A Prospective Observational Comparison of SMP and ESWL for the Treatment of Renal Stones ≥20 mm in Children (IAU-04)
NCT04317443 · Status: UNKNOWN · Type: OBSERVATIONAL · Enrollment: 250
Last updated 2020-04-30
Summary
ESWL and PNL are the two treatment modalities for kidney stones greater than 20 mm in the pediatric population. ESWL is non-invasive, does not require anesthesia and inexpensive, but its success rate may be lower, and require multiple treatment sessions. On the contrary, PNL has a higher success rate, does not require multiple sessions but is an invasive method. Compared to standard PNL, miniaturized PNL systems have been shown to decrease complications with comparable success rates. SMP is a unique miniaturized PNL system with integrated active irrigation and suction systems. The current literature lacks studies comparing SMP and ESWL prospectively in the pediatric population. In this study, the effectiveness, reliability, and reusability of ESWL and SMP will be compared.
Conditions
- Kidney Stone
Interventions
- PROCEDURE
-
Super-mini percutaneous nephrolithotomy (SMP)
SMP will be performed under general anesthesia in prone/supine position. Renal puncture will be performed under ultrasound/fluoroscopy guidance based on the preference of the participating surgeon. Tracts will be dilated to 14 Fr. Stone fragmentation will be performed with holmium laser and fragments will be extracted with the active suction system. For the exit strategy, placement of a nephrostomy tube or JJ stent will be decided by the participating surgeon.
- PROCEDURE
-
Extracorporeal Shock Wave Lithotripsy (ESWL)
ESWL will be performed under sedation/analgesia, shock wave lithotripsy parameters will be determined based on the device and the settings of local center. For patients requiring multiple sessions, maximum 3 (or more) sessions will be allowed. Ureteral stenting prior to ESWL will be performed based on the decision of the participating center.
Sponsors & Collaborators
-
The International Alliance of Urolithiasis
lead NETWORK
Eligibility
- Max Age
- 14 Years
- Sex
- ALL
- Healthy Volunteers
- Yes
Timeline & Regulatory
- Start
- 2020-05-01
- Primary Completion
- 2021-05-01
- Completion
- 2021-09-01
More Related Trials
-
Flexible urétéroscopy Versus Extracorporeal Shockwave Lithotripsy in Renal Calculi
NCT01604304 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Mini- Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy Versus Extracorporeal Shock Wave Lithotripsy for High Density Renal Stones
NCT04346134 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Optical Motion Capture-Assisted Ultrasound for Pediatric ESWL
NCT07299032 ·Status: NOT_YET_RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Extracorporeal Shockwave Lithotripsy, Electroconductive and Electrohydraulic Types
NCT06144372 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Shockwave Lithotripsy (SWL) Versus SWL and Oral Dissolution Therapy (ODT) For Paediatrics Radiolucent Renal Stone
NCT05896345 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Extracorporal Shockwave Lithotripsy Versus Retrograde Intrarenal Surgery for the Treatment of Kidney Stones
NCT01514032 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
The 18F Peel-way Sheath Versus the 18F Access Sheath With a Suction-evacuation Function MPCNL for the Management of 2-5cm Size Kidney Stones
NCT03206515 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
The Efficacy of Oral Dissolution Therapy (ODT), Extracorporeal Shock Wave Lithotripsy (ESWL), and Combined ESWL and ODT as Non-Invasive Modalities for Treating Small and Medium-Sized Radiolucent Renal Stones
NCT06814834 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Shock Wave Lithotripsy Using Fluoroscopic Versus Ultrasonic Localization
NCT05413603 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
ESWL vs URS in Management of Upper Third Ureteric Calculi
NCT03559738 ·Status: COMPLETED
-
ESWL Vs Flexible Uretroscopy in Management of Upper Ureteric Stones a Prospective Randomized Study
NCT06722703 ·Status: NOT_YET_RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Indications and Outcomes in Kidney-ureteral Pediatric Lithiasis: Experience of Parma
NCT04605315 ·Status: COMPLETED
-
Ho:YAG Laser Versus Thulium Laser for the Management of 2-4cm Kidney Stones During SMP
NCT05190536 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Comparison of the Efficacy of Flexible Ureteroscope and Percutaneous Nephroscopic Surgery in the Treatment of 2-4cm Kidney Stones
NCT06507176 ·Status: TERMINATED ·Phase: NA
-
Primary Versus Deferred Ureteroscopy for Calculus Anuria in Children
NCT04980079 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Standard-PCNL vs Mini-PCNL vs Super-mini PCNL for the Treatment of ≥2 cm Renal Stone
NCT03771365 ·Status: UNKNOWN
-
Ureteral Stents Versus Percutaneous Nephrostomy for Initial Urinary Drainage
NCT02055430 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Ultra-Mini Versus Standard Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy For Management Of Renal Calculi. A Randomized Controlled Trial.
NCT04764071 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: PHASE3
-
A Study to Investigate the Effect of Extracorporeal Shockwave Lithotripsy on Hypertension
NCT03714477 ·Status: WITHDRAWN ·Phase: NA
-
The Success of Pediatric Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy
NCT04299204 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Comparison Between Supine Mini-PCNL and Flexible Ureteroscopy (FURS) for Dense Lower Calyceal Stones (1-2 cm) in School-Age Pediatric Patients
NCT07345234 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Ultra Mini Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy VS Stented Extracorporeal Shock Wave Lithotripsy for Stone Management
NCT05697341 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Tubeless vs Tube PCNL in Pediatric Nephrolithiasis: A Randomized Controlled Trial.
NCT07183930 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Ultrasonic vs. Fluoroscopic Guided PNL in Pediatric Renal Stones
NCT03250559 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Management of Medium Sized Renal Stones
NCT06720311 ·Status: NOT_YET_RECRUITING ·Phase: NA