veneered with nano composite (visio-lign) as an occlusal material
- PROCEDURE
-
zirconia crowns
peek framework covered with zirconia crowns as an occlusal material
Sponsors & Collaborators
-
Mansoura University
lead OTHER
Principal Investigators
-
Mansoura U Faculty of dentistry · Mansoura University Faculty of Dentistry, Prosthodontics department
Study Design
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Masking
- SINGLE
- Model
- PARALLEL
Eligibility
- Min Age
- 45 Years
- Max Age
- 65 Years
- Sex
- MALE
- Healthy Volunteers
- Yes
Timeline & Regulatory
- Start
- 2022-01-20
- Primary Completion
- 2023-09-04
- Completion
- 2023-10-10
Countries
- Egypt
Study Locations
More Related Trials
-
Prosthetic Complications in Fixed All-On-Four Prosthesis Reinforced with Poly Ether Ether Ketone (PEEK) Versus Cobalt Chromium (Co-Cr) Framework
NCT06631573 ·Status: ACTIVE_NOT_RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Clinical Performance of All-on-4 PEEK and Conventional Prostheses
NCT06388395 ·Status: ENROLLING_BY_INVITATION ·Phase: NA
-
Patient Satisfaction and Oral Healthy Related Quality of Life of Polyetherketoneketone and Metal Framework.
NCT05904756 ·Status: RECRUITING
-
Prosthetic Maintenance of Two Implant-Retained Overdentures Reinforced With PEKK Versus Co-Cr Frameworks
NCT06219811 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Effect of Adding Zirconium Oxide Nanoparticles to Printable Implant Overdenture
NCT06116877 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Two Years Follow up of Polyetheretherketone (PEEK) Sub-periosteal Implant Retaining Maxillary Fixed Prosthesis
NCT05193110 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
3D-Printed Implant Overdentures: Comparing Impression Techniques
NCT07208812 ·Status: RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
All on Six Versus Parallel Implant Distribution for Maxillary Denture Opposing Mandibular All on Four
NCT05960500 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
All on Four Versus All on Three Implant Treatment Concepts
NCT05912127 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Trueness of Full Arch Scans and Generated Digital Implant Models
NCT06281002 ·Status: NOT_YET_RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
3D Integration of Facial , Intraoral Scanning and CBCT on Patient Satisfaction and Occlusion of Temporary, Permanent Implant Supported Prosthesis
NCT06846372 ·Status: ACTIVE_NOT_RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Titanium Versus Soft Metal CAD/CAM Frameworks for All-on-4 Implant Supported Prosthesis
NCT06114966 ·Status: RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Patient Satisfaction , Prosthetic Complications and Clinical Outcomes of PEEK Composite Versus Titanium Zirconium
NCT06111391 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Two Versus Four Implant-supported Fixed Full-arch Prosthesis
NCT05290766 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Evaluation of Peri-Implant Tissues of Different Implant Assisted Overdentures
NCT06647199 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Biomechanical Effects of Digitally Constructed Subperiosteal Implants
NCT06362057 ·Status: RECRUITING
-
Effect of Geometric Modifications of Implant Scan Bodies
NCT06040385 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Digital Intraoral Scanning With and Without Prefabricated Landmarks Versus Conventional Impression Technique
NCT06592066 ·Status: NOT_YET_RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Clinical Performance and Stability of Different Types of Implant Supported Overdenture
NCT05972538 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Evaluation of Digital Versus Conventional Techniques for Construction of Mandibular Implant Retained Overdenture
NCT06139003 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
"Comparative Study of Supra-Structure Materials in Full-Arch Implant Prosthetics: a Randomized Clinical Trial"
NCT06673355 ·Status: ACTIVE_NOT_RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Evaluation of Masticatory Performance and Patient Satisfaction for Conventional and 3D Printed Implant Overdentures
NCT06148727 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Accuracy and Scannability of Implant-Supported Framework Materials
NCT06423482 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Digital Versus Conventional Impression CAD\CAM Constructed 4- Implant Supported Mandibular Overdenture Base
NCT06071676 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Digital Evaluation of Accuracy for Removable Partial Denture Frameworks
NCT06412159 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA