Evaluation of Microbial Growth on Bre-Flex Versus PEEK Denture Base in Bilateral Maxillary Bounded Partial Denture
NCT03491306 · Status: UNKNOWN · Phase: NA · Type: INTERVENTIONAL · Enrollment: 18
Last updated 2018-04-09
Summary
This study evaluate Microbial growth on Bre-Flex versus PEEK denture base in Bilateral Maxillary bounded partial denture , half of patients will receive a framework with breflex denture base and the other half will receive a framework with PEEK denture base then evaluate the Candida growth
Conditions
- Microbial Colonization
Interventions
- OTHER
-
PEEK
PEEK has been successfully used over the last years in the medical field, and orthopedics, specifically. which presents high bio compatibility, good mechanical properties, high temperature resistance, and chemical stability due to a 4 GPa modulus of elasticity, it is as elastic as bone and can reduce stresses transferred to the abutment teeth.Additional advantages of this polymer material are elimination of allergic reactions and metallic taste, high polishing qualities, low plaque affinity, and good wear resistance, it has only recently been used in dentistry.
- OTHER
-
Breflex
In the recent time thermoplastic materials become quite popular in clinical practice such as nylon and acetal resins. since the 1950, poly-amide resin (nylons) provide improved esthetics and reduction of rotational forces on the abutment teeth due to their low elastic modulus(3). The major disadvantage of a nylon removable denture is the inability for a reline procedure and the lack of occlusal rests as well as rigid frameworks, that could lead to occlusal instability and sinking, especially in Kennedy class I and II cases. On the other hand, acetal resins present adequate mechanical strength to form a frame-work more rigid than nylon with retentive clasps, connectors, and supportive elements; however, the acetal resin material lacks natural translucency and vitality.
Sponsors & Collaborators
-
Cairo University
lead OTHER
Principal Investigators
-
Nadia Abbas, PHD · Cairo Universty
Study Design
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Purpose
- OTHER
- Masking
- TRIPLE
- Model
- PARALLEL
Eligibility
- Min Age
- 35 Years
- Max Age
- 55 Years
- Sex
- ALL
- Healthy Volunteers
- Yes
Timeline & Regulatory
- Start
- 2018-06-01
- Primary Completion
- 2018-06-15
- Completion
- 2018-07-15
More Related Trials
-
Microbial Adhesion and Biofilm Formation on Denture Base Materials
NCT06395116 ·Status: ACTIVE_NOT_RECRUITING
-
Microbiological Study on Maxillary Complete Dentures of Two Different Materials
NCT02950623 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Effect of Zirconia Implant Supported PEKK Crowns Versus Lithium Disilicate Crowns on Esthetics
NCT03521024 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Single-retainer Lithium Di-silicate Versus Zirconia Resin Bonded Bridge for Replacement of an Anterior Missing Tooth.
NCT05861921 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Microbial Adhesion to Metallic Versus Non Metallic Surfaces of Bounded Removable Partial Denture
NCT03008317 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
A Study Comparing Two Different Denture Base Materials in Implant Retained Overdentures
NCT07271641 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Study of Wear in Composite Resin and Reinforced Acrylic Denture Teeth Used in Complete Denture Construction for Completely Edentulous Patients
NCT04839640 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Comparative Study Between Acrylic and Flexible Dentures
NCT03184883 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Retention of Metal Reinforced Polyamide Denture Base and Heat Cured Acrylic Resin Denture Base in Complete Mandibular Denture
NCT03385746 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Evaluation Of Marginal Bone Height Changes And Biting Force In Screw Retained Implant Prostheses Using Reinforced Resin Vs Monolithic Zirconium
NCT07007572 ·Status: RECRUITING ·Phase: PHASE2
-
Clinical and Radiographic Evaluation of The Effect of Acetal Resin Versus PEEK on Supporting Structure of Abutment Teeth
NCT06882161 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: PHASE3
-
Implant Stability Using Densah Bur Versus Expander
NCT03613415 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Comparison Between Injection Molded Polyetheretherketone (PEEK) Framework and Cobalt Chromium Framework Removable Partial Dentures Regarding Periodontal Health of Abutment Teeth
NCT03777345 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
(PEEK) Housing Verses Metallic Housing of Ball and Socket Attachment on Retention of Mandibular Overdenture
NCT02950662 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
PEEK Versus PFM Implant Supported Superstructure
NCT03578913 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Comparison Between Injection Molded PEEK Framework and Cobalt Chromium Framework Removable Partial Dentures Regarding Biting Force
NCT03777423 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Comparison of Conventional Versus 3-D Printed Complete Denture Regarding Retention, Accuracy, Elctromyographic Activity and Patient Satisfaction.
NCT05834530 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Patient Satisfaction and Microbial Changes in Complete Dentures.
NCT03043456 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Prosthetic Maintenance of Two Implant-Retained Overdentures Reinforced With PEKK Versus Co-Cr Frameworks
NCT06219811 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
To Evaluate the Complete Mandibular Dentures Produced Via 3D Printing in Comparison to Those Constructed From Metal-reinforced Acrylic Resin Regarding Their Retention
NCT07061860 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Retention, Chewing Efficiency and Masticatory Performance of Partial Dentures Opposing Implant Retained Prosthesis.
NCT05999760 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Abutment Analysis of Metallic Denture Frameworks in Mandibular Kenedy Class III Cases
NCT07215208 ·Status: NOT_YET_RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Compare the Difference in Occlusal Force Distribution and Denture Retention Using 2 Different Denture Base Materials in Implant Retained Overdenture
NCT07250503 ·Status: ACTIVE_NOT_RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Evaluation of PEEK Versus Titanium Bar Attachments With Implant Assisted Mandibular Complete Overdenture Fabricated by CAD/CAM Technology
NCT07262307 ·Status: ACTIVE_NOT_RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Clinical Evaluation of Indirect Tooth-Colored Onlays With Cervical Margin Relocation
NCT07157410 ·Status: RECRUITING ·Phase: NA