Bio-implant Root Analogue Versus Conventional Screw-type Implant for Management of Pier Abutment in Mandibular Distal Extension Cases
NCT07284680 · Status: ACTIVE_NOT_RECRUITING · Phase: NA · Type: INTERVENTIONAL · Enrollment: 8
Last updated 2025-12-16
Summary
reviewing literature was lacking for bio implant and management of pier abutment in distal extension bases for this reason the aim of this research will be to use the bio implant in the management of pier abutment cases for distal extension denture base cases Aim of the study the aim of this study was to evaluate and compare the bioimplant root analogue implant with the conventional screw type implant the evaluation was done 0,3 and 6months of definitive prosthesis insertion regarding the following
1. radiographic evaluation of the alveolar bone hight as related to the bio implant ,conventional screw implant , pier abutment and RPD abutments : this will be done using standardized periapical digital radiographs
2. soft tissue evaluatins related to the bio implant ,conventional screw implant , pier abutment and RPD abutments this will be done using : A . modified plaque index (MPI) B . modified gingival index (MGI) C . peridontal pocket depth
Conditions
- Implant Assesment
Interventions
- DEVICE
-
Implant
construction of prothesis related to bioimplant or conventional implant
Sponsors & Collaborators
-
Mansoura University
lead OTHER
Study Design
- Allocation
- NON_RANDOMIZED
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Masking
- DOUBLE
- Model
- PARALLEL
Eligibility
- Min Age
- 45 Years
- Max Age
- 65 Years
- Sex
- ALL
- Healthy Volunteers
- Yes
Timeline & Regulatory
- Start
- 2022-12-19
- Primary Completion
- 2025-12-30
- Completion
- 2025-12-30
Countries
- Egypt
Study Locations
More Related Trials
-
3D-Printed Implant Overdentures: Comparing Impression Techniques
NCT07208812 ·Status: RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Comparison Between Digital And Direct Pickup Of Attachments With Digitally Constructed 2-Implant Overdenture Bases
NCT07238335 ·Status: ACTIVE_NOT_RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Comparative Evaluation Between One-piece and Two-piece Implants Supporting Mandibular Screw-retained All-On-Four Full-arch Prosthesis on Peri-implant Bone Changes.
NCT06790524 ·Status: NOT_YET_RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Evaluation of Peri-Implant Tissues of Different Implant Assisted Overdentures
NCT06647199 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Accuracy of Conventional and Digital Impression Techniques Used for Maxillary Hybrid Prosthesis
NCT05321589 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Modified Periosteal Inhibition with Simultaneous Implant Placement in Aesthetic Zone
NCT06519773 ·Status: RECRUITING ·Phase: PHASE1/PHASE2
-
Immediate Implant With Different Filling Materials
NCT05878392 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Compressive Single-piece Implants for Immediate Rehabilitation of Edentulous Maxillectomy Patients
NCT06572891 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Comparative Evaluation of Masticatory Efficiency of Implant Supported Overdenture
NCT05877092 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Biomechanical Effects of Digitally Constructed Subperiosteal Implants
NCT06362057 ·Status: RECRUITING
-
Immediate Loading of Four Single Piece Compressive Implants for Bar Retained Mandibular Overdenture
NCT06514391 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Effect of Different Implant Surface Treatments on Bony Changes Around Mandibular Implants
NCT04686370 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
A Study Comparing Two Different Denture Base Materials in Implant Retained Overdentures
NCT07271641 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Clinical Evaluation of Biological Drilling Osteotomy Protocol Versus Conventional Drilling Osteotomy Protocol
NCT06992557 ·Status: NOT_YET_RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
3D Integration of Facial , Intraoral Scanning and CBCT on Patient Satisfaction and Occlusion of Temporary, Permanent Implant Supported Prosthesis
NCT06846372 ·Status: ACTIVE_NOT_RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Radiographic Evaluation of All-on-4 Implant Prosthesis With Different Materials and Bar Construction Techniques
NCT06071689 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Mandibular Implant Overdenture With OT Cap Bar vs Bar Attachment
NCT07067190 ·Status: NOT_YET_RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Accuracy of 3-dimensional Printed Implant Cast Versus Conventional Stone Cast for Edentulous Mandibular Arch
NCT06050187 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
PEEK Retentive Elements Versus Conventional
NCT05079048 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Effect of PEEK and Co-Cr Framework Reinforcement on Marginal Bone Loss Around Implants Supporting a Fixed All-on-four Prosthesis in Completely Edentulous Mandibles. A Randomized Controlled Clinial Trial
NCT06591611 ·Status: ACTIVE_NOT_RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Comparative Clinical Study for Two Types of Locator Attachments for Mandibular Implant Supported Overdenture
NCT06109519 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
IMMEDIATE IMPLANT With Different Types of Membranes
NCT06657651 ·Status: ENROLLING_BY_INVITATION ·Phase: NA
-
Clinical and Radiographic Evaluation of The Effect of Acetal Resin Versus PEEK on Supporting Structure of Abutment Teeth
NCT06882161 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: PHASE3
-
Retention of Metal Reinforced Polyamide Denture Base and Heat Cured Acrylic Resin Denture Base in Complete Mandibular Denture
NCT03385746 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Evaluation of PEEK Versus Titanium Bar Attachments With Implant Assisted Mandibular Complete Overdenture Fabricated by CAD/CAM Technology
NCT07262307 ·Status: ACTIVE_NOT_RECRUITING ·Phase: NA