Impact of Surgical Position on Stone-Free Rates in Retrograde Intrarenal Surgery
NCT06809582 · Status: RECRUITING · Phase: NA · Type: INTERVENTIONAL · Enrollment: 128
Last updated 2025-08-15
Summary
The goal of this clinical trial is to determine whether the surgical position during retrograde intrarenal surgery (RIRS) affects stone-free rates in adults with kidney stones. The main questions it aims to answer are:
* Does the modified lithotomy position result in a higher stone-free rate compared to the standard lithotomy position?
* Are there differences in complication rates between the two surgical positions?
Researchers will compare patients undergoing RIRS in the standard lithotomy position to those in the modified lithotomy position (30-degree Trendelenburg with elevated surgical side) to assess its impact on stone clearance and surgical outcomes.
Participants will:
* Be randomly assigned to one of two surgical positions
* Undergo RIRS with standard surgical procedures
* Have follow-up imaging to assess stone clearance after surgery
This study aims to improve surgical techniques and patient outcomes in kidney stone treatment.
Conditions
- Stone, Kidney
- Stones, Kidney
- Stone;Renal
Interventions
- PROCEDURE
-
The T-Tilt position
The T-Tilt position is a modified lithotomy position used during retrograde intrarenal surgery (RIRS). In this position: The patient is placed in a 30-degree Trendelenburg position, meaning the head is slightly lower than the feet. The surgical side is elevated at a 30-degree angle to improve access to the kidney. This modified positioning is designed to enhance stone clearance, particularly by facilitating the movement of stone fragments away from the lower kidney calyces, where residual stones often remain. Researchers will compare this position to the standard lithotomy position to determine its impact on stone-free rates and surgical outcomes.
Sponsors & Collaborators
-
Ondokuz Mayıs University
lead OTHER
Principal Investigators
-
Murat Gulsen · Ondokuz Mayıs University
Study Design
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Masking
- TRIPLE
- Model
- PARALLEL
Eligibility
- Min Age
- 18 Years
- Sex
- ALL
- Healthy Volunteers
- No
Timeline & Regulatory
- Start
- 2025-01-01
- Primary Completion
- 2025-12-01
- Completion
- 2026-06-01
Countries
- Turkey (Türkiye)
Study Locations
More Related Trials
-
Effects of Flexible Ureteroscopy on Renal Blood Flow
NCT03023488 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
The Effect of Different Body Positions and Channel Sheaths on RIRS
NCT06438497 ·Status: RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Evaluation of Retrograde Intrarenal Surgery Results and Stone-free Rate in Children With Kidney Stones
NCT06138704 ·Status: COMPLETED
-
Comparison of Lithotomy Versus Lateral Position in Retrograde Intrarenal Surgery for Lower Calyceal Stones Less Than 2 cm
NCT07310966 ·Status: NOT_YET_RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Comparison of RIRS Versus PCNL Methods, According to Postoperative Pain and Analgesic Demand in 2 to 4 cm Renal Stones
NCT02430168 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: PHASE4
-
RIRS Versus ESWL for the Treatment of Renal Stones
NCT02645058 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Safety and Efficacy of Different Irrigation System in Retrograde Intrarenal Surgery
NCT05018546 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Effect of Tidal Volume on fURS Parameters
NCT07304297 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Sheathless, Traditional, and Suction Access Sheath RIRS for Renal Stones ≤2 cm
NCT07289230 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Under Direct Vision vs Under Non Direct Vision of Insertion of UAS in RIRS
NCT03717285 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Prospective Assessment of Procedure-Related and Patient-Reported Outcomes After Retrograde Intrarenal Surgery (RIRS) for Renal Calculi Less Than 20 mm
NCT03719456 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Measurement of Resistance During UAS Insertion Procedure in RIRS
NCT03919227 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
RIRS With Tip Flexible Pressure-controlling Ureteral Access Sheath Versus Mini PCNLfor Kidney Stones
NCT06209931 ·Status: RECRUITING
-
The Role of Preoperative Ureteral Diameter Measurements in Predicting Difficult Access During Retrograde Intrarenal Surgery: A Retrospective Analysis of 234 Patients
NCT06746779 ·Status: COMPLETED
-
Comparison of Surgical Outcomes Between MPCNL and RIRS
NCT02067221 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Evaluation of Different Treatment Modalities for Lower Pole and Renal Pelvis Stones
NCT02522676 ·Status: SUSPENDED ·Phase: NA
-
Cost-Effectiveness of Different Treatment Options for Lower Calyceal Stones
NCT03614247 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Homework in Retrograde Intrarenal Surgery
NCT06795256 ·Status: RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Effectiveness of US-Guided PCNL Different Positions in Renal Stones Treatment
NCT05855057 ·Status: COMPLETED
-
Staged Bilateral Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy
NCT05340075 ·Status: COMPLETED
-
Comparing Different Diameter fURSs With Similar RESDs for the Treatment of Upper Urinary Tract Stones
NCT06987760 ·Status: RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Tip Bendable Suction Ureteral Access Sheath vs. Traditional Ureteral Access Sheath in Retrograde Intrarenal Stone Surgery
NCT05952635 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Optimal Passive Dilation Time in Retrograde Intrarenal Surgery
NCT05340088 ·Status: COMPLETED
-
Comparison of Vacuum-Assisted and Conventional Ureteral Access Sheath in Retrograde Intrarenal Surgery
NCT06684756 ·Status: ACTIVE_NOT_RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Effect of Ureteral Access Sheath Use on Postoperative Pain Level in Patients Undergoing RIRS
NCT02501525 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA