MedTrace Logo

Comparative Accuracy of Conventional Scan Bodies, Intra-oral Photogrammetry, and Calibrated Scan Flags in Full-Arch Implant Scanning

NCT07200440 · Status: NOT_YET_RECRUITING · Phase: NA · Type: INTERVENTIONAL · Enrollment: 24

Last updated 2025-10-01

No results posted yet for this study

Summary

To assess and compare the accuracy of digital scans obtained using three different scanning protocols -conventional scan bodies, Intra-oral photogrammetry, and calibrated scan flags- on completely edentulous dental model with full-arch implants.

Conditions

  • Accuracy of Different Scanning Techniques

Interventions

PROCEDURE

Intervention 1

Digital scans using conventional scan bodies scanned with an intra-oral scanner.

PROCEDURE

Intervention 2

Digital scans using intra-oral photogrammetry scanned with an intra-oral scanner.

PROCEDURE

Intervention 3

Digital scans using calibrated scan flags scanned with an intra-oral scanner.

PROCEDURE

Control

Digital scans using conventional scan bodies scanned with a desktop scanner.

Sponsors & Collaborators

  • Cairo University

    lead OTHER

Study Design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Purpose
DIAGNOSTIC
Masking
SINGLE
Model
PARALLEL

Eligibility

Sex
ALL
Healthy Volunteers
No

Timeline & Regulatory

Start
2025-12-20
Primary Completion
2026-02-20
Completion
2026-03-20

More Related Trials

Read the full study record

This page highlights key information. For complete eligibility criteria, study locations, investigator contacts, and the full protocol, visit the original record on ClinicalTrials.gov.

View NCT07200440 on ClinicalTrials.gov