Passive Fit and Time Efficiency in All On-X Implants Protocols Using Photogrammetry, Splinted Scan Bodies, and Conventional Impression Technique
NCT07235072 · Status: NOT_YET_RECRUITING · Phase: NA · Type: INTERVENTIONAL · Enrollment: 14
Last updated 2025-11-24
Summary
compare the passive fit of three impression techniques: photogrammetry, intraoral digital scanning with splinted scan bodies, and the conventional open-tray impression technique, within the context of the All-on-X treatment concept. This comparison is expected to provide valuable clinical evidence to support clinicians in making informed decisions when considering the adoption of digital alternatives to conventional methods.
Conditions
- Passive Fit of Full-arch Implant Prostheses
Interventions
- DEVICE
-
Photogrammetry-Based Full-Arch Impression
Use of a photogrammetry system to capture the positions of All-on-X implants digitally without physical impression materials. The technique aims to achieve precise passive fit and reduce chairside working time. Measurements of passive fit discrepancy and total procedure time will be recorded
- DEVICE
-
Digital Impression Using Splinted Scan Bodies
Digital full-arch impression using splinted scan bodies connected with resin to enhance stability. An intraoral scanner captures the splinted assembly for framework fabrication. Passive fit and working time will be evaluated
- PROCEDURE
-
Conventional Open-Tray Implant Impression
Traditional full-arch open-tray impression using polyether or VPS material with splinted impression copings. This serves as the standard comparator for evaluating passive fit and procedure duration
Sponsors & Collaborators
-
October 6 University
lead OTHER
Study Design
- Allocation
- NON_RANDOMIZED
- Purpose
- DIAGNOSTIC
- Masking
- NONE
- Model
- CROSSOVER
Eligibility
- Min Age
- 45 Years
- Max Age
- 65 Years
- Sex
- ALL
- Healthy Volunteers
- No
Timeline & Regulatory
- Start
- 2026-03-01
- Primary Completion
- 2026-09-01
- Completion
- 2026-10-01
More Related Trials
-
Effect of Digital Versus Static Jaw Relation Record on Crestal Bone Changes Around Implants Supporting Maxillary Single Overdenture
NCT06965517 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Comparison of Abutments Engagement Configurations in Implant Supported Fixed Partial Dentures
NCT06715722 ·Status: RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Comparison of Synthetic Bone Substitute and a Bovine-derived Xenograft in Horizontal Bone Augmentation
NCT00901017 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Accuracy of Two Methods of Making Impressions for Complete-arch Implant Supported Fixed Prosthesis
NCT06343441 ·Status: NOT_YET_RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Comparative Clinical Study of Conventional vs Customized Healing Abutments in Dental Implantology
NCT07031232 ·Status: ACTIVE_NOT_RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Effect of Open Tray Versus Digital Impressions on the Passivity and Prosthetic Complications of Full Arch Screw-retained Prosthesis
NCT04848207 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Intaglio Surface of Full-arch Implant Supported Prosthesis
NCT06636097 ·Status: ENROLLING_BY_INVITATION
-
Digital vs Analog Impression in Cases of All-on-4 - Prosthesis
NCT04475913 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Assessing the Influence of Implant Scanning Techniques on the Accuracy of Maxillary Complete-Arch Digital Scans for Implant Overdentures: A Comparative Clinical Study
NCT07295899 ·Status: NOT_YET_RECRUITING
-
Comparing Scanning Accuracy of Full-Arch Maxillary Implants: Extraoral vs. Intraoral Techniques
NCT06669065 ·Status: ACTIVE_NOT_RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Digital Analysis of Occlusal Force Distribution in Single-Tooth Implant Restorations
NCT06862973 ·Status: COMPLETED
-
Ultrasonography and Cone-Beam Computed Tomography for Peri-implant Tissue Evaluation
NCT04488302 ·Status: COMPLETED
-
Immediate Implant in Posterior Mandible Region
NCT07027904 ·Status: NOT_YET_RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Comparing Dynamic Navigation to Static Navigation in the Implant Placement
NCT07291336 ·Status: RECRUITING ·Phase: PHASE4
-
The Accuracy of Static Navigation Systems and Robotic System in Partially Edentulous in Posterior Area
NCT06173921 ·Status: NOT_YET_RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Monitoring of Implant Diseases: Diagnosis and Monitoring with AMMP-8 Test Technology
NCT06761521 ·Status: ENROLLING_BY_INVITATION ·Phase: NA
-
Accuracy of Intraoral Photogrammetry vs Optical Scanners for Immediate Full-Arch Implant Loading
NCT07320729 ·Status: ACTIVE_NOT_RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
3D Integration of Facial , Intraoral Scanning and CBCT on Patient Satisfaction and Occlusion of Temporary, Permanent Implant Supported Prosthesis
NCT06846372 ·Status: ACTIVE_NOT_RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Accuracy of Dental Implant Placement Using Two Different CBCT-derived Templates
NCT02772172 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Digital vs Conventional Impression in Capturing the Emergence Profile Around Maxillary Anterior Implant-supported Crowns
NCT06425770 ·Status: RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Clinical Comparison of On1 Two-stage Abutment With One-stage Abutment on Different Implant Neck Design
NCT06022042 ·Status: ACTIVE_NOT_RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
A Comparison Between Protemp and Flowable Light Cure Composite Material for Creating Optimal Gingival Emergence Profile Around Implant
NCT07196293 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Fully Versus Partially Guided Implants Placement: Measurement of Accuracy of Implant Position and Passivity of Superstructures.
NCT07174791 ·Status: ACTIVE_NOT_RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
The Effect of Platform Switching on Single Implants in the Esthetic Zone, Following Flapless Surgery and Early-Loading Protocols
NCT02173236 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Dynamic Navigation-Assisted Dental Implant Placement
NCT03471208 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA