Flexible and Navigable Suction Ureteral Access Sheath (FANS) vs Conventional Access Sheaths in RIRS: A Prospective Randomized Study.
NCT07377461 · Status: COMPLETED · Phase: NA · Type: INTERVENTIONAL · Enrollment: 50
Last updated 2026-02-09
Summary
Kidney stones located in the kidney are commonly treated using a minimally invasive procedure called retrograde intrarenal surgery (RIRS). During this procedure, a ureteral access sheath is often used to facilitate repeated access to the kidney, improve visualization, and allow irrigation fluid to drain.
Newer access sheaths have been developed with flexible distal tips and built-in suction capabilities, which may help reduce operative time by improving visibility and removing stone fragments and irrigation fluid more efficiently.
This prospective randomized study compared a flexible and navigable suction ureteral access sheath with a conventional ureteral access sheath in adult patients undergoing RIRS for kidney stones measuring 10 mm or larger. Participants were randomly assigned to one of the two access sheath types.
The primary objective of the study was to evaluate whether the use of a suction-enabled access sheath reduces operative time. Secondary objectives included assessment of complications, length of hospital stay, stone-free rate, and need for additional interventions.
Conditions
- Kidney Stones
- Nephrolithiasis
Interventions
- DEVICE
-
Flexible and Navigable Suction Ureteral Access Sheath (FANS)
Use of a flexible distal-tip ureteral access sheath with integrated suction during retrograde intrarenal surgery to facilitate access, irrigation control, and fragment evacuation.
- DEVICE
-
Conventional Ureteral Access Sheath
Use of a standard ureteral access sheath without suction during retrograde intrarenal surgery.
Sponsors & Collaborators
-
Barzilai Medical Center
lead OTHER
Study Design
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Masking
- NONE
- Model
- PARALLEL
Eligibility
- Min Age
- 18 Years
- Sex
- ALL
- Healthy Volunteers
- No
Timeline & Regulatory
- Start
- 2024-01-01
- Primary Completion
- 2024-11-01
- Completion
- 2024-11-30
Countries
- Israel
Study Locations
More Related Trials
-
Comparison of Flexible & Navigable Suction Ureteral Access Sheath vs. Antegrade Suction in Retrograde Flexible Ureteroscopy for Lower Calyceal Stones
NCT06889051 ·Status: NOT_YET_RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Tip Bendable Suction Ureteral Access Sheath vs. Traditional Ureteral Access Sheath in Retrograde Intrarenal Stone Surgery
NCT05952635 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Safety and Efficacy of Traditional Versus Flexible and Navigable Suction Sheath in Retrograde Intra-Renal Stone Surgery
NCT07286071 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
RIRS With Flex Suction Sheath vs. PCNL for 2-3 cm Renal Stones
NCT07058402 ·Status: RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
FANS-Assisted Mini-PCNL for Complex Renal Stones
NCT07332286 ·Status: ACTIVE_NOT_RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Sheathless, Traditional, and Suction Access Sheath RIRS for Renal Stones ≤2 cm
NCT07289230 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
The Effect of Different Body Positions and Channel Sheaths on RIRS
NCT06438497 ·Status: RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
RIRS With Tip Flexible Pressure-controlling Ureteral Access Sheath Versus Mini PCNLfor Kidney Stones
NCT06209931 ·Status: RECRUITING
-
Effect of Ureteral Access Sheath Use on Postoperative Pain Level in Patients Undergoing RIRS
NCT02501525 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
RIRS for Treatment of Stones in Congenital Anomalous Kidneys
NCT05240170 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Steerable vs Conventional FANS for <2cm Lower Pole Stone Treatment: SCULPT Trial
NCT06898216 ·Status: RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Bendable Suction Ureteral Access Sheath Versus Conventional Ureteral Access Sheath in Management of Renal Stones Using Flexible Ureteroscopy
NCT06862141 ·Status: RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
FANS-FURS vs Suction Mini-PCNL for 2-3 cm Renal Stones: A Multicenter Randomized Trial
NCT07295860 ·Status: NOT_YET_RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Using Retrograde Intrarenal Surgery for Managing Staghorn Renal Stones.
NCT07342361 ·Status: RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Comparison of Surgical Outcomes Between MPCNL and RIRS
NCT02067221 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Under Direct Vision vs Under Non Direct Vision of Insertion of UAS in RIRS
NCT03717285 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Comparison of Vacuum-Assisted and Conventional Ureteral Access Sheath in Retrograde Intrarenal Surgery
NCT06684756 ·Status: ACTIVE_NOT_RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
A Retrospective, Multi-center Real-world Study of Steerable Ureteroscopic Renal Evacuation (SURE) Procedure With the CVAC® System
NCT07225933 ·Status: ACTIVE_NOT_RECRUITING
-
Measurement of Resistance During UAS Insertion Procedure in RIRS
NCT03919227 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Flexible Ureteroscopy With and Without Ureteral Access Sheath in Treatment of Large Renal Stones
NCT06122129 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Analysis of the Effectiveness and Safety of RIRS Under Local Anesthesia and Its Influencing Factors
NCT06737497 ·Status: NOT_YET_RECRUITING
-
Silodosin in Facilitating Flexible Uretroscopy
NCT07068087 ·Status: ACTIVE_NOT_RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Prospective Assessment of Procedure-Related and Patient-Reported Outcomes After Retrograde Intrarenal Surgery (RIRS) for Renal Calculi Less Than 20 mm
NCT03719456 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Investigate the Renal Movement by Single Lung Ventilation in Patients Administered RIRS for Kidney Stones.
NCT03060837 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Dusting vs Basketing in RIRS: a Single-center Prospective Randomised Trial
NCT03207659 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA