Measuring Quality of Life of Versacryl Relined Dentures
NCT03321500 · Status: UNKNOWN · Phase: NA · Type: INTERVENTIONAL · Enrollment: 28
Last updated 2017-10-25
Summary
Resilient liners were introduced in the1950s and have been used since then as a gold standard material to increase the tolerance, retention and comfort of complete dentures. Due to drawbacks of conventional resilient liners, their longevity is questionable and they require replacement which is time consuming and costly for the dentist and patient respectively. Versacryl is a biocompatible intraoral thermo-elastic material. So versatile, it can be used to improve esthetics, retention and comfort for the patient. It softens with heat and when it is inserted to patient's mouth, it cools to body temperature providing desired rigidity. This process can be repeated many times to ensuring the comfort for the patient. Versacryl has a reported predictable long term performance, durable bonding to acrylic denture bases, high fatigue endurance, excellent wear characteristics and solvent resistance with almost no free monomer in the processed material .
The investigators' trial is done in order to improve the longevity and oral health related quality of life of soft liners in comparison to silicone-based soft liners.
Conditions
- Denture Liners
Interventions
- OTHER
-
Versacryl soft liner
Versacryl has been used to construct different parts of complete and partial dentures . It can be used as thermo-elastic liner which consistency can be controlled to tailor the reline to each individual case, by adding or subtracting drops of liquid B, as explained in the directions for use. The reline can be re-adapted repeatedly, even by the patient if necessary.
- OTHER
-
Silicone-based soft liner
gold standard for denture relining material
Sponsors & Collaborators
-
Cairo University
lead OTHER
Study Design
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Masking
- TRIPLE
- Model
- PARALLEL
Eligibility
- Min Age
- 55 Years
- Max Age
- 75 Years
- Sex
- ALL
- Healthy Volunteers
- No
Timeline & Regulatory
- Start
- 2018-01-01
- Primary Completion
- 2018-03-01
- Completion
- 2018-06-01
More Related Trials
-
Clinical Outcomes of Zirconia-reinforced Lithium Silicate Partial Coverage Crowns Compared to Lithium Disilicate Partial Coverage Crowns
NCT02861729 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Study of Wear in Composite Resin and Reinforced Acrylic Denture Teeth Used in Complete Denture Construction for Completely Edentulous Patients
NCT04839640 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Evaluation of Chewing Efficiency of Conventional Complete Denture in Comparison to Reinforced Poly Amide Denture
NCT03391063 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Compare the Difference in Occlusal Force Distribution and Denture Retention Using 2 Different Denture Base Materials in Implant Retained Overdenture
NCT07250503 ·Status: ACTIVE_NOT_RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Porcelain-fused-to-metal Versus Zirconia Implant- Supported in Mandibular Kennedy Class II
NCT06150768 ·Status: RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Abutment Analysis of Metallic Denture Frameworks in Mandibular Kenedy Class III Cases
NCT07215208 ·Status: NOT_YET_RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Evaluation of Three Hard Relining Materials in Complete Dentures
NCT02203279 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
To Evaluate the Complete Mandibular Dentures Produced Via 3D Printing in Comparison to Those Constructed From Metal-reinforced Acrylic Resin Regarding Their Retention
NCT07061860 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Comparison Between Injection Molded PEEK Framework and Cobalt Chromium Framework Removable Partial Dentures Regarding Biting Force
NCT03777423 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Retention, Chewing Efficiency and Masticatory Performance of Partial Dentures Opposing Implant Retained Prosthesis.
NCT05999760 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Retention of Metal Reinforced Polyamide Denture Base and Heat Cured Acrylic Resin Denture Base in Complete Mandibular Denture
NCT03385746 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Comparison Between Injection Molded PEEK Framework and Cobalt Chromium Framework in Removable Partial Denture Regarding Retention
NCT03777280 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Clinical Performance of Metal Ceramic Fixed Dental Prostheses Using Two Porcelain Veneering Systems: A Randomized Clinical Trial
NCT07029880 ·Status: RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
A Study Comparing Two Different Denture Base Materials in Implant Retained Overdentures
NCT07271641 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Comparative Study Between Injection Molding and Additive Manufacturing Complete Denture
NCT06520280 ·Status: ACTIVE_NOT_RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Clinical Evaluation of Ceramage Inlays Cemented With Beautilink Self-Adhesive Resin Cement Versus Rely X Resin Cement in Carious Posterior Teeth
NCT06833177 ·Status: ACTIVE_NOT_RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Assessment of Maxillary Acrylic Resin Complete Dentures Reinforced by Gold Plated Cr-Co Palatal Plate
NCT05466305 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Accuracy of 3D Printed Maxillary Complete Dentures
NCT03613896 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Comparison of Conventional Versus 3-D Printed Complete Denture Regarding Retention, Accuracy, Elctromyographic Activity and Patient Satisfaction.
NCT05834530 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Clinical Performance Evaluation of Two Different Dental Implants
NCT03845335 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Microbiological Study on Maxillary Complete Dentures of Two Different Materials
NCT02950623 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Polyetheretherketone vs Cobalt-chromium Telescopic Removable Partial Denture in Kennedy Class I Patients Regarding Oral Health Related Quality of Life
NCT03771248 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Accuracy of 3D Printed Complete Dentures Using Two Impression Techniques: RCT
NCT04982510 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Esthetic Outcome of 3D Printed Hybrid Ceramics as Final Restorations for Single Screw Retained Implant.
NCT07154602 ·Status: NOT_YET_RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Evaluation of Digital 3D Printed Temporary Removable Partial Denture.
NCT06106243 ·Status: RECRUITING ·Phase: NA