Comparison Between the Effect of Using Conventional and Digital Oral Positional Radiation Stent
NCT06353724 · Status: COMPLETED · Phase: NA · Type: INTERVENTIONAL · Enrollment: 16
Last updated 2024-04-09
Summary
The goal of this clinical trial is to compare between the Effect of Using Conventional and Digital Oral Positional Radiation Stent on Healthy tissues, salivary PH. The main question it aims to answer are: Does the difference in manufacturing method affect on Healthy tissues, salivary PH.
Participants will use radiation positioning stent during radiotherapy sessions Two groups will be compared
* Group A: OPRS was constructed according to the conventional technique.
* Group B: OPRS was constructed digitally using CAD /CAM technology. to evaluate Dosimetric analysis to quantify the radiation dose in OARs, PH of saliva measurement and Mucositis assessment.
Conditions
- Radiotherapy Side Effect
Interventions
- DEVICE
-
conventional oral positioning stent were used during radiation planning and the PTV will be defined and contoured in computed tomography pre irradiation planning
Dosimetric analysis: the maxilla (area of the teeth), both parotid glands (ipsilateral and contralateral), the mandible, and the PTV were defined and contoured in computed tomography pre irradiation planning. The mean corresponding dose of each structure were acquired using a dose-volume histogram. All patients will complete the radiotherapy sessions using the positional radiation prosthesis. Mucositis assessment: The severity of mucositis will be assessed weekly from the beginning of RT to the end of the treatment (mean time, 7 weeks). It will be scored in accordance with the classification criteria of the National Cancer Institute. PH of saliva measurement: Collection of saliva sample were done from each patient to measure salivary PH by digital PH meter before beginning of radiotherapy and the measurement will be continued weekly till the end of the treatment.
- DEVICE
-
Digital positioning stent
Digital positioning stent
Sponsors & Collaborators
-
Tanta University
lead OTHER
Study Design
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Purpose
- SUPPORTIVE_CARE
- Masking
- NONE
- Model
- PARALLEL
Eligibility
- Min Age
- 20 Years
- Max Age
- 70 Years
- Sex
- ALL
- Healthy Volunteers
- Yes
Timeline & Regulatory
- Start
- 2019-10-14
- Primary Completion
- 2020-10-01
- Completion
- 2021-01-01
Countries
- Egypt
Study Locations
More Related Trials
-
3D Integration of Facial , Intraoral Scanning and CBCT on Patient Satisfaction and Occlusion of Temporary, Permanent Implant Supported Prosthesis
NCT06846372 ·Status: ACTIVE_NOT_RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
3D-Printed Implant Overdentures: Comparing Impression Techniques
NCT07208812 ·Status: RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Comparison Between Injection Molded Polyetheretherketone (PEEK) Framework and Cobalt Chromium Framework Removable Partial Dentures Regarding Periodontal Health of Abutment Teeth
NCT03777345 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Evaluation of PEEK Versus Titanium Bar Attachments With Implant Assisted Mandibular Complete Overdenture Fabricated by CAD/CAM Technology
NCT07262307 ·Status: ACTIVE_NOT_RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Clinical and Radiographic Assessment of PRF Versus Lutein Placement
NCT06358352 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Fully Versus Partially Guided Implants Placement: Measurement of Accuracy of Implant Position and Passivity of Superstructures.
NCT07174791 ·Status: ACTIVE_NOT_RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Comparison Between Injection Molded PEEK Framework and Cobalt Chromium Framework Removable Partial Dentures Regarding Biting Force
NCT03777423 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Three Years Radiographic Evaluation of Different Implant Retained Complete Over Denture Attachments (In Vivo Study)
NCT06962358 ·Status: COMPLETED
-
Accuracy of 3D Printed Maxillary Complete Dentures
NCT03613896 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Digital Versus Conventional Full-arch Implant Impression in Maxillary Screw- Retained Implant Prosthesis
NCT05709236 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
"Patient Satisfaction with Intra-Oral Vs. Extra-Oral Scanned 3D-Printed Dentures: an in Vivo Study"
NCT06846619 ·Status: RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Patient Satisfaction, Peri-implant Parameters and Crestal Bone Evaluation of PEEK (Polyetheretherketone) Abutments Versus Zirconium Abutments Restored With PEEK Based Superstructure
NCT03714074 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Evaluation of Digital 3D Printed Temporary Removable Partial Denture.
NCT06106243 ·Status: RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Evaluation of Peri-Implant Tissues of Different Implant Assisted Overdentures
NCT06647199 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Prosthetic Complications in Fixed All-On-Four Prosthesis Reinforced with Poly Ether Ether Ketone (PEEK) Versus Cobalt Chromium (Co-Cr) Framework
NCT06631573 ·Status: ACTIVE_NOT_RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Complete Digital Workflow for Construction of Full Arch Implant Supported Screw Retained Restoration
NCT06332482 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Short vs Long Dental Implants for the Fixed Rehabilitation of the Fully Edentulous Mandible
NCT03509402 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Cost-effectiveness of the Single-implant Mandibular Overdenture Versus Mandibular Conventional Denture
NCT03463174 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Patient Satisfaction for Digital Versus Conventional Maxillary Obturator
NCT05920811 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Comparison Between Digital And Direct Pickup Of Attachments With Digitally Constructed 2-Implant Overdenture Bases
NCT07238335 ·Status: ACTIVE_NOT_RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
3D -Printed Single Implant Overdentures
NCT04366895 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Comparative Clinical Study for Two Types of Locator Attachments for Mandibular Implant Supported Overdenture
NCT06109519 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Bio-implant Root Analogue Versus Conventional Screw-type Implant for Management of Pier Abutment in Mandibular Distal Extension Cases
NCT07284680 ·Status: ACTIVE_NOT_RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Ultra-wide Diameter Implants in Mandibular Molars
NCT05972447 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Comparison of Conventional Versus 3-D Printed Complete Denture Regarding Retention, Accuracy, Elctromyographic Activity and Patient Satisfaction.
NCT05834530 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA