Patient Satisfaction and Dimensional Accuracy of Bre Flex and Peek for Removable Partial Dentures
NCT03025555 · Status: UNKNOWN · Phase: NA · Type: INTERVENTIONAL · Enrollment: 12
Last updated 2017-02-02
Summary
Evaluation the patient satisfaction and dimensional stability of upper removable partial denture constructed from two different flexible thermoplastic materials.(BRE-FLEX and PEEK).
Conditions
- Patient Satisfaction
Interventions
- OTHER
-
PEEK
Polyetheretherketone (PEEK) is a synthetic, tooth colored polymeric material that has been used as a biomaterial in orthopedics for many years but recently used as removable prosthetic material. Advantages of this polymer material are elimination of allergic reactions, high polishing qualities, low plaque affinity, and good wear resistance. It has been proven that it shows high mechanical and biological properties. Studies evaluating the properties of this material are limited and need more clinical tests.
- OTHER
-
Bre.flex
Bre.flex is a nylon-based thermoplastic material, composed of nylon PA 12 (polyamide).Nylon exhibits high physical strength, heat resistance and chemical resistance. It can be easily modified to increase stiffness and wear resistance. Nylon resin can be semi-translucent and provides excellent esthetics but it is a little more difficult to adjust and polish.
Sponsors & Collaborators
-
Cairo University
lead OTHER
Study Design
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Purpose
- OTHER
- Masking
- TRIPLE
- Model
- PARALLEL
Eligibility
- Min Age
- 45 Years
- Max Age
- 55 Years
- Sex
- ALL
- Healthy Volunteers
- Yes
Timeline & Regulatory
- Start
- 2017-03-30
- Primary Completion
- 2017-08-31
- Completion
- 2017-10-31
More Related Trials
-
Evaluation of Chewing Efficiency of Conventional Complete Denture in Comparison to Reinforced Poly Amide Denture
NCT03391063 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Measuring Biting Force of Poly-amide Complete Dentures
NCT03253510 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Evaluation of Candida Albicans Growth on BreFlex Versus PEEK Denture Base in Maxillary Bounded Partial Denture
NCT03462862 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Polyetheretherketone vs Cobalt-chromium Telescopic Removable Partial Denture in Kennedy Class I Patients Regarding Oral Health Related Quality of Life
NCT03771248 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Accuracy of 3D Printed Complete Dentures Using Two Impression Techniques: RCT
NCT04982510 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Patient Satisfaction , Marginal Adaptation And Biocompatibility of Milled Biohpp Polyetheretherketone (PEEK) Single Anterior Crowns Veneered With Two Different Techniques.
NCT04914325 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: PHASE4
-
A Study Comparing Two Different Denture Base Materials in Implant Retained Overdentures
NCT07271641 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
(PEEK) Housing Verses Metallic Housing of Ball and Socket Attachment on Retention of Mandibular Overdenture
NCT02950662 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Immediate Implant Placement With Different Materials of Customized Healing Abutment for Guiding Peri-implant Soft Tissue Healing in Posterior Teeth
NCT06645444 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Evaluation of Digital 3D Printed Temporary Removable Partial Denture.
NCT06106243 ·Status: RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Patient Satisfaction and Adaptation of Dentures Printed at 0 Versus 45 Degrees
NCT06164366 ·Status: NOT_YET_RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Comparison Between Acrylic and Soft Liner Telescopic Overdentures Regarding Patient Satisfaction
NCT03127033 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Implant-Abutment Interface Design on Bone and Soft Tissue Levels Around Implants Placed Using Different Transcrestal Sinus Floor Elevation
NCT02953392 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
PEEK Versus PFM Implant Supported Superstructure
NCT03578913 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Comparison of Two Types of Splints to Treat Dental Luxation Injuries
NCT05305586 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Retention of Metal Reinforced Polyamide Denture Base and Heat Cured Acrylic Resin Denture Base in Complete Mandibular Denture
NCT03385746 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Patient Satisfaction, Peri-implant Parameters and Crestal Bone Evaluation of PEEK (Polyetheretherketone) Abutments Versus Zirconium Abutments Restored With PEEK Based Superstructure
NCT03714074 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Comparison of Conventional Versus 3-D Printed Complete Denture Regarding Retention, Accuracy, Elctromyographic Activity and Patient Satisfaction.
NCT05834530 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Clinical and Radiographic Evaluation of The Effect of Acetal Resin Versus PEEK on Supporting Structure of Abutment Teeth
NCT06882161 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: PHASE3
-
Comparing Impression Techniques for Maxillary Complete Denture Retention
NCT06497621 ·Status: NOT_YET_RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Comparative Study Between Acrylic and Flexible Dentures
NCT03184883 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Treatment of Peri-implant Bone Dehiscence Using Autogenous Tooth Plate
NCT06313216 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Two-piece Versus Single-piece Patient-specific Titanium Subperiosteal Implants
NCT03242330 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Impression & Prosthesis Quality Made From Different Polyvinylsiloxane Impression Techniques
NCT05938400 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Biting Force and Chewing Efficiency of Complete Dentures.
NCT04793503 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA