Comparison of ESWL and Mini-PCNL for High-Density Renal Stones in Children
NCT07360041 · Status: COMPLETED · Phase: NA · Type: INTERVENTIONAL · Enrollment: 100
Last updated 2026-01-22
Summary
Pediatric nephrolithiasis is an increasing health problem, with rising prevalence particularly in certain geographic regions. Management options for pediatric renal stones include extracorporeal shockwave lithotripsy (SWL), percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PNL), and retrograde intrarenal surgery. According to the EAU/ESPU guidelines, SWL is recommended as a first-line treatment for most renal stones; however, its success is significantly influenced by stone size, location, and density. High-density renal stones (≥1000 Hounsfield Units) are associated with lower stone-free rates after SWL and higher retreatment rates.
Miniaturized percutaneous nephrolithotomy (mini-PNL) has emerged as an effective alternative, offering high stone-free rates with reduced morbidity compared to standard PNL due to the use of smaller access sheaths. While adult studies have demonstrated superior outcomes of mini-PNL over SWL for high-density renal stones, there is a lack of comparative data in the pediatric population.
This prospective randomized controlled study aims to compare the efficacy and safety of mini-PNL versus SWL in children aged 2 to 12 years with single, non-lower pole, high-density (≥1000 HU), medium-sized (10-20 mm) renal stones. Eligible patients will be randomized into two equal groups to undergo either mini-PNL or SWL under general anesthesia.
The primary outcome is the stone-free rate, defined as no residual stone or residual fragments ≤4 mm on non-contrast computed tomography performed three months after the procedure. Secondary outcomes include operative and fluoroscopy times, hemoglobin drop, length of hospital stay, retreatment and ancillary procedure rates, and postoperative complications graded according to the Clavien-Dindo classification.
The study will be conducted at a single tertiary referral center. All participants' parents or legal guardians will provide informed consent in accordance with Good Clinical Practice guidelines and the Declaration of Helsinki. This study aims to provide evidence to guide optimal management of pediatric patients with high-density renal stones.
Conditions
- Renal Stones
- Calculus
- Pediatric
- Endoscopy
Interventions
- PROCEDURE
-
Miniaturized Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy (mini-PNL)
Mini-PNL: All procedures will be done in the prone position. The target calyx will be punctured using fluoroscopic guidance with an 18-GA sheathed needle, and tract dilatation will be achieved using Amplantz dilators up to 16-18 Fr according to patient age. The holmium: YAG laser will be used to perform the stone fragmentation. Standard 12-Fr rigid nephroscope will be used for stone retrieval and fragmentation. A clamped nephrostomy tube will be placed routinely to reduce the bleeding for 24 h in all cases. The nephrostomy tube and the ureteral catheter will be removed on first and second postoperative days if there will be no complications.
- PROCEDURE
-
Shock Wave Lithotripsy (SWL)
The lithotripsy will be performed by an electromagnetic shockwave lithotripter (Dornier Compact Sigma). The lung and genitourinary fields will be shielded for all patients. Fluoroscopy will be used to localize the stone and to monitor fragmentation.The dispensed shockwave will begin at 14 kV and escalates to its maximum power level of 20 kV. The maximum number of shocks given per session will be between 1000 and 2500 depending on patient age (1000 waves per session for children younger than 5 years and 2500 waves per session for older children, with a frequency of 70 shocks/minute). The SWL session will be stopped when no visible stone is detected, or when tiny fragments are the only visible stone remnants, or when the desired number of shocks has been given.
Sponsors & Collaborators
-
Ain Shams University
lead OTHER
Study Design
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Masking
- TRIPLE
- Model
- PARALLEL
Eligibility
- Min Age
- 2 Years
- Max Age
- 12 Years
- Sex
- ALL
- Healthy Volunteers
- No
Timeline & Regulatory
- Start
- 2023-05-28
- Primary Completion
- 2025-05-20
- Completion
- 2025-09-09
Countries
- Egypt
Study Locations
More Related Trials
-
Shock Wave Lithotripsy Using Fluoroscopic Versus Ultrasonic Localization
NCT05413603 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Ultra-Mini Versus Standard Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy For Management Of Renal Calculi. A Randomized Controlled Trial.
NCT04764071 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: PHASE3
-
Comparison Between Supine Mini-PCNL and Flexible Ureteroscopy (FURS) for Dense Lower Calyceal Stones (1-2 cm) in School-Age Pediatric Patients
NCT07345234 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
A Prospective Observational Comparison of SMP and ESWL for the Treatment of Renal Stones ≥20 mm in Children (IAU-04)
NCT04317443 ·Status: UNKNOWN
-
Treatment of Upper Ureteric Stones
NCT02469766 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: PHASE4
-
The Efficacy and Safety of Medical Expulsive Therapy After Extracorporeal Shock Wave Lithotripsy (ESWL) in Pediatric Urolithiasis
NCT05759767 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Mini- Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy Versus Standard Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy in the Treatment of Renal Stones.
NCT04153461 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Stepwise Shock Wave Lithotripsy in Pediatric Urolithiasis
NCT01807260 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Shock Wave Lithotripsy Versus Visual Cystolitholapaxy in The Management of Patients Presenting With Calcular Acute Urinary Retention: A Randomized Controlled Trial.
NCT02594631 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: PHASE4
-
Retrograde Intrarenal Surgery for Renal Stones in Pediatrics: A Prospective Analysis of Feasibility and Outcomes.
NCT07089394 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
(SWL) Versus (ODT) Versus Combined SWL And ODT For Radiolucent Stone
NCT03388060 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Primary Versus Deferred Ureteroscopy for Calculus Anuria in Children
NCT04980079 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Mini-PNL, RIRS, and ESWL for Treatment of Medium-Sized, High-Density, Non-Lower Pole, Renal Stones
NCT04856722 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Percutaneous Versus Transurethral Cystolithotripsy For The Management Of Bladder Calculi In The Pre-school Boys
NCT06970587 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Ureteral Stents Versus Percutaneous Nephrostomy for Initial Urinary Drainage
NCT02055430 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Comparison Between Two Methods for Renal Stone Treatment Mini Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy and Flexible Ureteroscopy With Suction Sheath
NCT07306819 ·Status: RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Flexible Ureteroscopy Versus Extracorporeal Shock Wave Lithotripsy
NCT07193940 ·Status: NOT_YET_RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Flexible Mini Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy Vs Retrograde Intra-renal Surgery
NCT06249100 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: PHASE2/PHASE3
-
F-URS and Mini PCNL for Pediatric Urolithiasis
NCT06571617 ·Status: NOT_YET_RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
The Efficacy of Oral Dissolution Therapy (ODT), Extracorporeal Shock Wave Lithotripsy (ESWL), and Combined ESWL and ODT as Non-Invasive Modalities for Treating Small and Medium-Sized Radiolucent Renal Stones
NCT06814834 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
ESWL vs URS in Management of Upper Third Ureteric Calculi
NCT03559738 ·Status: COMPLETED
-
The Alternating Bidirectional Versus The Standard Approach During Shock Wave Lithotripsy For Renal And Upper Lumbar Ureteric Stones
NCT03243682 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Flexible Ureteroscopy Versus Mini-Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy for Treatment of Renal Stones
NCT03932370 ·Status: COMPLETED
-
Transurethral Versus Percutaneous Endoscopic Management of Bladder Stones in Boys
NCT03294239 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Ultrasonic vs. Fluoroscopic Guided PNL in Pediatric Renal Stones
NCT03250559 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA