RIRS With Flex Suction Sheath vs. PCNL for 2-3 cm Renal Stones
NCT07058402 · Status: RECRUITING · Phase: NA · Type: INTERVENTIONAL · Enrollment: 308
Last updated 2025-07-10
Summary
This is a multicenter, randomized controlled trial comparing retrograde intrarenal surgery (RIRS) using a tip-flexible suction access sheath with standard percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL) for the treatment of 2-3 cm unilateral renal stones. The aim is to evaluate the clinical efficacy and safety of the novel suction sheath-assisted RIRS compared to standard PCNL in terms of stone-free rate and postoperative complications. A total of 308 patients will be enrolled across four centers in China.
Conditions
- Nephrolithiasis
Interventions
- PROCEDURE
-
Retrograde Intrarenal Surgery (RIRS) with Tip-Flexible Suction Access Sheath
Participants undergo retrograde intrarenal surgery (RIRS) using a tip-flexible suction access sheath. The procedure involves the insertion of a flexible ureteroscope through the urethra and ureter into the kidney. A novel access sheath with tip-flexible and suction capabilities is used to facilitate stone fragmentation and removal. The goal is to improve stone clearance and reduce intrarenal pressure during the procedure.
- PROCEDURE
-
Standard Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy (PCNL)
Participants undergo standard percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL). The procedure involves creating a percutaneous tract into the renal collecting system under imaging guidance, followed by nephroscope insertion to fragment and extract 2-3 cm renal stones. This represents the current standard of care for large renal calculi.
Sponsors & Collaborators
-
Xinhua Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine
collaborator OTHER -
Zhejiang Provincial People's Hospital
collaborator OTHER -
Affiliated Hospital of Jiaxing University
collaborator OTHER -
Changhai Hospital
lead OTHER
Study Design
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Masking
- NONE
- Model
- PARALLEL
Eligibility
- Min Age
- 18 Years
- Max Age
- 80 Years
- Sex
- ALL
- Healthy Volunteers
- No
Timeline & Regulatory
- Start
- 2025-04-01
- Primary Completion
- 2026-04-30
- Completion
- 2026-06-30
Countries
- China
Study Locations
More Related Trials
-
Comparison of Surgical Outcomes Between MPCNL and RIRS
NCT02067221 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Intrarenal Pressure Monitoring Via Flexible and Navigable Suction Ureteral Access Sheath in Retrograde Intrarenal Surgery
NCT06729801 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Flexible Ureteroscopy With Tip-bendable Suction Ureteral Access Sheath Versus Mini-Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy for Treatment of 2-3cm Renal Stones
NCT06526390 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
FANS-Assisted Mini-PCNL for Complex Renal Stones
NCT07332286 ·Status: ACTIVE_NOT_RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Measurement of Resistance During UAS Insertion Procedure in RIRS
NCT03919227 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Safety and Efficacy of Traditional Versus Flexible and Navigable Suction Sheath in Retrograde Intra-Renal Stone Surgery
NCT07286071 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
RIRS Versus ESWL for the Treatment of Renal Stones
NCT02645058 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
RIRS for Treatment of Stones in Congenital Anomalous Kidneys
NCT05240170 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Comparison Between Two Methods for Renal Stone Treatment Mini Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy and Flexible Ureteroscopy With Suction Sheath
NCT07306819 ·Status: RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Mini-PNL, RIRS, and ESWL for Treatment of Medium-Sized, High-Density, Non-Lower Pole, Renal Stones
NCT04856722 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Analysis of the Effectiveness and Safety of RIRS Under Local Anesthesia and Its Influencing Factors
NCT06737497 ·Status: NOT_YET_RECRUITING
-
SMP vs RIRS for Symptomatic Lower Pole Renal Calculi of 10-20 mm Size: a Randomized Controlled Trial
NCT02519634 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Suction Mini-PCNL Versus Standard PCNL for the Management of 2-4cm Kidney Stones
NCT05088213 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Ureteroscopy Combined With Negative Pressure Sheath Treatment of Kidney Stones
NCT06938113 ·Status: ENROLLING_BY_INVITATION
-
Comparison of the Efficacy of Flexible Ureteroscope and Percutaneous Nephroscopic Surgery in the Treatment of 2-4cm Kidney Stones
NCT06507176 ·Status: TERMINATED ·Phase: NA
-
Comparison of Flexible & Navigable Suction Ureteral Access Sheath vs. Antegrade Suction in Retrograde Flexible Ureteroscopy for Lower Calyceal Stones
NCT06889051 ·Status: NOT_YET_RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
The 18F Peel-way Sheath Versus the 18F Access Sheath With a Suction-evacuation Function MPCNL for the Management of 2-5cm Size Kidney Stones
NCT03206515 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Flexible Mini Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy Vs Retrograde Intra-renal Surgery
NCT06249100 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: PHASE2/PHASE3
-
Comparison Of External Physical Vibration Lithecbole(EPVL) In Different Time After Retrograde Intrarenal Surgery(RIRS)
NCT02890225 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
External Physical Vibration Lithecbole(EPVL) Versus Traditional Row of Stone After Retrograde Intrarenal Surgery(RIRS)
NCT02645708 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Comparing Efficiency and Stone-Free Rates Mini PCNL vs Flex URS
NCT07072598 ·Status: RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Tip-flexible Semi-rigid Ureterorenoscope Versus Flexible Ureteroscopy in Renal Calculi
NCT02426931 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Are the Stone Density and Location Useful Parameters for Small Kidney Stones?
NCT03503539 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
7.5F Versus 9.2F Flexible Ureteroscopy for the Treatment of 1-2cm Renal Calculi on Postoperative Infection
NCT05231577 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Investigate the Renal Movement by Single Lung Ventilation in Patients Administered RIRS for Kidney Stones.
NCT03060837 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA