DISS vs FANS in Suction-Assisted RIRS for Medium-Sized Renal Stones
NCT07516535 · Status: NOT_YET_RECRUITING · Phase: NA · Type: INTERVENTIONAL · Enrollment: 126
Last updated 2026-04-08
Summary
Kidney stones are a common health problem and may recur frequently, which can affect quality of life and kidney function. Retrograde intrarenal surgery (RIRS) is a minimally invasive treatment used for renal stones, but treatment of medium-sized stones may be associated with longer operative time, impaired visibility during surgery, residual stone fragments, and postoperative infectious complications caused by increased intrarenal pressure.
Suction-assisted retrograde intrarenal surgery (RIRS) techniques have been developed to improve surgical efficiency and safety by facilitating continuous removal of stone fragments and helping control intrarenal pressure. Two commonly used suction-assisted approaches are direct in-scope suction (DISS) and flexible and navigable suction ureteric access sheath (FANS). However, there is limited prospective randomized evidence directly comparing these two techniques.
This randomized prospective clinical study aims to compare direct in-scope suction (DISS) versus flexible and navigable suction ureteric access sheath (FANS) in adult patients with medium-sized renal stones measuring 2 to 3 cm who are undergoing retrograde intrarenal surgery (RIRS). Participants will be randomly assigned to one of the two suction-assisted techniques. The study will evaluate whether flexible and navigable suction ureteric access sheath (FANS) provides better outcomes than direct in-scope suction (DISS) in terms of stone-free rate and postoperative infection rate.
The primary outcome is stone-free status assessed by postoperative imaging. Secondary outcomes include operative time, intraoperative visibility, and postoperative complications, particularly infection and urosepsis. The study hypothesis is that suction-assisted retrograde intrarenal surgery (RIRS) using the flexible and navigable suction ureteric access sheath (FANS) technique will result in a higher stone-free rate and a lower postoperative infection rate compared with direct in-scope suction (DISS) in the management of medium-sized renal stones.
Conditions
- Kidney Stones
- Nephrolithiasis
- Renal Calculi
Interventions
- PROCEDURE
-
Direct In-Scope Suction
Direct suction is applied through the working channel of the flexible ureteroscope during retrograde intrarenal surgery to facilitate evacuation of stone fragments and improve intraoperative visibility during laser lithotripsy.
- PROCEDURE
-
Flexible and Navigable Suction Ureteric Access Sheath
A flexible and navigable suction ureteric access sheath is used during retrograde intrarenal surgery to provide suction-assisted evacuation of stone fragments, improve visibility, and support intrarenal pressure control during laser lithotripsy.
Sponsors & Collaborators
-
Ain Shams University
lead OTHER
Study Design
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Masking
- NONE
- Model
- PARALLEL
Eligibility
- Min Age
- 18 Years
- Max Age
- 60 Years
- Sex
- ALL
- Healthy Volunteers
- No
Timeline & Regulatory
- Start
- 2026-04-30
- Primary Completion
- 2027-04-30
- Completion
- 2027-04-30
Countries
- Egypt
Study Locations
More Related Trials
-
Safety and Efficacy of Traditional Versus Flexible and Navigable Suction Sheath in Retrograde Intra-Renal Stone Surgery
NCT07286071 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Flexible and Navigable Suction Ureteral Access Sheath (FANS) vs Conventional Access Sheaths in RIRS: A Prospective Randomized Study.
NCT07377461 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
FANS vs Standard Ureteral Access Sheath in fURS
NCT07463157 ·Status: NOT_YET_RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Prospective Assessment of Procedure-Related and Patient-Reported Outcomes After Retrograde Intrarenal Surgery (RIRS) for Renal Calculi Less Than 20 mm
NCT03719456 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Comparison of RIRS Versus PCNL Methods, According to Postoperative Pain and Analgesic Demand in 2 to 4 cm Renal Stones
NCT02430168 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: PHASE4
-
Tip Bendable Suction Ureteral Access Sheath vs. Traditional Ureteral Access Sheath in Retrograde Intrarenal Stone Surgery
NCT05952635 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Are the Stone Density and Location Useful Parameters for Small Kidney Stones?
NCT03503539 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
RIRS for Treatment of Stones in Congenital Anomalous Kidneys
NCT05240170 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
RIRS Versus ESWL for the Treatment of Renal Stones
NCT02645058 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Comparison of Flexible & Navigable Suction Ureteral Access Sheath vs. Antegrade Suction in Retrograde Flexible Ureteroscopy for Lower Calyceal Stones
NCT06889051 ·Status: NOT_YET_RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Effect of Ureteral Access Sheath Use on Postoperative Pain Level in Patients Undergoing RIRS
NCT02501525 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Retrograde Intrarenal Surgery Versus Extracorporeal Shockwave Lithotripsy
NCT07510178 ·Status: NOT_YET_RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Intrarenal Pressure Monitoring Via Flexible and Navigable Suction Ureteral Access Sheath in Retrograde Intrarenal Surgery
NCT06729801 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Safety and Efficacy of Fluoroscopy-free Technique During Retrograde Intrarenal Surgery for Renal Stones
NCT05269108 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
7.5F Versus 9.2F Flexible Ureteroscopy for the Treatment of 1-2cm Renal Calculi on Postoperative Infection
NCT05231577 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Comparison of Safety and Efficiency of 20w 30w Holmium Laser Device in Treatment of 1-2 cm Diameter Kidney Stones With RIRS
NCT02451319 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: PHASE4
-
FANS-FURS vs Suction Mini-PCNL for 2-3 cm Renal Stones: A Multicenter Randomized Trial
NCT07295860 ·Status: NOT_YET_RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
RIRS With Tip Flexible Pressure-controlling Ureteral Access Sheath Versus Mini PCNLfor Kidney Stones
NCT06209931 ·Status: RECRUITING
-
RIRS With Flex Suction Sheath vs. PCNL for 2-3 cm Renal Stones
NCT07058402 ·Status: RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Forced Diuresis After Flexible Ureteroscopy for Medium-Sized Renal Stones
NCT07336485 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Mini-PNL, RIRS, and ESWL for Treatment of Medium-Sized, High-Density, Non-Lower Pole, Renal Stones
NCT04856722 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Investigate the Renal Movement by Single Lung Ventilation in Patients Administered RIRS for Kidney Stones.
NCT03060837 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Effect of Negative Pressure Suction on Fluid Absorption and Infection in Flexible Ureteroscopy
NCT07492147 ·Status: RECRUITING
-
Measurement of Resistance During UAS Insertion Procedure in RIRS
NCT03919227 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Postoperative Outcomes of PCNL vs RIRS in Obese Patients With Pelvic 1.5:3 cm Renal Stones
NCT06175910 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA