MedTrace Logo

Digital Versus Conventional Full-arch Implant Impression in Maxillary Screw- Retained Implant Prosthesis

NCT05709236 · Status: COMPLETED · Phase: NA · Type: INTERVENTIONAL · Enrollment: 28

Last updated 2023-02-02

No results posted yet for this study

Summary

28 participants with edentulous maxillary arches were randomly selected and enrolled in two equal groups; Group I conventional impression group (CIG) and Group II Digital impression group (DIG). All patients were rehabilitated with maxillary screw-retained implant prosthesis retained by 6 implants. Prosthodontic complications and peri-implant MBL were registered at 6,12, and 24 months (m). Data was collected and statistically analyzed.

Conditions

  • Jaw, Edentulous

Interventions

DEVICE

Maxillary screw-retained prosthesis

Maxillary screw-retained prosthesis with conventional full-arch impression with conventional or digital impression

Sponsors & Collaborators

  • Delta University for Science and Technology

    lead OTHER

Principal Investigators

  • Wafaa Ibrahim, PHD · Assoc. Prof.

Study Design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
SINGLE
Model
PARALLEL

Eligibility

Min Age
56 Years
Max Age
70 Years
Sex
ALL
Healthy Volunteers
No

Timeline & Regulatory

Start
2020-01-05
Primary Completion
2022-05-10
Completion
2022-08-10

Countries

  • Egypt

Study Locations

More Related Trials

Read the full study record

This page highlights key information. For complete eligibility criteria, study locations, investigator contacts, and the full protocol, visit the original record on ClinicalTrials.gov.

View NCT05709236 on ClinicalTrials.gov