Comparative Evaluation Between One-piece and Two-piece Implants Supporting Mandibular Screw-retained All-On-Four Full-arch Prosthesis on Peri-implant Bone Changes.
NCT06790524 · Status: NOT_YET_RECRUITING · Phase: NA · Type: INTERVENTIONAL · Enrollment: 22
Last updated 2025-03-07
Summary
Evaluating the bone changing after receiving one-piece implants supported full arch prosthesis compared to the conventional two-piece implants.
Conditions
- Marginal Bone Loss
- One-piece Implants Versus Two-piece Implants During the Osseointegration Phase
Interventions
- DEVICE
-
One-piece dental implants with MUA
one-piece dental implants with multi-units abutment mounted on the implants as a single piece provided with different abutment angulation utilizing these implants for All-On-Four prothesis
- DEVICE
-
Two-piece dental implants
Surgical and immediate loading procedures: On the day of implant placement, patients will receive two-piece implant. After crestal incision and full-thickness flap elevation, the implant sites will be prepared aided by a surgical template. 4 implants will be placed, two aligned in an axial orientation and two will be distally aligned (17 degrees). The standard placement procedure as recommended by the manufacturer will be used. The surgical drills with increasing diameters will be used to prepare the implant sites. Implants will be ideally placed at bone level (or 1 mm deeper depending on the soft tissue thickness). After 3 months as a healing phase, a definitive prosthesis will be fabricated using the same abutments, and the marginal bone loss after the osseointegration phase will be assessed.
Sponsors & Collaborators
-
Cairo University
lead OTHER
Study Design
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Masking
- DOUBLE
- Model
- PARALLEL
Eligibility
- Min Age
- 18 Years
- Max Age
- 70 Years
- Sex
- ALL
- Healthy Volunteers
- No
Timeline & Regulatory
- Start
- 2025-03-31
- Primary Completion
- 2025-03-31
- Completion
- 2025-10-31
Countries
- Egypt
Study Locations
More Related Trials
-
Effect of PEEK and Co-Cr Framework Reinforcement on Marginal Bone Loss Around Implants Supporting a Fixed All-on-four Prosthesis in Completely Edentulous Mandibles. A Randomized Controlled Clinial Trial
NCT06591611 ·Status: ACTIVE_NOT_RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Edentulous Maxilla Opposed by 2-implant Mandibular Overdenture?
NCT06050213 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Complete Digital Workflow for Construction of Full Arch Implant Supported Screw Retained Restoration
NCT06332482 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Two-piece Versus Single-piece Patient-specific Titanium Subperiosteal Implants
NCT03242330 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Evaluation Of Marginal Bone Height Changes And Biting Force In Screw Retained Implant Prostheses Using Reinforced Resin Vs Monolithic Zirconium
NCT07007572 ·Status: RECRUITING ·Phase: PHASE2
-
Survival Rate of 2 Implant-supported Short-span Fixed Partial Dentures
NCT06447792 ·Status: RECRUITING
-
Implant Retained Overdenture VERSUS Implant Canine Retained Overdenture.
NCT07046104 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Evaluation of Peri-Implant Tissues of Different Implant Assisted Overdentures
NCT06647199 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Comparison Between Single Implant Retained Partial Over-denture and Conventional Partial Denture
NCT03324789 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Clinical Evaluation of Stability of Implants Placed in Partially Edentulous Maxilla With Poor Bone Quality Via New Reverse Drilling Technique Versus Osteotome Technique.
NCT04541641 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Radiographic Evaluation of All-on-4 Implant Prosthesis With Different Materials and Bar Construction Techniques
NCT06071689 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Compare the Difference in Occlusal Force Distribution and Denture Retention Using 2 Different Denture Base Materials in Implant Retained Overdenture
NCT07250503 ·Status: ACTIVE_NOT_RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Effect of Concentrated Growth Factors on Short Implant-Supported Overdentures
NCT06880965 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: PHASE2/PHASE3
-
Modified Periosteal Inhibition with Simultaneous Implant Placement in Aesthetic Zone
NCT06519773 ·Status: RECRUITING ·Phase: PHASE1/PHASE2
-
Clinical Evaluation of Biological Drilling Osteotomy Protocol Versus Conventional Drilling Osteotomy Protocol
NCT06992557 ·Status: NOT_YET_RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Assessment of Bone Volume Changes in Immediate Implant Placement Using Allograft Versus Xenograft in Mandibular Molars
NCT06962878 ·Status: NOT_YET_RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Four-unit Implant Supported Fixed Partial Dentures Fabricated From Different Materials
NCT06422260 ·Status: RECRUITING
-
Clinical and Radiographic Evaluation of Implant Stability in Healed Maxillary Posterior Sites Comparing Osteotome, Osseodensification and Conventional Drilling Implant Placement Techniques
NCT06599112 ·Status: RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Patient Satisfaction and Crestal Bone Changes Around One-piece Zirconia(Zr) and Titanium(Ti) in Implant-Retained Mandibular Overdenture
NCT06643975 ·Status: RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Peri-implant Bone Behaviour Using Two Drilling Techniques in Posterior Maxilla
NCT06770231 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Evaluation of the Effect of Osseodensefication Technique Versus Conventional Implant Drilling Technique in Implant Supported Mandibular Overdenture
NCT06590753 ·Status: RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Occlusion and Disocclusion Time in Immediately Loaded Overdentures Supported by Two Splinted Versus Non Splinted Interforaminal Implants
NCT06376019 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Evaluation of Marginal Bone Loss of Two Immediately Loaded Implants Retaining Mandibular Overdenture
NCT06150755 ·Status: NOT_YET_RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
SFI Bars and Milled Bars Supporting Mandibular Overdentures. Three-year Randomized Clinical Trial
NCT06620497 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Evaluation of the Effect of Different Thread Designs on Primary Stability of Dental Implant Using Osseodensification Technique in Posterior Maxilla : Randomized Clinical Trial
NCT07242716 ·Status: NOT_YET_RECRUITING ·Phase: NA