Efficacy and Safety of Flexible Ureteroscopy With Flexible Navigable Suction Ureteral Access Sheath Versus Mini-Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy With Vacuum-Assisted Access Sheath
NCT07763743 · Status: RECRUITING · Phase: NA · Type: INTERVENTIONAL · Enrollment: 72
Last updated 2026-08-13
Summary
Mini-percutaneous nephrolithotomy (mini-PCNL) and retrograde intrarenal surgery (RIRS) are both effective treatment modalities for renal calculi measuring up to 2.5 cm in pediatric patients, demonstrating similar efficacy and complication profiles.
Suction has emerged as a potentially transformative adjunct in both percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL) and RIRS. Recent studies evaluating various suction mechanisms during RIRS and mini-PCNL have demonstrated multiple benefits, including reduced operative time, higher stone-free rates (SFR), decreased intrarenal pressure (IRP) and temperature, as well as enhanced intraoperative visualization.
Both FANS-UAS in RIRS and VAAS in Mini-PCNL have shown promising outcomes in the pediatric population. Taken together, these findings suggest that suction-assisted technologies whether in RIRS or Mini-PCNL enhance both efficacy and safety in pediatric stone management.
Conditions
- Pediatric Renal Stones
Interventions
- PROCEDURE
-
Flexible Ureteroscopy
To compare the efficacy and safety of flexible ureteroscopy using a flexible and navigable suction ureteral access sheath (FANS-UAS) versus mini-percutaneous nephrolithotomy (Mini-PCNL) using a vacuum-assisted access sheath (VAAS) in the management of pediatric renal stones 1-2.5 cm
Sponsors & Collaborators
-
Ain Shams University
lead OTHER
Principal Investigators
-
Youssef Mahmoud kotb, Professor · Urology Department, Faculty of Medicine, Ain Shams University
Study Design
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Masking
- NONE
- Model
- PARALLEL
Eligibility
- Min Age
- 1 Year
- Max Age
- 14 Years
- Sex
- ALL
- Healthy Volunteers
- No
Timeline & Regulatory
- Start
- 2026-06-01
- Primary Completion
- 2027-06-01
- Completion
- 2027-06-10
Countries
- Egypt
Study Locations
More Related Trials
-
Vacuum-Assisted Mini-Percutaneous Versus Transurethral Cystolithotripsy in Pediatric Bladder Stones
NCT07614880 ·Status: RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Flexible Mini Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy Vs Retrograde Intra-renal Surgery
NCT06249100 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: PHASE2/PHASE3
-
Flexible Ureteroscopy Versus Mini-Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy for Treatment of Renal Stones
NCT03932370 ·Status: COMPLETED
-
Safety and Efficacy of Traditional Versus Flexible and Navigable Suction Sheath in Retrograde Intra-Renal Stone Surgery
NCT07286071 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Sheathless, Traditional, and Suction Access Sheath RIRS for Renal Stones ≤2 cm
NCT07289230 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Retrograde Intrarenal Surgery Versus Mini Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy
NCT07700251 ·Status: RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
PCNL Versus RIRS for Management of Stones in Solitary Kidney
NCT07730892 ·Status: ACTIVE_NOT_RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Retrograde Intrarenal Surgery for Renal Stones in Pediatrics: A Prospective Analysis of Feasibility and Outcomes.
NCT07089394 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
F-URS and Mini PCNL for Pediatric Urolithiasis
NCT06571617 ·Status: NOT_YET_RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Flexible Ureteroscopy With Tip-bendable Suction Ureteral Access Sheath Versus Mini-Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy for Treatment of 2-3cm Renal Stones
NCT06526390 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Bendable Suction Ureteral Access Sheath Versus Conventional Ureteral Access Sheath in Management of Renal Stones Using Flexible Ureteroscopy
NCT06862141 ·Status: RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Flexible Ureteroscopy Versus Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy As Primary Treatment in Renal Stones 2-3 Cm
NCT06892626 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Extracorporeal Shock Wave Lithotripsy for Treatment of Large Pediatric Renal Pelvic Stone Burden More Than 2 cm
NCT05293613 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Ultra Mini Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy VS Stented Extracorporeal Shock Wave Lithotripsy for Stone Management
NCT05697341 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Efficacy And Safety Of Antegrade Uretroscopic Lithotripsy Versus Retrograde Ureteroscopic Lithotripsy In The Treatment Of Upper Ureteric Stones Measuring > 10 mm In Maximum Dimension. A Randomized Comparative Study
NCT07362784 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
FANS-Assisted Mini-PCNL for Complex Renal Stones
NCT07332286 ·Status: ACTIVE_NOT_RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Ureteroscopy Combined With Negative Pressure Sheath Treatment of Kidney Stones
NCT06938113 ·Status: ENROLLING_BY_INVITATION
-
Flexible Nephroscopy-Assisted Single-Tract Versus Multi-Tract Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy for Complex Renal Stones
NCT07753733 ·Status: RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Ultra-Mini Versus Standard Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy For Management Of Renal Calculi. A Randomized Controlled Trial.
NCT04764071 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: PHASE3
-
RIRS With Flex Suction Sheath vs. PCNL for 2-3 cm Renal Stones
NCT07058402 ·Status: RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Flexible vs Semi-rigid URS
NCT07247617 ·Status: RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Comparison of Flexible & Navigable Suction Ureteral Access Sheath vs. Antegrade Suction in Retrograde Flexible Ureteroscopy for Lower Calyceal Stones
NCT06889051 ·Status: NOT_YET_RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Tip-flexible Semi-rigid Ureterorenoscope Versus Flexible Ureteroscopy in Renal Calculi
NCT02426931 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
A Prospective Observational Comparison of SMP and ESWL for the Treatment of Renal Stones ≥20 mm in Children (IAU-04)
NCT04317443 ·Status: UNKNOWN
-
Supine Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy
NCT04869969 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: PHASE2/PHASE3