PCNL Versus RIRS for Management of Stones in Solitary Kidney
NCT07730892 · Status: ACTIVE_NOT_RECRUITING · Phase: NA · Type: INTERVENTIONAL · Enrollment: 83
Last updated 2026-07-28
Summary
Few studies compared PCNL and RIRS for stones in solitary kidney. Current guidelines do not provide clear recommendations concerning the management of renal stones in patients with solitary kidney. The study aims to compare the safety and efficacy of the use of percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL) and flexible ureteroscopy in the treatment of renal stones \_ ≤ 3 cm in largest diameter through a prospective non randomized study in the period between August 2024 and August 2026. Stone-free rate will be assessed by NCCT done at 1st day postoperative and after 3 months. For Evaluation of kidney function postoperatively, creatinine clearance will be done after 1month and renal isotope scan will be done after 3 months. In addition, the results will be compared to the data of the patients with solitary kidney and renal stones who were retrospectively treated by PCNL or RIRS in the period between 2002 and 2024. The cases should fulfil the same inclusion criteria of the prospective study.
Conditions
- Renal Stones
Interventions
- PROCEDURE
-
retrograde intra renal surgery (RIRS)
standard retrograde intrarenal surgery (RIRS) for management of stones in solitary kidney
- PROCEDURE
-
percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL)
standard percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL) for management of stones in solitary kidney
Sponsors & Collaborators
-
Mansoura University
lead OTHER
Principal Investigators
-
Ahmed M. Shoma, Professor of urology · Urology and Nephrology Center , Mansoura university , Egypt
Study Design
- Allocation
- NON_RANDOMIZED
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Masking
- NONE
- Model
- PARALLEL
Eligibility
- Min Age
- 18 Years
- Sex
- ALL
- Healthy Volunteers
- No
Timeline & Regulatory
- Start
- 2024-11-23
- Primary Completion
- 2026-08-01
- Completion
- 2026-10-01
Countries
- Egypt
Study Locations
More Related Trials
-
Sheathless, Traditional, and Suction Access Sheath RIRS for Renal Stones ≤2 cm
NCT07289230 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Clinical Efficacy of Mini-PCNLversus RIRS for the Management of Upper Urinary Tract Calculus (1-2.5 cm)
NCT06031103 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Endoscopic Combined Intrarenal Surgery Versus Multi-Tract Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy for Complex Renal Stones:
NCT05460559 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
RIRS With Tip Flexible Pressure-controlling Ureteral Access Sheath Versus Mini PCNLfor Kidney Stones
NCT06209931 ·Status: RECRUITING
-
Ultra Mini Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy VS Stented Extracorporeal Shock Wave Lithotripsy for Stone Management
NCT05697341 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Comparison Between Two Methods for Renal Stone Treatment Mini Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy and Flexible Ureteroscopy With Suction Sheath
NCT07306819 ·Status: RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Postoperative Outcomes of PCNL vs RIRS in Obese Patients With Pelvic 1.5:3 cm Renal Stones
NCT06175910 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Retrograde Intrarenal Surgery (RIRS) With High-Power Laser and Flexible, Navigable Suction Access Sheath (FANS) vs Mini-Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy (miniPCNL) for 2-3 cm Renal Stones
NCT07349992 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Endoscopic Guided PCNL Versus Standard PCNL
NCT04825353 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
F-URS and Mini PCNL for Pediatric Urolithiasis
NCT06571617 ·Status: NOT_YET_RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
RIRS Versus ESWL for the Treatment of Renal Stones
NCT02645058 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Retrograde Ureteral Catheterization Is Not Essential in Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy: A Randomized Controlled Trial
NCT06750913 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Determinants of Health-related Quality of Life for Patients After Renal Lithotripsy: PNL Versus RIRS
NCT05851339 ·Status: UNKNOWN
-
Comparison of Surgical Outcomes Between MPCNL and RIRS
NCT02067221 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
FANS-Assisted Mini-PCNL for Complex Renal Stones
NCT07332286 ·Status: ACTIVE_NOT_RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Flexible Ureteroscopy Versus Mini-Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy for Treatment of Renal Stones
NCT03932370 ·Status: COMPLETED
-
Flexible urétéroscopy Versus Extracorporeal Shockwave Lithotripsy in Renal Calculi
NCT01604304 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
(SWL) Versus (ODT) Versus Combined SWL And ODT For Radiolucent Stone
NCT03388060 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy Versus Extracorporeal Shock Wave Lithotripsy
NCT00873054 ·Status: COMPLETED
-
The Effect of Three Endourological Procedures for the Management of Renal Calculi Regarding Acute Kidney Injury
NCT03112499 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Efficacy and Safety of Flexible Ureteroscopy Versus Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy in Management of Staghorn Stones
NCT07322471 ·Status: NOT_YET_RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Retrograde Intrarenal Surgery for Renal Stones in Pediatrics: A Prospective Analysis of Feasibility and Outcomes.
NCT07089394 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Comparison of the Efficacy of Flexible Ureteroscope and Percutaneous Nephroscopic Surgery in the Treatment of 2-4cm Kidney Stones
NCT06507176 ·Status: TERMINATED ·Phase: NA
-
Comparing Pneumatic Versus Ultra-sonic Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy in Large Kidney Stones
NCT02751281 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: PHASE2
-
Nebulized Glubran 2-Assisted Tubeless PCNL Versus Conventional PCNL
NCT07749807 ·Status: NOT_YET_RECRUITING ·Phase: NA