COMPARISON OF FANS VS CONVENTIONAL URETERAL ACCESS SHEATH in RIRS on POSTOPERATIVE ACUTE KIDNEY INJURY
NCT07685587 · Status: RECRUITING · Phase: NA · Type: INTERVENTIONAL · Enrollment: 108
Last updated 2026-07-06
Summary
Kidney stone disease is a common condition, and retrograde intrarenal surgery (RIRS) is a minimally invasive procedure frequently used to remove kidney stones. During RIRS, pressure inside the kidney can increase, which may contribute to temporary kidney injury. New aspiration-enabled access sheath systems have been developed to better control this pressure by continuously removing irrigation fluid during surgery. This study will compare aspiration and conventional access sheath systems to determine whether improved pressure control reduces early kidney injury. Blood and urine biomarkers (IL-18 and L-FABP), which can detect kidney damage earlier than standard kidney function tests, will be measured before and after surgery. The results may help identify surgical techniques that better protect kidney function and improve the safety of kidney stone treatment for patients.
Conditions
- Urolithiasis
Interventions
- DEVICE
-
flexible and navigable ureteral access sheath
Patients of RIRS operated with flexible and navigable ureteral access sheath
- DEVICE
-
conventional ureteral access sheath
Patients of RIRS operated with conventional ureteral access sheath
Sponsors & Collaborators
-
Namik Kemal University
lead OTHER
Study Design
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Purpose
- SCREENING
- Masking
- SINGLE
- Model
- PARALLEL
Eligibility
- Min Age
- 18 Years
- Sex
- ALL
- Healthy Volunteers
- No
Timeline & Regulatory
- Start
- 2026-05-04
- Primary Completion
- 2027-06-30
- Completion
- 2027-06-30
Countries
- Turkey (Türkiye)
Study Locations
More Related Trials
-
Flexible and Navigable Suction Ureteral Access Sheath (FANS) vs Conventional Access Sheaths in RIRS: A Prospective Randomized Study.
NCT07377461 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Evaluation of Renal Injury After RIRS Using Shear-Wave Elastography
NCT07615452 ·Status: NOT_YET_RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Comparison of Flexible & Navigable Suction Ureteral Access Sheath vs. Antegrade Suction in Retrograde Flexible Ureteroscopy for Lower Calyceal Stones
NCT06889051 ·Status: NOT_YET_RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Retrograde Intrarenal Surgery (RIRS) With High-Power Laser and Flexible, Navigable Suction Access Sheath (FANS) vs Mini-Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy (miniPCNL) for 2-3 cm Renal Stones
NCT07349992 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Sheathless, Traditional, and Suction Access Sheath RIRS for Renal Stones ≤2 cm
NCT07289230 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Retrograde Intrarenal Surgery (RIRS) With Suction
NCT06786715 ·Status: ACTIVE_NOT_RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Effect of Complete Suction-Induced Collapse of the Renal Collecting System at the End of RIRS on Early Postoperative Outcomes
NCT07535281 ·Status: RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Which Patinets Benefit More From Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy? A Location-Based Comparative Analysis of PCNL and RIRS for 1-2 cm Renal Stones
NCT07589153 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Ureteral Access Sheaths in Endoscopic Kidney Stone Surgery
NCT07568990 ·Status: RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Tip Bendable Suction Ureteral Access Sheath vs. Traditional Ureteral Access Sheath in Retrograde Intrarenal Stone Surgery
NCT05952635 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Investigate the Renal Movement by Single Lung Ventilation in Patients Administered RIRS for Kidney Stones.
NCT03060837 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Impact of Surgical Position on Stone-Free Rates in Retrograde Intrarenal Surgery
NCT06809582 ·Status: RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
A Novel Method for Retrograde Intrarenal Surgery (RIRS)
NCT05202158 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
RIRS With Flex Suction Sheath vs. PCNL for 2-3 cm Renal Stones
NCT07058402 ·Status: RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
The Effect of Different Body Positions and Channel Sheaths on RIRS
NCT06438497 ·Status: RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
RIRS With Tip Flexible Pressure-controlling Ureteral Access Sheath Versus Mini PCNLfor Kidney Stones
NCT06209931 ·Status: RECRUITING
-
Outcomes of Using FANS With FURS in TTT of Lower Calyceal Stones.
NCT07238803 ·Status: RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
DISS vs FANS in Suction-Assisted RIRS for Medium-Sized Renal Stones
NCT07516535 ·Status: NOT_YET_RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Comparison of RIRS Versus PCNL Methods, According to Postoperative Pain and Analgesic Demand in 2 to 4 cm Renal Stones
NCT02430168 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: PHASE4
-
Under Direct Vision vs Under Non Direct Vision of Insertion of UAS in RIRS
NCT03717285 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Effect of Negative Pressure Suction on Fluid Absorption and Infection in Flexible Ureteroscopy
NCT07492147 ·Status: RECRUITING
-
Are the Stone Density and Location Useful Parameters for Small Kidney Stones?
NCT03503539 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Analysis of the Effectiveness and Safety of RIRS Under Local Anesthesia and Its Influencing Factors
NCT06737497 ·Status: NOT_YET_RECRUITING
-
FANS vs Standard Ureteral Access Sheath in fURS
NCT07463157 ·Status: NOT_YET_RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Effects of Flexible Ureteroscopy on Renal Blood Flow
NCT03023488 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA