MedTrace Logo

Short vs Long Dental Implants for the Fixed Rehabilitation of the Fully Edentulous Mandible

NCT03509402 · Status: COMPLETED · Phase: NA · Type: INTERVENTIONAL · Enrollment: 30

Last updated 2025-01-13

Study results available
· View outcomes & findings →

Summary

The aim of this study is to clinically and radiographically compare the performance of short (6 mm-long) versus long (≥11 mm-long) dental implants placed in the interforaminal region of fully edentulous mandibles, supporting a screw-retained full-arch cantilever bridge.

Conditions

  • Edentulous Jaw

Interventions

DEVICE

ASTRA TECH Implant System, OsseoSpeed™ 4.0 S, length: 6 mm

Rehabilitation of the edentulous mandible by a full-arch srew-retained prosthesis with distal cantilevers supported by five interforaminal short implants (ASTRA TECH Implant System, OsseoSpeed™ 4.0 S, length: 6 mm)

DEVICE

ASTRA TECH Implant System, OsseoSpeed™ 4.0 S, length: ≥11mm

Rehabilitation of the edentulous mandible by a full-arch srew-retained prosthesis with distal cantilevers supported by five interforaminal long implants (ASTRA TECH Implant System, OsseoSpeed™ 4.0 S, length: ≥11mm)

Sponsors & Collaborators

  • Dentsply Sirona Implants and Consumables

    collaborator INDUSTRY

  • University of Campania Luigi Vanvitelli

    lead OTHER

Principal Investigators

  • Luigi Guida, Prof · University of Campania Luigi Vanvitelli

Study Design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
SINGLE
Model
PARALLEL

Eligibility

Min Age
18 Years
Max Age
75 Years
Sex
ALL
Healthy Volunteers
No

Timeline & Regulatory

Start
2010-01-31
Primary Completion
2021-02-28
Completion
2021-02-28

More Related Trials

Read the full study record

This page highlights key information. For complete eligibility criteria, study locations, investigator contacts, and the full protocol, visit the original record on ClinicalTrials.gov.

View NCT03509402 on ClinicalTrials.gov