Assessment of the Accuracy of Surgical Guide Designed From Dental Model Optical Scan Versus Impression Inversion With Markers Techniques in Computer Guided Implantology. Randomized Clinical Trial.
NCT03367949 · Status: UNKNOWN · Phase: NA · Type: INTERVENTIONAL · Enrollment: 10
Last updated 2017-12-12
Summary
Dental model cast accuracy can be affected by many variables as tray material, impression material and time elapsed before pouring the impression. All these factors would affect the accuracy of the surgical guide
Impression inversion with markers technique avoids the dimension changes that may happen from pouring of the dental model cast. Also it saves time as no need for optical scan of the model cast and for scan appliance even in cases of multiple restoration. Adding markers to impression tray ensures an accurate merge even if the patient has restored dentition that may cause scatter during the CT/CBCT scan.
This study will is for Assessment of the Accuracy of Surgical Guide designed from Dental Model Optical Scan versus Impression Inversion with Markers techniques in Computer Guided Implantology.
Conditions
- Accuracy of Surgical Guide in Computer Guided Implantology
Interventions
- OTHER
-
Surgical guide designed from Impression inversion with markers
Rather than using optical scan of the cast , We will use impression inversion technique with VPS impression and adding CBCT Markers on the tray
Sponsors & Collaborators
-
Cairo University
lead OTHER
Study Design
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Purpose
- OTHER
- Masking
- QUADRUPLE
- Model
- PARALLEL
Eligibility
- Sex
- ALL
- Healthy Volunteers
- Yes
Timeline & Regulatory
- Start
- 2017-07-01
- Primary Completion
- 2018-03-15
- Completion
- 2018-04-01
Countries
- Egypt
Study Locations
More Related Trials
-
Accuracy of 3D Printed Complete Dentures Using Two Impression Techniques: RCT
NCT04982510 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Accuracy Evaluation of Different "All on Four" Impression Techniques Using Plaster Jig
NCT06066892 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Surgical Guided Fabricated From Two Different Printing Materials
NCT06628492 ·Status: NOT_YET_RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Fully Guided Dental Implant Placement and Primary Stability
NCT07149987 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Accuracy of Computer Guided Four Implants Placement in Completely Edentulous Mandible
NCT06571968 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Accuracy of Trephination-based Versus Drilling-based Guided Dental Implant Placement
NCT05295082 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Influence of Digitalized Impression on Single Peri-implant Soft Tissue Profile
NCT06702969 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Patient Satisfaction and Adaptation of Dentures Printed at 0 Versus 45 Degrees
NCT06164366 ·Status: NOT_YET_RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Complete Denture Tooth Movement in Digital Light Processing Versus Conventional Fabrication Techniques
NCT04025697 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Accuracy of 3-dimensional Printed Implant Cast Versus Conventional Stone Cast for Edentulous Mandibular Arch
NCT06050187 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
DLP Versus SLM Stackable Surgical Guide
NCT05617443 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Comparing Dynamic Navigation to Static Navigation in the Implant Placement
NCT07291336 ·Status: RECRUITING ·Phase: PHASE4
-
Accuracy of Fully Guided Versus Half Guided Implant
NCT06542562 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Influence of Abutment Angulation on Implant Failure in Immediately Placed and Restored Implants in the Esthetic Zone Using Computer Aided Surgical Guides: RCT
NCT03243695 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
3D-Printed Implant Overdentures: Comparing Impression Techniques
NCT07208812 ·Status: RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
The Accuracy of Conventional Versus Digital Implant Impression Techniques
NCT04908618 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Complete Digital Workflow for Construction of Full Arch Implant Supported Screw Retained Restoration
NCT06067334 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Digital Versus Conventional Full-arch Implant Impression in Maxillary Screw- Retained Implant Prosthesis
NCT05709236 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Accuracy of Intraoral Photogrammetry vs Optical Scanners for Immediate Full-Arch Implant Loading
NCT07320729 ·Status: ACTIVE_NOT_RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Accuracy of Guided Implant Placement Using Artificial Intelligence Segmentation Versus Conventional Technique
NCT06967090 ·Status: NOT_YET_RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Accuracy of Fully Guided Dental Implant Placement by Experienced and Novice Clinicians Using Different Surgical Guides
NCT07112664 ·Status: ACTIVE_NOT_RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Implants Immediately Installed in Esthetic Area With Computer-guided Surgery
NCT03986164 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Effect of Face Scanning on Accuracy of Dental Implant Placement in Fixed Implant Supported Maxillary Prostheses
NCT06001515 ·Status: RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Comparative Accuracy of Conventional Scan Bodies, Intra-oral Photogrammetry, and Calibrated Scan Flags in Full-Arch Implant Scanning
NCT07200440 ·Status: NOT_YET_RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Conventional Impressions Versus Digital Impression Techniques for Implant Supported Screw Retained Prosthesis
NCT05912725 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA