Safety and Efficacy of Traditional Versus Flexible and Navigable Suction Sheath in Retrograde Intra-Renal Stone Surgery
NCT07286071 · Status: COMPLETED · Phase: NA · Type: INTERVENTIONAL · Enrollment: 140
Last updated 2026-02-11
Summary
This study compares two techniques used during RIRS for the treatment of kidney stones measuring up to 20 mm. During RIRS, surgeons often use a device called a UAS to help pass instruments into the urinary system and to assist with the removal of stone fragments. A traditional UAS allows irrigation fluid and small fragments to flow out passively. A newer type, known as a suction UAS, applies controlled negative pressure to help clear stone fragments more effectively and may reduce pressure inside the kidney during the procedure.
The purpose of this study is to determine whether the suction UAS offers better clinical outcomes than the traditional UAS. The main outcomes assessed include the SFR, the duration of surgery, and complications after the procedure such as fever, sepsis, urinary infection, calyceal injury, or ureteral injury.
In this randomized study, adult patients undergoing RIRS for a single renal stone were assigned to either the suction UAS or the traditional UAS. All patients were followed after surgery to assess stone clearance and any complications. The results of this study aim to provide evidence on whether suction UAS improves safety or effectiveness in RIRS compared with the traditional approach.
Conditions
- Urolithiasis
- Kidney Calculi
- Nephrolithiasis
Interventions
- PROCEDURE
-
Retrograde intrarenal surgery using a ureteral access sheath with suction
This intervention involves performing retrograde intrarenal surgery using a ureteral access sheath equipped with a suction mechanism that applies controlled negative pressure to help remove stone fragments and manage pressure inside the kidney during the procedure.
- PROCEDURE
-
Retrograde intrarenal surgery using a traditional ureteral access sheath
This intervention involves performing retrograde intrarenal surgery using a conventional ureteral access sheath without suction, relying on irrigation flow and basket retrieval for stone fragment removal.
Sponsors & Collaborators
-
Ain Shams University
lead OTHER
Study Design
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Masking
- NONE
- Model
- PARALLEL
Eligibility
- Min Age
- 18 Years
- Sex
- ALL
- Healthy Volunteers
- No
Timeline & Regulatory
- Start
- 2025-06-01
- Primary Completion
- 2025-12-01
- Completion
- 2025-12-01
Countries
- Egypt
Study Locations
More Related Trials
-
Bendable Suction Ureteral Access Sheath Versus Conventional Ureteral Access Sheath in Management of Renal Stones Using Flexible Ureteroscopy
NCT06862141 ·Status: RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Comparison of Flexible & Navigable Suction Ureteral Access Sheath vs. Antegrade Suction in Retrograde Flexible Ureteroscopy for Lower Calyceal Stones
NCT06889051 ·Status: NOT_YET_RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Comparison of Vacuum-Assisted and Conventional Ureteral Access Sheath in Retrograde Intrarenal Surgery
NCT06684756 ·Status: ACTIVE_NOT_RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Retrograde Intrarenal Surgery (RIRS) With Suction
NCT06786715 ·Status: ACTIVE_NOT_RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Measurement of Resistance During UAS Insertion Procedure in RIRS
NCT03919227 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
A Comparative Study Between the Usage of Flexible and Navigable Suction Ureteral Access Sheath Versus Traditional Access Sheath in Retrograde Intrarenal Surgeries
NCT07076589 ·Status: RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Effect of Ureteral Access Sheath Use on Postoperative Pain Level in Patients Undergoing RIRS
NCT02501525 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Flexible Ureteroscopy With Tip-bendable Suction Ureteral Access Sheath Versus Mini-Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy for Treatment of 2-3cm Renal Stones
NCT06526390 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Ureteroscopy Combined With Negative Pressure Sheath Treatment of Kidney Stones
NCT06938113 ·Status: ENROLLING_BY_INVITATION
-
Retrograde Saline Irrigation During Supine Mini Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy
NCT06879990 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Flexible vs Semi-rigid URS
NCT07247617 ·Status: RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Flexible Mini Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy Vs Retrograde Intra-renal Surgery
NCT06249100 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: PHASE2/PHASE3
-
Flexible Ureteroscopy With and Without Ureteral Access Sheath in Treatment of Large Renal Stones
NCT06122129 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
RIRS With Tip Flexible Pressure-controlling Ureteral Access Sheath Versus Mini PCNLfor Kidney Stones
NCT06209931 ·Status: RECRUITING
-
ClearPetra™ Vacuum-assisted Ureteral Access Sheath vs Traditional Approach
NCT06547632 ·Status: TERMINATED ·Phase: NA
-
RIRS Versus ESWL for the Treatment of Renal Stones
NCT02645058 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
ESWL Vs Flexible Uretroscopy in Management of Upper Ureteric Stones a Prospective Randomized Study
NCT06722703 ·Status: NOT_YET_RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Suction Mini-PCNL Versus Standard PCNL for the Management of 2-4cm Kidney Stones
NCT05088213 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
The Effect of Different Body Positions and Channel Sheaths on RIRS
NCT06438497 ·Status: RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Management of Medium Sized Renal Stones
NCT06720311 ·Status: NOT_YET_RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Intrarenal Pressure Monitoring Via Flexible and Navigable Suction Ureteral Access Sheath in Retrograde Intrarenal Surgery
NCT06729801 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Safety and Efficacy of Fluoroscopy-free Technique During Retrograde Intrarenal Surgery for Renal Stones
NCT05269108 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Outcomes of Using FANS With FURS in TTT of Lower Calyceal Stones.
NCT07238803 ·Status: RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Laser Lithotripsy for Ureteral Stones
NCT06465784 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: PHASE4
-
Evaluation of Retrograde Intra Renal Surgery in the T-tilted Position
NCT06860113 ·Status: RECRUITING ·Phase: NA