Retrograde Intrarenal Surgery Versus Extracorporeal Shockwave Lithotripsy
NCT07510178 · Status: NOT_YET_RECRUITING · Phase: NA · Type: INTERVENTIONAL · Enrollment: 66
Last updated 2026-04-15
Summary
The study's aim is to determine which treatment modality, either ESWL or RIRS, is more effective in achieving stone clearance for lower calyceal calculi.
Investigators hypothesize that retrograde intrarenal surgery is better as compared to extracorporeal shockwave lithotripsy. It will target those patients suffering from kidney stones in lower calyces with sizes up to 1.5 cm in an open-label, randomized controlled trial.
Conditions
- Renal Stone
- Stone in Calyceal Diverticulum
Interventions
- PROCEDURE
-
Retrograde intrarenal surgery
Retrograde intrarenal surgery (RIRS) is a minimally invasive procedure in which a flexible ureteroscope is passed through the urethra, then the ureter, and then into the kidney, and then with the help of the laser, stones are broken down into small fragments, which can be retrieved either at the same time or flushed later in urine. Stone clearance will assessed with an X-ray of the abdomen (radiopaque) and ultrasound or CT scan of the kidneys (residual radiolucent stones) on follow-up.
- PROCEDURE
-
Extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy
Extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy (ESWL) is a noninvasive procedure in which highly focused shock waves are delivered at the renal calculi, which then break down into small pieces and later pass in urine. An X-ray abdomen (radiopaque) and ultrasound or CT scan of the kidneys (residual radiolucent stone) will be used on follow-up to assess stone clearance. Up to 3 sessions of ESWL will given to the selected candidate
Sponsors & Collaborators
-
Sindh Institute of Urology and Transplantation
lead OTHER
Principal Investigators
-
Abdul Khaliq, FCPS · Sindh Institute of Urology and Transplantation
Study Design
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Masking
- NONE
- Model
- PARALLEL
Eligibility
- Min Age
- 18 Years
- Max Age
- 60 Years
- Sex
- ALL
- Healthy Volunteers
- No
Timeline & Regulatory
- Start
- 2026-04-30
- Primary Completion
- 2026-10-30
- Completion
- 2026-10-30
Countries
- Pakistan
Study Locations
More Related Trials
-
Ultra Mini Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy VS Stented Extracorporeal Shock Wave Lithotripsy for Stone Management
NCT05697341 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Comparison of Lithotomy Versus Lateral Position in Retrograde Intrarenal Surgery for Lower Calyceal Stones Less Than 2 cm
NCT07310966 ·Status: NOT_YET_RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Retrograde Intrarenal Surgery (RIRS) With High-Power Laser and Flexible, Navigable Suction Access Sheath (FANS) vs Mini-Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy (miniPCNL) for 2-3 cm Renal Stones
NCT07349992 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Outcomes in Lower Pole Kidney Stone Management Using Mini-PCNL Compared With Retrograde Intra Renal Surgery
NCT05714423 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Flexible urétéroscopy Versus Extracorporeal Shockwave Lithotripsy in Renal Calculi
NCT01604304 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Prospective Assessment of Procedure-Related and Patient-Reported Outcomes After Retrograde Intrarenal Surgery (RIRS) for Renal Calculi Less Than 20 mm
NCT03719456 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Extracorporal Shockwave Lithotripsy Versus Retrograde Intrarenal Surgery for the Treatment of Kidney Stones
NCT01514032 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Sheathless, Traditional, and Suction Access Sheath RIRS for Renal Stones ≤2 cm
NCT07289230 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
ESWL vs URS in Management of Upper Third Ureteric Calculi
NCT03559738 ·Status: COMPLETED
-
Analysis of the Effectiveness and Safety of RIRS Under Local Anesthesia and Its Influencing Factors
NCT06737497 ·Status: NOT_YET_RECRUITING
-
RIRS With Tip Flexible Pressure-controlling Ureteral Access Sheath Versus Mini PCNLfor Kidney Stones
NCT06209931 ·Status: RECRUITING
-
Safety and Efficacy of Different Irrigation System in Retrograde Intrarenal Surgery
NCT05018546 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Postoperative Outcomes of PCNL vs RIRS in Obese Patients With Pelvic 1.5:3 cm Renal Stones
NCT06175910 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Flexible Ureteroscopy Versus ESWL in the Management of Lower Calyceal Stones
NCT02658942 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
RIRS With Flex Suction Sheath vs. PCNL for 2-3 cm Renal Stones
NCT07058402 ·Status: RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Cost-Effectiveness of Different Treatment Options for Lower Calyceal Stones
NCT03614247 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Are the Stone Density and Location Useful Parameters for Small Kidney Stones?
NCT03503539 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Comparison of RIRS Versus PCNL Methods, According to Postoperative Pain and Analgesic Demand in 2 to 4 cm Renal Stones
NCT02430168 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: PHASE4
-
Mini-PNL, RIRS, and ESWL for Treatment of Medium-Sized, High-Density, Non-Lower Pole, Renal Stones
NCT04856722 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Flexible Ureteroscopy Versus Extracorporeal Shock Wave Lithotripsy
NCT07193940 ·Status: NOT_YET_RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Flexible Mini Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy Vs Retrograde Intra-renal Surgery
NCT06249100 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: PHASE2/PHASE3
-
Escalating, Constant and Reduction Energy Output in SWL for Renal Stones
NCT02037906 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Comparison of Ureteroscopic Lithotripsy and Laparoscopic Ureterolithotomy for the Treatment of Unilateral Upper Ureteral Stone
NCT07197385 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Tip Bendable Suction Ureteral Access Sheath vs. Traditional Ureteral Access Sheath in Retrograde Intrarenal Stone Surgery
NCT05952635 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Management of Medium Sized Renal Stones
NCT06720311 ·Status: NOT_YET_RECRUITING ·Phase: NA