MedTrace Logo

Bendable Suction Ureteral Access Sheath Versus Conventional Ureteral Access Sheath in Management of Renal Stones Using Flexible Ureteroscopy

NCT06862141 · Status: RECRUITING · Phase: NA · Type: INTERVENTIONAL · Enrollment: 172

Last updated 2025-03-11

No results posted yet for this study

Summary

Urinary calculus is a globally recognized urological condition, with prevalence rates ranging from 1% to 13% across different geographical regions (1) Therapeutic approaches for renal calculi encompass extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy (ESWL) and minimally invasive endoscopic surgical techniques, such as percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL) and retrograde intrarenal surgery (RIRS). Treatment plans depend on the characteristics of calculi, patient factors, surgeon experience and the condition of medical centers. According to the guidelines of American Urologic Association (AUA) and European Association of Urology (EAU), patients with a burden of less than 20 mm in kidney calculi can choose RIRS as the frst-line surgical treatment with good stone-free rate (SFR). (2, 3) The application of RIRS for urinary stones has increased signifcantly, and the indications have expanded due to developments in minimally invasive technology and equipment. (4) With the development of stone retrieval devices and miniaturized fexible ureteroscopes, RIRS is more widely used for treating renal calculi, even for high burden stones. (5, 6) The application of ureteral access sheath (UAS) in RIRS can improve surgical vision, reduce intrarenal pressure (IRP), and decrease postoperative infectious complications. (7-9) Several reports have demonstrated the superiority of suctioning UAS, including shorter operation time, higher SFR and lower incidence of infectious complications compared with traditional ureteral access sheath, but none of these suctioning UAS can reach the renal calyces. (10-12)

A novel tip-flexible suctioning ureteral access sheath with flexible terminal was designed, which delivered the tip of the ureteral access sheath to renal calyces. However, data comparing novel tip-flexible suctioning ureteral access and traditional ureteral access sheath is lacking in RIRS.

Therefore, we designed a prospective controlled analysis to compare the efficacy and safety of novel tip-flexible suctioning ureteral access sheath and traditional ureteral access sheath combined with flexible ureteroscope (FURS) in treating renal calculi.

Conditions

  • Nephrolithiasis
  • Flexible Ureteroscopy

Interventions

DEVICE

bendable suction ureteral access sheath

flexible ureteroscopy will be done using bendable suction ureteral access sheath

DEVICE

conventional suction ureteral access sheath

flexible ureteroscopy will be done using conventional suction ureteral access sheath

Sponsors & Collaborators

  • Menoufia University

    lead OTHER

Study Design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
SINGLE
Model
PARALLEL

Eligibility

Min Age
18 Years
Max Age
70 Years
Sex
ALL
Healthy Volunteers
No

Timeline & Regulatory

Start
2024-10-01
Primary Completion
2025-12-01
Completion
2026-02-01
FDA Device
Yes

Countries

  • Egypt

More Related Trials

Read the full study record

This page highlights key information. For complete eligibility criteria, study locations, investigator contacts, and the full protocol, visit the original record on ClinicalTrials.gov.

View NCT06862141 on ClinicalTrials.gov