MedTrace Logo

Accuracy of Fully Guided Versus Half Guided Implant

NCT06542562 · Status: COMPLETED · Phase: NA · Type: INTERVENTIONAL · Enrollment: 16

Last updated 2025-08-01

No results posted yet for this study

Summary

six implants will be placed in edentulous maxilla to rehabilitate patients with implant prosthesis.The primary outcome measure will be the accuracy of implant placement, which will be evaluated using cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) scans

Conditions

  • Complete Edentulism

Interventions

PROCEDURE

guided implant placement

The key difference is that in Group 1, the guide is only used for the drilling sequence, while in Group 2 the guide is used for both the drilling and the actual implant placement.

Sponsors & Collaborators

  • October University for Modern Sciences and Arts

    lead OTHER

Study Design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
DOUBLE
Model
PARALLEL

Eligibility

Min Age
18 Years
Sex
ALL
Healthy Volunteers
No

Timeline & Regulatory

Start
2024-08-01
Primary Completion
2025-03-24
Completion
2025-04-24

Countries

  • Egypt

Study Locations

More Related Trials

Read the full study record

This page highlights key information. For complete eligibility criteria, study locations, investigator contacts, and the full protocol, visit the original record on ClinicalTrials.gov.

View NCT06542562 on ClinicalTrials.gov