MedTrace Logo

Digital vs Analog Impression in Cases of All-on-4 - Prosthesis

NCT04475913 · Status: COMPLETED · Phase: NA · Type: INTERVENTIONAL · Enrollment: 56

Last updated 2021-03-01

No results posted yet for this study

Summary

Fifty six patients were randomly enrolled in the study. Participants were randomly stratified into two control groups and two test groups, from which conventional pick up and digital impressions were made respectively. Patients of group 1 (CIG Axial) and 3 (DIG Axial) received 4 axial implants whereas, group 2 patients (CIG Tilted), and group 4 (DIG Tilted) received two anterior axial implants and two distal tilted implants.

All participants received hybrid dentures. Bone loss, implant loss, maintenance of prosthesis were evaluated at 6m,12m, and 24 months follow up period.

Conditions

  • Edentulous Mouth

Interventions

OTHER

DIG Axial

patients received 4 axial implants and digital impression

OTHER

DIG Tilted

received two anterior axial implants and two distal tilted implants, and digital impression

OTHER

CIG Axial

patients received 4 axial implants and conventional impression

OTHER

CIG Tilted

received two anterior axial implants and two distal tilted implants, and conventional impression

Sponsors & Collaborators

  • October University for Modern Sciences and Arts

    lead OTHER

Principal Investigators

  • Dina Elawady · Lecturer

Study Design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
SINGLE
Model
PARALLEL

Eligibility

Min Age
50 Years
Max Age
65 Years
Sex
ALL
Healthy Volunteers
No

Timeline & Regulatory

Start
2018-07-11
Primary Completion
2020-07-11
Completion
2020-08-20

Countries

  • Egypt

Study Locations

More Related Trials

Read the full study record

This page highlights key information. For complete eligibility criteria, study locations, investigator contacts, and the full protocol, visit the original record on ClinicalTrials.gov.

View NCT04475913 on ClinicalTrials.gov