MedTrace Logo

A Comparative Study Between the Usage of Flexible and Navigable Suction Ureteral Access Sheath Versus Traditional Access Sheath in Retrograde Intrarenal Surgeries

NCT07076589 · Status: RECRUITING · Phase: NA · Type: INTERVENTIONAL · Enrollment: 80

Last updated 2026-03-10

No results posted yet for this study

Summary

A comparative study between the Usage of Flexible and Navigable Suction Ureteral Access Sheath (FANS) versus Traditional Access sheath in RIRS : Randomized controlled trial .

Conditions

  • Stones, Kidney
  • Ureter Stones

Interventions

PROCEDURE

FURS

FURS using traditional UAS \& FANS

Sponsors & Collaborators

  • Yosseif elhousseiny ammar ahmed

    lead OTHER

Principal Investigators

  • Ahmed Yehia Abdelaziz Mohammed, Professor of urology · Cairo University

Study Design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
TRIPLE
Model
PARALLEL

Eligibility

Min Age
14 Years
Sex
ALL
Healthy Volunteers
No

Timeline & Regulatory

Start
2025-06-01
Primary Completion
2026-03-01
Completion
2026-03-03

Countries

  • Egypt

Study Locations

More Related Trials

Read the full study record

This page highlights key information. For complete eligibility criteria, study locations, investigator contacts, and the full protocol, visit the original record on ClinicalTrials.gov.

View NCT07076589 on ClinicalTrials.gov