Which Patinets Benefit More From Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy? A Location-Based Comparative Analysis of PCNL and RIRS for 1-2 cm Renal Stones

NCT07589153 · Status: COMPLETED · Phase: NA · Type: INTERVENTIONAL · Enrollment: 110

Last updated 2026-05-15

No results posted yet for this study

Summary

This prospective randomized controlled trial aims to compare the clinical efficacy and safety of Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy (PCNL) and Retrograde Intrarenal Surgery (RIRS) for renal stones measuring 10-20 mm. The study specifically investigates whether the anatomical location of the stone (upper, middle, or lower calyx) influences the success rates and stone-free outcomes of these two surgical modalities. A total of 110 patients were randomized into two equal groups to evaluate primary endpoints, including stone-free rates at the 3-month follow-up, and secondary endpoints such as operative time and complication rates

Conditions

  • Kidney Calculi Nephrolithiasis Urolithiasis Renal Stone

Interventions

DEVICE

Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy (PCNL)

A standard percutaneous approach was used. Under general anesthesia, a nephrostomy tract was established, and the stone was fragmented using a pneumatic or ultrasonic lithotripter.

DEVICE

Retrograde Intrarenal Surgery (RIRS)

The procedure was performed using a flexible ureterorenoscope. Stones were fragmented using a Holmium:YAG laser fiber after reaching the renal pelvis and calyces retrogradely.

Sponsors & Collaborators

  • Kırıkkale University

    lead OTHER

Study Design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE
Model
PARALLEL

Eligibility

Min Age
18 Years
Sex
ALL
Healthy Volunteers
No

Timeline & Regulatory

Start
2012-05-01
Primary Completion
2013-09-15
Completion
2013-11-01

More Related Trials

Read the full study record

This page highlights key information. For complete eligibility criteria, study locations, investigator contacts, and the full protocol, visit the original record on ClinicalTrials.gov.

View NCT07589153 on ClinicalTrials.gov