Abutment Analysis of Metallic Denture Frameworks in Mandibular Kenedy Class III Cases
NCT07215208 · Status: NOT_YET_RECRUITING · Phase: NA · Type: INTERVENTIONAL · Enrollment: 22
Last updated 2025-10-10
Summary
This study is aimed to compare CAD/CAM (digitally fabricated) metallic partial denture frameworks to conventionally fabricated metallic partial denture frameworks in mandibular Kennedy class-III arches in terms of abutment health and occlusal analysis
Conditions
- Occlusion
- Prosthesis Durability
Interventions
- OTHER
-
CAD/CAM metallic partial denture frameworks
The CAD/CAM workflow starts with scanning of the physical model (master cast) to create a 3D virtual representation. Dental professionals then digitally analyze this virtual model and design the metallic partial denture frameworks using specialized computer software. Once the design is finalized, a wax pattern of the framework is either milled or 3D printed. Then proceeding with this wax pattern to fabricate the final metal partial denture framework, either by conventional casting process, or milling of the metallic framework
- OTHER
-
Conventional metallic partial denture frameworks
The metallic partial denture frameworks have proven to be affordable and convenient treatment option for partially dentate patients for it is rigidity and durability. It can be used in thin sections and provide high strength and stiffness. However, metallic partial denture frameworks also come with several drawbacks. A significant concern for some patients is the metallic display, which can lead to poor esthetics. Other disadvantages include increased prosthesis weight, a potential metallic taste, and a tendency for plaque accumulation. Additionally, they can induce stresses on the abutment teeth
Sponsors & Collaborators
-
Cairo University
lead OTHER
Study Design
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Masking
- TRIPLE
- Model
- CROSSOVER
Eligibility
- Sex
- ALL
- Healthy Volunteers
- Yes
Timeline & Regulatory
- Start
- 2025-10-31
- Primary Completion
- 2026-01-31
- Completion
- 2026-01-31
More Related Trials
-
Comparison Between Injection Molded Polyetheretherketone (PEEK) Framework and Cobalt Chromium Framework Removable Partial Dentures Regarding Periodontal Health of Abutment Teeth
NCT03777345 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Periodontal Health and Patient Satisfaction of CAD/CAM Fiber-Reinforced vs. PFM Attachments in Distal Extension RPDs
NCT06871020 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Clinical Performance of Metal Ceramic Fixed Dental Prostheses Using Two Porcelain Veneering Systems: A Randomized Clinical Trial
NCT07029880 ·Status: RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
3D-Printed Implant Overdentures: Comparing Impression Techniques
NCT07208812 ·Status: RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Comparison Between Single Implant Retained Partial Over-denture and Conventional Partial Denture
NCT03324789 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Accuracy of 3D Printed Complete Dentures Using Two Impression Techniques: RCT
NCT04982510 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Single-retainer Lithium Di-silicate Versus Zirconia Resin Bonded Bridge for Replacement of an Anterior Missing Tooth.
NCT05861921 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Oral Health Related Quality of Life in Cad Metallic and Poly Ether Ether Ketone (Peek) Partial Denture Frameworks in Mandibular Kennedy Class I Cases
NCT06789627 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Polyetheretherketone vs Cobalt-chromium Telescopic Removable Partial Denture in Kennedy Class I Patients Regarding Oral Health Related Quality of Life
NCT03771248 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Socket Shield vs Conventional Immediate Implant
NCT03587597 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Clinical Assessment of CAD/CAM Monolithic Complete Denture
NCT07091552 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Study of Wear in Composite Resin and Reinforced Acrylic Denture Teeth Used in Complete Denture Construction for Completely Edentulous Patients
NCT04839640 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Conventional Versus Neutral-Zone CAD/CAM Dentures Restoring Mandibular Resorbed Ridges
NCT05895292 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
PEEK Versus Metallic Framework for Extra Coronal Attachment
NCT04990453 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Porcelain-fused-to-metal Versus Zirconia Implant- Supported in Mandibular Kennedy Class II
NCT06150768 ·Status: RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Bone Changes Assessment in Screw-Retained Maxillary Complete Denture With Electric Welded Framework Versus Cast One
NCT04548258 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Compare the Difference in Occlusal Force Distribution and Denture Retention Using 2 Different Denture Base Materials in Implant Retained Overdenture
NCT07250503 ·Status: ACTIVE_NOT_RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Customized CAD/CAM Titanium-Milled Abutments Vs. Custom Abutments Over Immediate Implants in Class II Extraction Sockets in the Esthetic Zone: a Randomized Controlled Clinical Trial
NCT06791655 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: PHASE2
-
Treatment of Peri-implant Bone Dehiscence Using Autogenous Tooth Plate
NCT06313216 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Screw-retained Maxillary Complete Denture With Electric Welded Metal Framework Versus Cast One, Patient Satisfaction Assessment.
NCT04539210 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Passive Fit of CAD/CAM Screw-retained Metal Frameworks Versus Screwmented Ones
NCT04372901 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Patient Satisfaction & Retention of Milled, 3D Printed and Conventional Complete Dentures
NCT03281603 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Microbial Adhesion to Metallic Versus Non Metallic Surfaces of Bounded Removable Partial Denture
NCT03008317 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Digital Evaluation of Accuracy for Removable Partial Denture Frameworks
NCT06412159 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Denture Retention of Intra-orally Scanned Versus Extra-orally Scanned Digitally Printed Maxillary Denture in Completely Edentulous Patients
NCT07290322 ·Status: ACTIVE_NOT_RECRUITING ·Phase: NA