Postoperative Outcomes of PCNL vs RIRS in Obese Patients With Pelvic 1.5:3 cm Renal Stones
NCT06175910 · Status: COMPLETED · Phase: NA · Type: INTERVENTIONAL · Enrollment: 182
Last updated 2023-12-19
Summary
This prospective randomized comparative study was done at Helwan University Hospital. It was conducted on 120 patients with unilateral pelvic renal stones from 1.5 to 3 cm in largest diameter who was admitted through duration to compare the two procedures differences in terms of complications, analgesic use, hospital stay, operational time, and stone-free rates.
Conditions
- Renal Stones
Interventions
- PROCEDURE
-
percutaneous nephrolithotomy
A 7 Fr ureteric catheter was placed into the ipsilateral ureteric orifice. The patients were then placed in the prone position. Opacification of the pelvicalyceal system was performed. The puncture was done by a 22-guage puncture needle was advanced into the posterior lower calyx under fluoroscopic guidance. After successful access is established, a 0.035-inch curved guide wire was advanced through the puncture needle into the kidney. The central Alkane Rod was passed over the guide wire. Under fluoroscopic guidance serial Amplatz dilators up to 30 Fr were advanced over central Alkane rod and guide wire. Then 30 Fr long Amplatz sheath was advanced over the last dilator. 26 Fr rigid long nephroscope used for stone fragmentation and retrieval. Stone fragmentation was done by pneumatic Swiss Lithoclast. Fragments removal was done using toothed peanut stone retrieval forceps.
- PROCEDURE
-
retrograde intrarenal surgery
urethrocystoscopy was carried out then inserting of a 7F open ended ureteral catheter over the 0.035-inch straight floppy tip guide wire in the working channel of the 22Fr cystoscope under fluoroscopic guidance, access to the ureter was made. Teflon ureteric dilators are used to dilate the distal ureter till 14 FR. ureteral access sheath placement 12 or 14 Fr. OTU, a disposable digital flexible ureteroscope, is then used then the tip of a 272 m holmium laser fiber is placed on the surface of the stone for fragmentation. Intra renal lithotripsy was carried out using a 30 W Holmium: YAG laser (Sphinx Jr.) via a 272 m silica quartz laser fiber. 1.9 Fr tipless nitinol baskets were finally used to remove the large fragments. A Double-J (6 Fr) stent is generally applied at the end of the procedure, and a urethral catheter was applied.
Sponsors & Collaborators
-
Helwan University
collaborator OTHER -
bassem metwally
lead OTHER
Principal Investigators
-
bassem A metwally, master · Helwan University
Study Design
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Masking
- NONE
- Model
- PARALLEL
Eligibility
- Min Age
- 18 Years
- Sex
- ALL
- Healthy Volunteers
- No
Timeline & Regulatory
- Start
- 2020-12-02
- Primary Completion
- 2022-08-10
- Completion
- 2022-09-15
Countries
- Egypt
Study Locations
More Related Trials
-
Flexible Mini Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy Vs Retrograde Intra-renal Surgery
NCT06249100 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: PHASE2/PHASE3
-
Comparison of the Efficacy of Flexible Ureteroscope and Percutaneous Nephroscopic Surgery in the Treatment of 2-4cm Kidney Stones
NCT06507176 ·Status: TERMINATED ·Phase: NA
-
Ultra Mini Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy VS Stented Extracorporeal Shock Wave Lithotripsy for Stone Management
NCT05697341 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Modified Supine vs Prone Position Pnl
NCT05379894 ·Status: RECRUITING
-
Laparoscopic Pyelolithotomy Versus Percutaneous Nephrolothotomy for Management of >3cm Renal Pelvis Stone
NCT01637337 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: PHASE2/PHASE3
-
Comparing Efficacy and Complication Between Prone Versus Prone-Flexed Position for Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy (PCNL)
NCT06624306 ·Status: ACTIVE_NOT_RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Comparison of RIRS Versus PCNL Methods, According to Postoperative Pain and Analgesic Demand in 2 to 4 cm Renal Stones
NCT02430168 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: PHASE4
-
Endoscopic Guided PCNL Versus Standard PCNL
NCT04825353 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Determinants of Health-related Quality of Life for Patients After Renal Lithotripsy: PNL Versus RIRS
NCT05851339 ·Status: UNKNOWN
-
F-URS and Mini PCNL for Pediatric Urolithiasis
NCT06571617 ·Status: NOT_YET_RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Efficacy and Safety of Narrow Focus (F1) Versus Wide Focus (F3) of Shock Wave Lithotripsy (SWL) for Renal Calculi
NCT04759599 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Mini-PNL, RIRS, and ESWL for Treatment of Medium-Sized, High-Density, Non-Lower Pole, Renal Stones
NCT04856722 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Clinical Efficacy of Mini-PCNLversus RIRS for the Management of Upper Urinary Tract Calculus (1-2.5 cm)
NCT06031103 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Tubeless Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy Without Reverse Insertion of a Ureteral Catheter
NCT05574517 ·Status: RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Ultraslow SWL Versus Slow SWL for Renal Stones With High Attenuation Value
NCT03795532 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
The Influence of SMP on Renal Pelvic Pressure In Vivo
NCT02760134 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
to Study the Role of Retrograde Intrarenal Surgery in Management of Renal Stones
NCT05648877 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Effectiveness of Drainage by PCN vs. JJ in Patients With Symptoms of Obstructive Kidney Disease Caused by Urolithiasis
NCT04594161 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Laser Lithotripsy for Ureteral Stones
NCT06465784 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: PHASE4
-
Prospective Assessment of Procedure-Related and Patient-Reported Outcomes After Retrograde Intrarenal Surgery (RIRS) for Renal Calculi Less Than 20 mm
NCT03719456 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
A Prospective Comparison of Fluoroscopic, Sonographic or Combined Approach for Renal Access in Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy
NCT02266381 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
SMP vs RIRS for Symptomatic Lower Pole Renal Calculi of 10-20 mm Size: a Randomized Controlled Trial
NCT02519634 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Flexible Ureteroscopy Versus Extracorporeal Shock Wave Lithotripsy
NCT07193940 ·Status: NOT_YET_RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Quality of Life in Kidney Stone Patients Undergoing Surgery
NCT02625051 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Ultrasonic vs. Fluoroscopic Guided PNL in Pediatric Renal Stones
NCT03250559 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA