Mandibular Overdentures vs All-on-4 With PEEK
NCT07137533 · Status: RECRUITING · Type: OBSERVATIONAL · Enrollment: 40
Last updated 2025-08-22
Summary
This study compares long-term peri-implant outcomes between two mandibular full-arch rehabilitation approaches-four-implant-retained overdentures and All-on-4 fixed prostheses-when both are fabricated with polyetheretherketone (PEEK) frameworks. While overdentures and All-on-4 prostheses are widely used, evidence on the clinical performance of PEEK frameworks in these modalities is scarce. By evaluating marginal bone loss and other peri-implant parameters, the research aims to clarify whether prosthetic design influences biological outcomes when using this high-performance polymer.
Conditions
- Bone Loss in Jaw
Interventions
- OTHER
-
Mandibular Four-Implant-Retained Overdenture (PEEK Framework); Mandibular All-on-4 Fixed Prosthesis (PEEK Framework)
Group I: Four-implant-retained mandibular overdenture with a CAD/CAM-milled PEEK framework and acrylic denture teeth, retained via attachment mechanisms; implants placed in lateral incisor and first premolar sites; delayed loading protocol. Group II: Mandibular All-on-4 fixed prosthesis with a CAD/CAM-milled PEEK framework and acrylic denture teeth; two anterior straight and two posterior tilted implants placed in lateral incisor and first premolar sites; delayed loading protocol.
Sponsors & Collaborators
-
Mansoura University
collaborator OTHER -
Menoufia University
lead OTHER
Eligibility
- Min Age
- 40 Years
- Max Age
- 70 Years
- Sex
- ALL
- Healthy Volunteers
- No
Timeline & Regulatory
- Start
- 2025-08-01
- Primary Completion
- 2025-10-01
- Completion
- 2025-10-25
Countries
- Egypt
Study Locations
More Related Trials
-
Comparison Between Injection Molded Polyetheretherketone (PEEK) Framework and Cobalt Chromium Framework Removable Partial Dentures Regarding Periodontal Health of Abutment Teeth
NCT03777345 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Prosthetic Maintenance of Two Implant-Retained Overdentures Reinforced With PEKK Versus Co-Cr Frameworks
NCT06219811 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Prosthetic Complications in Fixed All-On-Four Prosthesis Reinforced with Poly Ether Ether Ketone (PEEK) Versus Cobalt Chromium (Co-Cr) Framework
NCT06631573 ·Status: ACTIVE_NOT_RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Patient Satisfaction and Oral Healthy Related Quality of Life of Polyetherketoneketone and Metal Framework.
NCT05904756 ·Status: RECRUITING
-
Comparison Between Injection Molded PEEK Framework and Cobalt Chromium Framework Removable Partial Dentures Regarding Biting Force
NCT03777423 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Comparing Marginal Bone Loss for Immediately Loaded Implants in Maxillary Full Arch Interim Prosthesis Using Welded Titanium Bar Versus Polyetheretherketone Bar
NCT06127017 ·Status: NOT_YET_RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Two Years Follow up of Polyetheretherketone (PEEK) Sub-periosteal Implant Retaining Maxillary Fixed Prosthesis
NCT05193110 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
PEEK Versus Metallic Framework for Extra Coronal Attachment
NCT04990453 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
PEEK Prostheses in the All-on-4 Concept Using Zygomatic Implants for Full-arch Rehabilitation.
NCT05589545 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Four Implant Retained Mandibular Overdenture VERSUS Fixed-detachable Prosthesis.
NCT07144787 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
3D-Printed Implant Overdentures: Comparing Impression Techniques
NCT07208812 ·Status: RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Evaluation of PEEK Versus Titanium Bar Attachments With Implant Assisted Mandibular Complete Overdenture Fabricated by CAD/CAM Technology
NCT07262307 ·Status: ACTIVE_NOT_RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Digital Versus Conventional Altered Cast Techniques For Constructing Mandibular Distal Extension Removable Partial Dentures Using Digitally Fabricated Frameworks: Alveolar Bone Height Changes
NCT05899712 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Comparison Between Injection Molded PEEK Framework and Cobalt Chromium Framework in Removable Partial Denture Regarding Retention
NCT03777280 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Clinical Performance and Stability of Different Types of Implant Supported Overdenture
NCT05972538 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Hybrid Polyetheretherketone (PEEK)-Acrylic Resin Prostheses and the All-on-4 Concept for Full Arch Rehabilitation
NCT04446078 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Complete Digital Workflow
NCT07091786 ·Status: ENROLLING_BY_INVITATION ·Phase: PHASE2/PHASE3
-
Evaluation of Marginal Bone Loss of Two Immediately Loaded Implants Retaining Mandibular Overdenture
NCT06150755 ·Status: NOT_YET_RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
All on Six Versus Parallel Implant Distribution for Maxillary Denture Opposing Mandibular All on Four
NCT05960500 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Hybrid PEEK-Acrylic Resin Prostheses and the All-on-4 Concept for Full-Arch Rehabilitation - Routine Group
NCT05589493 ·Status: ACTIVE_NOT_RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Trueness of Full Arch Scans and Generated Digital Implant Models
NCT06281002 ·Status: NOT_YET_RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
All on Four Versus All on Three Implant Treatment Concepts
NCT05912127 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Patient Satisfaction and Oral Health-Related Quality of Life of Quadrilateral Versus Bilateral Linear Bar Designs for Four Implant Implant-Assisted Complete Mandibular Overdenture Regarding Peri-Implant Crestal Bone Loss
NCT06673173 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Crestal Bone Loss in Mandibular Telescopic Overdentures. Overdenture with Milled Titanium, Milled Poly-ether Ketone Ketones and 3D Printed Chrome Cobalt Secondary Copings.
NCT06639893 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: EARLY_PHASE1
-
Comparative Evaluation Between One-piece and Two-piece Implants Supporting Mandibular Screw-retained All-On-Four Full-arch Prosthesis on Peri-implant Bone Changes.
NCT06790524 ·Status: NOT_YET_RECRUITING ·Phase: NA