Vacuum-Assisted Mini-Percutaneous Versus Transurethral Cystolithotripsy in Pediatric Bladder Stones
NCT07614880 · Status: RECRUITING · Phase: NA · Type: INTERVENTIONAL · Enrollment: 40
Last updated 2026-06-01
Summary
This prospective randomized pilot study will compare vacuum-assisted mini-percutaneous cystolithotripsy with standard transurethral cystolithotripsy for the treatment of bladder stones in children. Forty children aged 2 to 14 years with bladder stone(s) measuring 10 -30 mm will be randomly assigned to one of two surgical approaches. The vacuum-assisted mini-percutaneous group will undergo suprapubic percutaneous access using a mini sheath with suction-assisted fragment evacuation, while the transurethral group will undergo standard transurethral cystolithotripsy. The primary outcome will be total operative time. Secondary outcomes will include stone-free rate ,lithotripsy time and fragment clearance time, urethral mucosal injury, postoperative hematuria, fever, urinary tract infection, sepsis, urinary retention, urinary leakage from the suprapubic tract, catheterization time, hospital stay, postoperative pain, analgesic requirement, need for auxiliary procedures or conversion, and recurrence or urethral stricture-related symptoms during follow-up.
Conditions
- Pediatric Bladder Stones
- Bladder Calculi
- Pediatric Urolithiasis
Interventions
- PROCEDURE
-
Vacuum-Assisted Mini-Percutaneous Cystolithotripsy
Surgical treatment of pediatric bladder stones using suprapubic mini-percutaneous bladder access, a suction-assisted mini sheath, and Ho:YAG laser lithotripsy for stone fragmentation and evacuation
- PROCEDURE
-
Transurethral Cystolithotripsy
Standard transurethral endoscopic treatment of pediatric bladder stones using an appropriate pediatric semi-rigid ureteroscope with Ho:YAG laser lithotripsy and transurethral fragment evacuation
Sponsors & Collaborators
-
Beni-Suef University
lead OTHER
Study Design
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Masking
- SINGLE
- Model
- PARALLEL
Eligibility
- Min Age
- 2 Years
- Max Age
- 14 Years
- Sex
- ALL
- Healthy Volunteers
- No
Timeline & Regulatory
- Start
- 2026-03-04
- Primary Completion
- 2028-02-29
- Completion
- 2028-03-31
Countries
- Egypt
Study Locations
More Related Trials
-
Shock Wave Lithotripsy Using Fluoroscopic Versus Ultrasonic Localization
NCT05413603 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Stepwise Shock Wave Lithotripsy in Pediatric Urolithiasis
NCT01807260 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Clinical Efficacy of Mini-PCNLversus RIRS for the Management of Upper Urinary Tract Calculus (1-2.5 cm)
NCT06031103 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Retrograde Intrarenal Surgery for Renal Stones in Pediatrics: A Prospective Analysis of Feasibility and Outcomes.
NCT07089394 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Ureteral Stents Versus Percutaneous Nephrostomy for Initial Urinary Drainage
NCT02055430 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Comparison Between Supine Mini-PCNL and Flexible Ureteroscopy (FURS) for Dense Lower Calyceal Stones (1-2 cm) in School-Age Pediatric Patients
NCT07345234 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Efficacy And Safety Of Antegrade Uretroscopic Lithotripsy Versus Retrograde Ureteroscopic Lithotripsy In The Treatment Of Upper Ureteric Stones Measuring > 10 mm In Maximum Dimension. A Randomized Comparative Study
NCT07362784 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Treatment of Upper Ureteric Stones
NCT02469766 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: PHASE4
-
Optical Motion Capture-Assisted Ultrasound for Pediatric ESWL
NCT07299032 ·Status: NOT_YET_RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Flexible Ureteroscopy Versus Extracorporeal Shock Wave Lithotripsy
NCT07193940 ·Status: NOT_YET_RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Shear Wave Elastography for Predicting Extracorporeal Shock Wave Lithotripsy Outcomes in Pediatric Renal Stones
NCT07506031 ·Status: RECRUITING
-
Comparison Between Two Methods for Renal Stone Treatment Mini Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy and Flexible Ureteroscopy With Suction Sheath
NCT07306819 ·Status: RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Ultra-Mini Versus Standard Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy For Management Of Renal Calculi. A Randomized Controlled Trial.
NCT04764071 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: PHASE3
-
F-URS and Mini PCNL for Pediatric Urolithiasis
NCT06571617 ·Status: NOT_YET_RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
The Efficacy and Safety of Medical Expulsive Therapy After Extracorporeal Shock Wave Lithotripsy (ESWL) in Pediatric Urolithiasis
NCT05759767 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Shockwave Lithotripsy (SWL) Versus SWL and Oral Dissolution Therapy (ODT) For Paediatrics Radiolucent Renal Stone
NCT05896345 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Paravertebral Versus Caudal Block in Pediatric PCNL
NCT05012215 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
A Prospective Observational Comparison of SMP and ESWL for the Treatment of Renal Stones ≥20 mm in Children (IAU-04)
NCT04317443 ·Status: UNKNOWN
-
Delayed or Direct Ureteroscopy in the Treatment of Pediatric Calcular Anuria
NCT02139059 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Shock Wave Lithotripsy Versus Visual Cystolitholapaxy in The Management of Patients Presenting With Calcular Acute Urinary Retention: A Randomized Controlled Trial.
NCT02594631 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: PHASE4
-
Supine Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy
NCT04869969 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: PHASE2/PHASE3
-
Ultrasonic vs. Fluoroscopic Guided PNL in Pediatric Renal Stones
NCT03250559 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Mini- Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy Versus Extracorporeal Shock Wave Lithotripsy for High Density Renal Stones
NCT04346134 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Tubeless vs Tube PCNL in Pediatric Nephrolithiasis: A Randomized Controlled Trial.
NCT07183930 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Trial of Ureteroscopy vs Steerable Continuous Flow Aspiration Technology
NCT07101809 ·Status: RECRUITING ·Phase: NA