Efficacy And Safety Of Antegrade Uretroscopic Lithotripsy Versus Retrograde Ureteroscopic Lithotripsy In The Treatment Of Upper Ureteric Stones Measuring > 10 mm In Maximum Dimension. A Randomized Comparative Study

NCT07362784 · Status: COMPLETED · Phase: NA · Type: INTERVENTIONAL · Enrollment: 100

Last updated 2026-01-23

No results posted yet for this study

Summary

This study aims to assess the efficacy and safety of antegrade flexible ureteroscopic lithotripsy in treating upper ureteric stones \>10 mm in maximum dimension and impacted upper ureteric stones irrespective of size in comparison to retrograde ureteroscopic lithotripsy and evaluate feasibility, adverse events, hospital stay and cost benefit of both techniques

Conditions

  • Upper Ureteric Stones

Interventions

PROCEDURE

antegrade flexible ureteroscopy for group A

The antegrade approach with this stone size will further prove the superior stone free rate compared with the retrograde approach, widen the indication for the antegrade approach and prove the more favorable perioperative safety profile

PROCEDURE

retrograde flexible ureteroscopy For group B

he antegrade approach with this stone size will further prove the superior stone free rate compared with the retrograde approach, widen the indication for the antegrade approach and prove the more favorable perioperative safety profile

Sponsors & Collaborators

  • Ain Shams University

    lead OTHER

Study Design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE
Model
PARALLEL

Eligibility

Min Age
18 Years
Sex
ALL
Healthy Volunteers
No

Timeline & Regulatory

Start
2022-03-15
Primary Completion
2025-08-10
Completion
2025-09-14

Countries

  • Egypt

Study Locations

More Related Trials

Read the full study record

This page highlights key information. For complete eligibility criteria, study locations, investigator contacts, and the full protocol, visit the original record on ClinicalTrials.gov.

View NCT07362784 on ClinicalTrials.gov