Tip Bendable Suction Ureteral Access Sheath vs. Traditional Ureteral Access Sheath in Retrograde Intrarenal Stone Surgery
NCT05952635 · Status: COMPLETED · Phase: NA · Type: INTERVENTIONAL · Enrollment: 320
Last updated 2024-06-25
Summary
Nephrolithiasis is the most common chronic kidney condition and affecting approximately one in every 10-17 people in the world\[1,2\]. Flexible ureteroscopy (f-URS) has become one of the most common treatments for ureteral and renal stones with minimal complications. The development of ureteral access sheath (UAS) is a significant advance in flexible ureteroscopic management of urinary stones. The UAS has two major advantages: 1) facilitating multiple entries into the renal collecting system without causing recurrent trauma to the ureter and permit expeditious basketing of multiple stone fragments, 2) improving the irrigation with better fluid outflow, thereby reducing the renal pelvic pressure (RPP) and risk of infectious complications.
The tip bendable suction ureteral access sheath (S-UAS) is a novel UAS that has good flexibility and deformability at the tip, which can passively bend (bend \>90°) with the bending of f-URS and can connect to a vacuum suction device. Preliminary study showed that S-UAS can follow f-URS to cross the UPJ and into the renal pelvis and calices. S-UAS close to the stone can achieve complete stone-free status in RIRS. However, further clinical studies and comparisons with available techniques are required. This prospective, single-blinded, single-center, randomized control trial will evaluate the stone free rates, operative time, postoperative complications following RIRS with S-UAS. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first study to compare the clinical benefits of RIRS with S-UAS and traditional UAS.
Conditions
- Kidney Stone
Interventions
- PROCEDURE
-
Tip bendable suction ureteral access sheath
Patient use tip bendable suction ureteral access sheath during flexible ureteroscopy to see if flexible ureteroscopy with S-UAS offers the better treatment outcomes in terms of clinical effectiveness and post-operative complications.
Sponsors & Collaborators
-
Xinhua Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine
collaborator OTHER -
Xiangya Hospital of Central South University
collaborator OTHER -
Xinchang County Hospital of Traditional Chinese Medicine
collaborator UNKNOWN -
Prof. Dr. Ilhan Varank Education and Training Hospital
collaborator UNKNOWN -
Jose R. Reyes Memorial Medical Center
collaborator OTHER_GOV -
Guizhou Provincial People's Hospital
collaborator OTHER -
University of Malaya
collaborator OTHER -
The First Affiliated Hospital of Guangzhou Medical University
lead OTHER
Study Design
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Masking
- SINGLE
- Model
- PARALLEL
Eligibility
- Min Age
- 18 Years
- Sex
- ALL
- Healthy Volunteers
- No
Timeline & Regulatory
- Start
- 2023-08-02
- Primary Completion
- 2024-02-28
- Completion
- 2024-06-21
Countries
- China
Study Locations
More Related Trials
-
The Effect of Different Body Positions and Channel Sheaths on RIRS
NCT06438497 ·Status: RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Intrarenal Pressure Monitoring Via Flexible and Navigable Suction Ureteral Access Sheath in Retrograde Intrarenal Surgery
NCT06729801 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Sheathless, Traditional, and Suction Access Sheath RIRS for Renal Stones ≤2 cm
NCT07289230 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Safety and Efficacy of Traditional Versus Flexible and Navigable Suction Sheath in Retrograde Intra-Renal Stone Surgery
NCT07286071 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Analysis of the Effectiveness and Safety of RIRS Under Local Anesthesia and Its Influencing Factors
NCT06737497 ·Status: NOT_YET_RECRUITING
-
FANS-Assisted Mini-PCNL for Complex Renal Stones
NCT07332286 ·Status: ACTIVE_NOT_RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
The Effect of Anesthesia Type on RIRS
NCT03373617 ·Status: COMPLETED
-
Ureteroscopy Combined With Negative Pressure Sheath Treatment of Kidney Stones
NCT06938113 ·Status: ENROLLING_BY_INVITATION
-
Comparison of Flexible & Navigable Suction Ureteral Access Sheath vs. Antegrade Suction in Retrograde Flexible Ureteroscopy for Lower Calyceal Stones
NCT06889051 ·Status: NOT_YET_RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Tip-flexible Semi-rigid Ureterorenoscope Versus Flexible Ureteroscopy in Renal Calculi
NCT02426931 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Steerable vs Conventional FANS for <2cm Lower Pole Stone Treatment: SCULPT Trial
NCT06898216 ·Status: RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
A Prospective Comparison of Fluoroscopic, Sonographic or Combined Approach for Renal Access in Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy
NCT02266381 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Effect of Ureteral Access Sheath Use on Postoperative Pain Level in Patients Undergoing RIRS
NCT02501525 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
A Comparative Study Between the Usage of Flexible and Navigable Suction Ureteral Access Sheath Versus Traditional Access Sheath in Retrograde Intrarenal Surgeries
NCT07076589 ·Status: RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Tamsulosin Assisted Ureteral Access Sheath Insertion
NCT05197088 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: PHASE3
-
A Multicenter Prospective Research on the Treatment of Low Pole Renal Calculus by Flexible Ureteroscope
NCT03105206 ·Status: UNKNOWN
-
SMP vs RIRS for Symptomatic Lower Pole Renal Calculi of 10-20 mm Size: a Randomized Controlled Trial
NCT02519634 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Flexible Ureteroscopy With a Flexible and Navigable Suction Ureteral Access Sheath Versus Mini-Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy for 1-2 cm Lower Pole Kidney Stones
NCT07159035 ·Status: ACTIVE_NOT_RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Treatment of Upper Urinary Tract Stones With a Diameter≤2cm by Intelligent Pressure-controlled Flexible Ureteroscope
NCT05201599 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
7.5F Versus 9.2F Flexible Ureteroscopy for the Treatment of 1-2cm Renal Calculi on Postoperative Infection
NCT05231577 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Comparison of the Efficacy of Flexible Ureteroscope and Percutaneous Nephroscopic Surgery in the Treatment of 2-4cm Kidney Stones
NCT06507176 ·Status: TERMINATED ·Phase: NA
-
Ureteral Access Sheath or Percutaneous Nephrostomy During Flexible Ureteroscopy: Which is Better?
NCT05633030 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Dusting vs Basketing in RIRS: a Single-center Prospective Randomised Trial
NCT03207659 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Comparison of Surgical Outcomes Between MPCNL and RIRS
NCT02067221 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Are the Stone Density and Location Useful Parameters for Small Kidney Stones?
NCT03503539 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA