Ureteral Access Sheaths in Endoscopic Kidney Stone Surgery
NCT07568990 · Status: NOT_YET_RECRUITING · Phase: NA · Type: INTERVENTIONAL · Enrollment: 70
Last updated 2026-05-06
Summary
This prospective, randomized, comparative study aims to evaluate the impact of aspirating and non-aspirating ureteral access sheaths on success rates and complications in patients undergoing retrograde intrarenal surgery (RIRS) for kidney stones. A total of 70 patients with renal stones smaller than 2 cm will be enrolled and randomly assigned to two groups. One group will undergo RIRS using a non-aspirating ureteral access sheath, while the other group will be treated using an aspirating ureteral access sheath.
The primary outcome of the study is the stone-free rate, which will be assessed at postoperative follow-up. Secondary outcomes include operative time, fluoroscopy time, length of hospital stay, postoperative complications according to the Clavien-Dindo classification, infection-related parameters, and the need for ureteral stenting.
The study aims to determine whether the use of an aspirating access sheath improves surgical outcomes by reducing intrarenal pressure, enhancing visualization, and decreasing complication rates. The findings are expected to contribute to optimizing device selection and improving clinical outcomes in endoscopic kidney stone surgery.
Conditions
- Kidney Stones
Interventions
- DEVICE
-
Non-aspirating ureteral access sheath
A conventional ureteral access sheath that allows passive outflow of irrigation fluid during RIRS.
- DEVICE
-
Aspirating ureteral access sheath
A ureteral access sheath with an active suction system that facilitates removal of irrigation fluid and stone fragments during RIRS.
Sponsors & Collaborators
-
Hitit University
lead OTHER
Study Design
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Masking
- NONE
- Model
- PARALLEL
Eligibility
- Min Age
- 18 Years
- Max Age
- 75 Years
- Sex
- ALL
- Healthy Volunteers
- No
Timeline & Regulatory
- Start
- 2026-04-20
- Primary Completion
- 2026-05-11
- Completion
- 2026-05-11
More Related Trials
-
Retrograde Intrarenal Surgery (RIRS) With High-Power Laser and Flexible, Navigable Suction Access Sheath (FANS) vs Mini-Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy (miniPCNL) for 2-3 cm Renal Stones
NCT07349992 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Comparison of Flexible & Navigable Suction Ureteral Access Sheath vs. Antegrade Suction in Retrograde Flexible Ureteroscopy for Lower Calyceal Stones
NCT06889051 ·Status: NOT_YET_RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Intrarenal Pressure Monitoring Via Flexible and Navigable Suction Ureteral Access Sheath in Retrograde Intrarenal Surgery
NCT06729801 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Flexible Ureteroscopy With Tip-bendable Suction Ureteral Access Sheath Versus Mini-Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy for Treatment of 2-3cm Renal Stones
NCT06526390 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Flexible and Navigable Suction Ureteral Access Sheath (FANS) vs Conventional Access Sheaths in RIRS: A Prospective Randomized Study.
NCT07377461 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
RIRS With Flex Suction Sheath vs. PCNL for 2-3 cm Renal Stones
NCT07058402 ·Status: RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Measurement of Resistance During UAS Insertion Procedure in RIRS
NCT03919227 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Comparison of Vacuum-Assisted and Conventional Ureteral Access Sheath in Retrograde Intrarenal Surgery
NCT06684756 ·Status: ACTIVE_NOT_RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
A Comparative Study Between the Usage of Flexible and Navigable Suction Ureteral Access Sheath Versus Traditional Access Sheath in Retrograde Intrarenal Surgeries
NCT07076589 ·Status: RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Impact Ureteral Sheath Design During Ureteroscopy
NCT03349099 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Effect of Ureteral Access Sheath Use on Postoperative Pain Level in Patients Undergoing RIRS
NCT02501525 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Effect of Complete Suction-Induced Collapse of the Renal Collecting System at the End of RIRS on Early Postoperative Outcomes
NCT07535281 ·Status: RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Effect of Negative Pressure Suction on Fluid Absorption and Infection in Flexible Ureteroscopy
NCT07492147 ·Status: RECRUITING
-
Ureteroscopy Combined With Negative Pressure Sheath Treatment of Kidney Stones
NCT06938113 ·Status: ENROLLING_BY_INVITATION
-
RIRS Versus ESWL for the Treatment of Renal Stones
NCT02645058 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Use of a Ureteral Access Sheath During Ureteroscopy and Its Effect on Stone Free Rate
NCT00199524 ·Status: TERMINATED ·Phase: PHASE4
-
Comparison of Lithotomy Versus Lateral Position in Retrograde Intrarenal Surgery for Lower Calyceal Stones Less Than 2 cm
NCT07310966 ·Status: NOT_YET_RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Steerable vs Conventional FANS for <2cm Lower Pole Stone Treatment: SCULPT Trial
NCT06898216 ·Status: RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Tamsulosin Assisted Ureteral Access Sheath Insertion
NCT05197088 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: PHASE3
-
Retrograde Saline Irrigation During Supine Mini Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy
NCT06879990 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Bendable Suction Ureteral Access Sheath Versus Conventional Ureteral Access Sheath in Management of Renal Stones Using Flexible Ureteroscopy
NCT06862141 ·Status: RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
The Effect of Different Body Positions and Channel Sheaths on RIRS
NCT06438497 ·Status: RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Management of Medium Sized Renal Stones
NCT06720311 ·Status: NOT_YET_RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Comparison Between Two Methods for Renal Stone Treatment Mini Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy and Flexible Ureteroscopy With Suction Sheath
NCT07306819 ·Status: RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
FANS-Assisted Mini-PCNL for Complex Renal Stones
NCT07332286 ·Status: ACTIVE_NOT_RECRUITING ·Phase: NA