MedTrace Logo

The Accuracy of Conventional Versus Digital Implant Impression Techniques

NCT04908618 · Status: UNKNOWN · Phase: NA · Type: INTERVENTIONAL · Enrollment: 8

Last updated 2021-06-01

No results posted yet for this study

Summary

Intraoral oral scanning significantly improves scanning accuracy compared to digitized conventional impression techniques. The digitized closed tray impression technique showed significantly more accurate results than the digitized open-tray impression technique in partially edentulous patients.

Conditions

  • Missing Teeth

Interventions

OTHER

digital impression for normal abutment

Accuracy of scan body impression

OTHER

open tray impression

Accuracy of open tray impression

OTHER

closed tray impression

Accuracy of closed tray impression

Sponsors & Collaborators

  • Mohamed Mahmoud Dohiem

    lead OTHER_GOV

Study Design

Allocation
NON_RANDOMIZED
Purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
SINGLE
Model
PARALLEL

Eligibility

Min Age
30 Years
Max Age
50 Years
Sex
MALE
Healthy Volunteers
Yes

Timeline & Regulatory

Start
2021-05-20
Primary Completion
2021-05-21
Completion
2021-05-22

Countries

  • Egypt

Study Locations

More Related Trials

Read the full study record

This page highlights key information. For complete eligibility criteria, study locations, investigator contacts, and the full protocol, visit the original record on ClinicalTrials.gov.

View NCT04908618 on ClinicalTrials.gov