Ultra Mini Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy VS Stented Extracorporeal Shock Wave Lithotripsy for Stone Management
NCT05697341 · Status: COMPLETED · Phase: NA · Type: INTERVENTIONAL · Enrollment: 90
Last updated 2023-01-25
Summary
Nephrolithiasis is the third most common disease of the urinary tract. As minimally invasive technologies develop, shock wave lithotripsy (SWL), retrograde intrarenal surgery (RIRS), and percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL) are different surgeries to treat renal stones.
Aim of the Study is to compare results, safety and outcome of Ultra mini PCNL versus stented extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy (SWL) for the management of renal calculi from 10 - 20 mm. Patients were randomized to either Ultra-Mini-Percutaneous nephrolithotomy group or stented SWL group via the closed envelope method. Patient data was collected preoperatively, immediately postoperatively and 2 and 4 weeks postoperatively to assess operative time, hospital stay, complications regarding fever, hematuria and need for blood transfusion, residual stones and need for retreatment.
Conditions
- Renal Stone
Interventions
- PROCEDURE
-
Ultra-Mini-PCNL
treatment to extract or disintegrate renal stones
- PROCEDURE
-
Stented SWL
treatment to disintegrate renal stones in the presence of a JJ
Sponsors & Collaborators
-
Ain Shams University
lead OTHER
Principal Investigators
-
Ahmed Radwan, MD · Assisstant Professof of Urology, Faculty of medicine, Ain Shams University
Study Design
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Masking
- NONE
- Model
- PARALLEL
Eligibility
- Min Age
- 18 Years
- Max Age
- 60 Years
- Sex
- ALL
- Healthy Volunteers
- No
Timeline & Regulatory
- Start
- 2021-03-01
- Primary Completion
- 2022-03-01
- Completion
- 2022-06-01
Countries
- Egypt
Study Locations
More Related Trials
-
Ultraslow Full-power SWL Versus Slow Power-ramping SWL in Stones With High Attenuation Value
NCT03763539 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Mini-PNL, RIRS, and ESWL for Treatment of Medium-Sized, High-Density, Non-Lower Pole, Renal Stones
NCT04856722 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Flexible Ureteroscopy Versus Extracorporeal Shock Wave Lithotripsy
NCT07193940 ·Status: NOT_YET_RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Mini- Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy Versus Standard Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy in the Treatment of Renal Stones.
NCT04153461 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Ultraslow SWL Versus Slow SWL for Renal Stones With High Attenuation Value
NCT03795532 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Shock Wave Lithotripsy Versus Visual Cystolitholapaxy in The Management of Patients Presenting With Calcular Acute Urinary Retention: A Randomized Controlled Trial.
NCT02594631 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: PHASE4
-
ESWL vs URS in Management of Upper Third Ureteric Calculi
NCT03559738 ·Status: COMPLETED
-
(SWL) Versus (ODT) Versus Combined SWL And ODT For Radiolucent Stone
NCT03388060 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
The Alternating Bidirectional Versus The Standard Approach During Shock Wave Lithotripsy For Renal And Upper Lumbar Ureteric Stones
NCT03243682 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
to Study the Role of Retrograde Intrarenal Surgery in Management of Renal Stones
NCT05648877 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Ultraslow SWL Versus Slow SWL for Ureteric Stones With High Attenuation Value
NCT03795545 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Laser Versus Ultrasonic Lithotripsy in Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy for Staghorn Stones
NCT01922414 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Comparison Between Two Methods for Renal Stone Treatment Mini Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy and Flexible Ureteroscopy With Suction Sheath
NCT07306819 ·Status: RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Flexible Ureteroscopy Versus Mini-Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy for Treatment of Renal Stones
NCT03932370 ·Status: COMPLETED
-
The Efficacy of Oral Dissolution Therapy (ODT), Extracorporeal Shock Wave Lithotripsy (ESWL), and Combined ESWL and ODT as Non-Invasive Modalities for Treating Small and Medium-Sized Radiolucent Renal Stones
NCT06814834 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Management of Lower Pole Renal Hard Stones ≤2 cm
NCT06120257 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Endoscopic Combined Intrarenal Surgery Versus Multi-Tract Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy for Complex Renal Stones:
NCT05460559 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Shock Wave Lithotripsy Using Fluoroscopic Versus Ultrasonic Localization
NCT05413603 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Clinical Efficacy of Mini-PCNLversus RIRS for the Management of Upper Urinary Tract Calculus (1-2.5 cm)
NCT06031103 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Can Shear Wave Elastography Predict the Success of ESWL: a Prospective Study
NCT05995652 ·Status: COMPLETED
-
Retrograde Saline Irrigation During Supine Mini Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy
NCT06879990 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Ureteral Stenting After Retrograde Intrarenal Surgery for Renal Stones
NCT05738304 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Shockwave Lithotripsy (SWL) Versus SWL and Oral Dissolution Therapy (ODT) For Paediatrics Radiolucent Renal Stone
NCT05896345 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Bendable Suction Ureteral Access Sheath Versus Conventional Ureteral Access Sheath in Management of Renal Stones Using Flexible Ureteroscopy
NCT06862141 ·Status: RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Laser Lithotripsy for Ureteral Stones
NCT06465784 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: PHASE4